Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: What kind of future are our children actually growing into?

We allow children to be willful because that is part of what growing up means—moving from ignorance to understanding, from impulsiveness to maturity, from confusion to clarity. Willfulness is a natural part of learning to face reality, make sense of rules, and understand a complex world. A society that cannot make space for a child’s willfulness is one that risks suppressing vitality and creativity.

But there is a deeper problem. What happens when children are not just willful, but are influenced by ignorance, hatred, and pressure—when they begin to embrace cruelty, violence, or extremism, even becoming messengers for these forces? At that point, their willfulness is no longer a sign of youth—it becomes a warning sign for the future.

The tragedy of our time: when “justice” becomes a mask for hatred

June 9, 2025 — A chilling piece of international news: Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old Swedish climate activist, was intercepted by Israeli forces aboard the Madelene, a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza. Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, she became part of a political and violent confrontation.

On the surface, this story appears to be just another chapter in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, or a case of humanitarian intervention. But what has truly stirred debate is not the ship or the mission—it is Greta herself, and the influence she exerts.

Once celebrated as a global icon of climate action, peace, and youthful moral courage, Greta was the girl who stood at the UN, boldly calling out world leaders for their inaction on the climate crisis. She inspired millions of young people to speak up for the planet. But now, swept up in the waves of political radicalization, she seems to be drifting away from her original cause. No longer just a voice for the environment, she is increasingly being seen as a mouthpiece for extremist narratives—openly supporting violence, and lending legitimacy to hate in the name of justice.

This is one of the most striking examples of media manipulation in the 21st century: the anger and goodwill of youth are repackaged as “justice”; the harsh and complex realities of political conflict are reduced to simplistic black-and-white narratives; and what should be a call to conscience and social responsibility is replaced by group hysteria and ideological obsession.

The real concern of Greta Thunberg lies in what she has come to symbolize—a generation of young people who, under the influence of social media, online discourse, and political polarization, are rapidly losing their sense of judgment, their ability to reason, and their grasp of the world’s complexity. Instead, they are becoming carriers of hatred, generators of outrage, and tools for the normalization of violence.

We must not let our children grow up in hatred

We can forgive young people for their defiance of authority, their anger at the world, their questioning of injustice—these are natural parts of growing up.

We can understand their impulsiveness, their emotional outbursts, even their moments of extremism, as expressions of youthful ignorance.

But what we must not tolerate—what we absolutely cannot enable—is their voluntary embrace of hatred, their fascination with violence, their worship of extremism. We cannot let them mistake obsession for conviction, or destruction for justice.

Behind every disaster, every collapse of society, every eruption of violence, there is always a group of young people who have been seduced by extremist ideas, inflamed by dogma, and taken hostage by hatred.

These were young people who could have been builders, but were turned into destroyers. They could have been hope, but became a living nightmare.

The Greta incident is not just a headline—it is a reflection of something far deeper: a society losing its values, an education system failing its youth, media shaping public opinion with bias, and social networks driving people into emotional extremes.

How does a young person, once full of idealism and compassion, lose her independent judgment and slide into the arms of extremism, giving legitimacy to political violence? The answer is not just her personal tragedy—it is a symptom of a sick era.

Who will protect the children—who will protect the future?

Yes, children are our future.

But the future is not automatically beautiful. It must be shaped, protected, and guided by reason and kindness.

And that responsibility falls on us—all of us.

Society needs to teach the kids:

  • Kindness is not blind allegiance, but the ability to judge right from wrong independently.
  • Justice is not a mask for violence, but a commitment to fairness and the refusal to harm the innocent.
  • Anger is human—but obsession is dangerous. Questioning authority is healthy, but blindly following extremism is not.
  • True courage means holding on to reason in a world full of complexity—not getting swept away by waves of emotional frenzy.

Parents, educators, the media, institutions, and every single adult must take up this responsibility.

In an age of noise and chaos, reason and conscience are the most precious—and the most scarce—resources.

