Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: What kind of future are our children actually growing into?

We allow children to be willful because that is part of what growing up means—moving from ignorance to understanding, from impulsiveness to maturity, from confusion to clarity. Willfulness is a natural part of learning to face reality, make sense of rules, and understand a complex world. A society that cannot make space for a child’s willfulness is one that risks suppressing vitality and creativity.

But there is a deeper problem. What happens when children are not just willful, but are influenced by ignorance, hatred, and pressure—when they begin to embrace cruelty, violence, or extremism, even becoming messengers for these forces? At that point, their willfulness is no longer a sign of youth—it becomes a warning sign for the future.

The tragedy of our time: when “justice” becomes a mask for hatred

June 9, 2025 — A chilling piece of international news: Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old Swedish climate activist, was intercepted by Israeli forces aboard the Madelene, a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza. Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, she became part of a political and violent confrontation.

On the surface, this story appears to be just another chapter in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, or a case of humanitarian intervention. But what has truly stirred debate is not the ship or the mission—it is Greta herself, and the influence she exerts.

Once celebrated as a global icon of climate action, peace, and youthful moral courage, Greta was the girl who stood at the UN, boldly calling out world leaders for their inaction on the climate crisis. She inspired millions of young people to speak up for the planet. But now, swept up in the waves of political radicalization, she seems to be drifting away from her original cause. No longer just a voice for the environment, she is increasingly being seen as a mouthpiece for extremist narratives—openly supporting violence, and lending legitimacy to hate in the name of justice.

This is one of the most striking examples of media manipulation in the 21st century: the anger and goodwill of youth are repackaged as “justice”; the harsh and complex realities of political conflict are reduced to simplistic black-and-white narratives; and what should be a call to conscience and social responsibility is replaced by group hysteria and ideological obsession.

The real concern of Greta Thunberg lies in what she has come to symbolize—a generation of young people who, under the influence of social media, online discourse, and political polarization, are rapidly losing their sense of judgment, their ability to reason, and their grasp of the world’s complexity. Instead, they are becoming carriers of hatred, generators of outrage, and tools for the normalization of violence.

We must not let our children grow up in hatred

We can forgive young people for their defiance of authority, their anger at the world, their questioning of injustice—these are natural parts of growing up.

We can understand their impulsiveness, their emotional outbursts, even their moments of extremism, as expressions of youthful ignorance.

But what we must not tolerate—what we absolutely cannot enable—is their voluntary embrace of hatred, their fascination with violence, their worship of extremism. We cannot let them mistake obsession for conviction, or destruction for justice.

Behind every disaster, every collapse of society, every eruption of violence, there is always a group of young people who have been seduced by extremist ideas, inflamed by dogma, and taken hostage by hatred.

These were young people who could have been builders, but were turned into destroyers. They could have been hope, but became a living nightmare.

The Greta incident is not just a headline—it is a reflection of something far deeper: a society losing its values, an education system failing its youth, media shaping public opinion with bias, and social networks driving people into emotional extremes.

How does a young person, once full of idealism and compassion, lose her independent judgment and slide into the arms of extremism, giving legitimacy to political violence? The answer is not just her personal tragedy—it is a symptom of a sick era.

Who will protect the children—who will protect the future?

Yes, children are our future.

But the future is not automatically beautiful. It must be shaped, protected, and guided by reason and kindness.

And that responsibility falls on us—all of us.

Society needs to teach the kids:

  • Kindness is not blind allegiance, but the ability to judge right from wrong independently.
  • Justice is not a mask for violence, but a commitment to fairness and the refusal to harm the innocent.
  • Anger is human—but obsession is dangerous. Questioning authority is healthy, but blindly following extremism is not.
  • True courage means holding on to reason in a world full of complexity—not getting swept away by waves of emotional frenzy.

Parents, educators, the media, institutions, and every single adult must take up this responsibility.

In an age of noise and chaos, reason and conscience are the most precious—and the most scarce—resources.

If we allow our youth to grow up immersed in hatred, obsession, violence, and political fanaticism, the future will not belong to the builders and protectors. It will belong to the agitators and destroyers.

And that is a future no civilization can afford.

A final word

Today, we see Greta. But in every country, there are countless young people who have been influenced by extremist ideologies, manipulated by online narratives, and seduced by the illusion of false justice.

If we continue to sleepwalk through this crisis—if we do not wake up to educate, protect, and guide them—if we do not reflect on the collapse of our values, the polarization of public discourse, and the imbalance in our education systems, then twenty years from now, we may find ourselves in a world consumed by hatred, where violence is justified, extremism is normalized, and no safe ground remains.

Yes, children are our future.

But whether that future is filled with light or swallowed by darkness depends entirely on what we choose to plant in their hearts today.

Kindness may be naïve—but justice must never be twisted into a weapon of hate.

Confusion is part of growing up—but society must never stop offering wisdom and direction.

We cannot afford to lose our way any longer.

The future belongs to them. But protecting that future—that is our responsibility.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 一、国家とは何か?社会公民とは何か? 国家とは、抽象的な疆域、制度、政体、あるいは政権の集合体ではありません。近代国家の本質とは、公民が、自らの利益、共同の安全、そして未来へのビジョンを基に、自発的に締結した政治共同体です。公民は、国家が存在するための主体であり、根幹なのです。もし国家に、真の意味での「公民」が存在しなければ、その国は政治共同体としての正当性を失い、単なる統治機関や暴力装置へと成り下がってしまいます。 公民であるということの真の意味は、単に特定の国境内に居住していることでも、その国の身分証明書を所持していることでもありません。それは、政治的主権を享受しているかどうかにかかっています。 政治的主権を持って初めて、個人は真に「国家共同体」における権力の主体となることができます。そうして初めて、国家権力の運営を決定し、監督し、それに関与し、抑制と均衡を図ることができるのです。そして、国家を、一部の少数者の専有物ではなく、「私たちの国家」とすることができるのです。 二、歴史の深層:国家と主権の進化 人類の政治史を概観すると、国家の出現は当初、部族の連合、軍事的な拡大、そして領土の支配に源を発していました。初期の「国家」は、武力と血縁によって維持され、個人に権利はなく、臣民に主権はありませんでした。中世の封建帝国や神権政治も、例外なく政治的主権を国王、教皇、貴族、聖職者といった階層の手に固く握りしめ、人民は家畜のように、その運命は草のように扱われました。 近代的な国民国家が興隆し、啓蒙主義運動、ブルジョア革命、そして近代的な立憲制度が確立されて初めて、「国民主権」や「公民の政治参加」が、国家の政治構造の中に徐々に組み込まれていったのです。フランス革命は「主権は人民に属する」と宣言し、アメリカ合衆国憲法は「人民政府、民選議会」を確立しました。こうして、近代国家の政治的正当性は、初めて「公民の主権」の上に築かれ始めたのです。 しかしながら、今日の世界を見渡しても、真に「公民の政治的主権」を実現している国家は、ごく少数です