If we allow our youth to grow up immersed in hatred, obsession, violence, and political fanaticism, the future will not belong to the builders and protectors. It will belong to the agitators and destroyers.

And that is a future no civilization can afford.

A final word

Today, we see Greta. But in every country, there are countless young people who have been influenced by extremist ideologies, manipulated by online narratives, and seduced by the illusion of false justice.

If we continue to sleepwalk through this crisis—if we do not wake up to educate, protect, and guide them—if we do not reflect on the collapse of our values, the polarization of public discourse, and the imbalance in our education systems, then twenty years from now, we may find ourselves in a world consumed by hatred, where violence is justified, extremism is normalized, and no safe ground remains.

Yes, children are our future.

But whether that future is filled with light or swallowed by darkness depends entirely on what we choose to plant in their hearts today.

Kindness may be naïve—but justice must never be twisted into a weapon of hate.

Confusion is part of growing up—but society must never stop offering wisdom and direction.

We cannot afford to lose our way any longer.

The future belongs to them. But protecting that future—that is our responsibility.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

靈魂覺醒的三個階段

Daohe · Jan 19, 2025

靈魂的覺醒是每個人內心深處最深切的探索之旅,是從迷茫到清明,從束縛到自由的過程。這個過程並非一蹴而就,而是一個逐步深入、層層展開的自我覺察與超越的過程。本文將靈魂的覺醒劃分為三個階段,每個階段都是一個深刻的認知轉變,讓我們走向更加自由的旅程,深入洞察自我與世界。 第一次覺醒:超越自我,洞察本我 靈魂的第一次覺醒是一種全新的體驗。如同嬰兒初次睜開眼睛,人開始真正意義上地看清楚這個世界,也隨之看清楚自己。這種覺醒的前兆是一些特殊的經歷,啟發人去思考自己存在的意義。但認知上的突破往往不是漸進的,而是突然發生的,像一束閃耀的光芒,瞬間引發了思想的劇變。 此時,人開始意識到,自己的自我認知是如何被外部因素所塑造的——比如社會的期待、家庭的傳統和文化的規範。這些曾經看似理所當然的外部構建,開始呈現其真正的本質——暫時、隨意、甚至是無厘頭的。由此覺悟,人們才能擺脫對這些外在因素的依賴,意識到真正的自我遠遠超越了一切表象。 這一覺醒讓人意識到生而為人這件事的本質,擁抱自己最真實的人性,了解自己的靈魂真面目。同時,個體幾乎不可避免地會經歷掙扎與失落,因為自己賴以為生的身份基礎被動搖了。曾經帶來安慰的熟悉角色、關係和信仰,也開始變得不再牢固,取而代之的是一種暴露於天地之間的脆弱感。 然而,正是透過這樣重量級的覺悟,一個人才可能脫離對外在因素的依賴,意識到真正的自我是超越一切表象的存在,看清楚自己和世界的真相,釋放出內在的潛力,體驗什麼是清明地真正地活著。 第二次覺醒:洞察世界,探索使命 在第一次覺醒的基礎上,站在更廣闊的視野上審視自我後,靈魂將進入了第二次覺醒的階段。在這一階段,覺醒不再侷限於個人的內心世界,而是擴展到對整個世界的重新認知。我們不僅僅是在個人精神與靈魂的層面上探索意義,更在更宏觀的層面上思考世界的構成:社會的結構、文化的意義,以及個人與這些外部因素之間錯綜複雜的關係。 此時,人看待世界的眼光變得純粹而清新。他開始思考:我是誰?我為何而存在?我們的生命對這個浩瀚宇宙、對社會、對人類文明究竟意味著什麼?這些問題不再是空泛的哲學探討,而是滲透進日常生活的深刻思考。人會開始明白,自己的生命不僅僅是短暫的個體存在,它更是歷史洪流中的一部分,是文化傳承的重要載體。 第二次覺醒不再是單純的自我解放,它是對整個世界的深刻洞察,是對自己與世界關係的更全面理解。這種覺醒讓我們看清楚自己在龐大的社會系統和文化體系中的角色。這種覺醒標誌著個體超越了社會文化對「人」的調剂與塑造,成為了一個真正的人。人開始探索自己的使命,並意識到,這個使命並非外界強加的,而是從內心深處自然流露的。由此,人會真正愛上生活本身,愛上賴以生存的家園。 第三次覺醒:重新定位,改造世界 第三次覺醒,是靈魂覺醒的最深層次,也是最具創造性的階段。這一階段標誌著個體在徹底認清自己與世界關係之後,主動地重新定義自己的身份、關係,甚至整個生活環境。這是一種來自內心深處的召喚,驅使人依據靈魂的真正目標,去創造、去改變,去以全新的方式重新塑造自我和周圍的世界。 第三次覺醒帶來的是深刻的責任感與使命感。這一階段的覺醒,超越了個人層面的自我實現,人開始考慮如何為社會、為人類共同體貢獻力量。通過重新審視和定位自己的身份與社會關係,個體不再是單純的社會參與者,而是成為了世界的創造者與改造者。靈魂的覺醒因此進入了一個全新的維度,個體不僅僅是生活的體驗者,還是生活的創造者。 這一覺醒意味著個體開始主動承擔起推動世界變化的責任。他們不再侷限於自我滿足,而是力求以行動去塑造自己理想中的世界,無論是通過職業、藝術創作、社會服務,還是通過日常生活中的選擇與決策。個體開始意識到,自己的每一份努力都可能成為推動社會進步的力量,自己的每一個改變都可能引領他人走向更高的覺悟。 這一過程並非一蹴而就,而是一個持續不斷的創造與重塑過程。它要求個體具備更高的覺知、深刻的內省,以及堅韌的行動力。在這一過程中,個體不僅僅是在改變世界,更是在經歷一種靈魂的昇華,邁向一種更為宏大和廣闊的存在方式。這是靈魂最具創造力的覺醒,它不僅為個體帶來了深遠的轉變,也為社會和整個世界注入了新的活力與希望。 總結 靈魂的覺醒是一個從自我認知到社會參與,再到世界創造的漸進過程。每一個階段的覺醒都是深刻的轉變,帶領個體從局限走向自由,從困惑走向清晰,從束縛走向力量。最終,靈魂的覺醒不僅讓個體看清自己的內心深處,也讓他們意識到自己的使命,進而在世界中找到自己的位置,推動社會與文化的進步。

The three stages of spiritual awakening

Daohe · Jan 19, 2025

The awakening of the soul is the deepest journey of exploration within each individual, a path from confusion to clarity, from constraint to freedom. It is not a sudden leap but a gradual, layered unfolding of self-awareness and transcendence. This process can be divided into three stages, each representing a profound shift in perception, guiding […]

read more

Related Content

Benevolent Dreams and Leadership
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 22, 2024
In any society, the mission of a leader is deeply tied to the direction and hope of its people. The defining trait of a leader is not the resources they command or the extent of their personal abilities but whether they can inspire the collective and the era with a clear and ambitious vision. Dreams […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Building a Sustainable Civilized Society: Understanding Dictatorship
Building a Sustainable Civilized Society: Understanding Dictatorship
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 28, 2024
To create a more advanced civilization, we must first understand both the foundations of a civilized society and the forces that drive progress. Meanwhile, it is also necessary to recognize the factors that are hindering the advancement of civilization. Only with this understanding can people work together to build a society that cultivates virtue and […]
Poverty stems from a disrespect for civilization and discrimination
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
Poverty isn’t merely the evidence of economic deprivation. It is the manifestation of deeper structural issues within society. Around the world, the cause of poverty can mostly be traced back to the violation of civilization, discrimination, and a lack of respect. Civilization is the spiritual and material foundation of humanity. Only when civilization is respected […]
View All Content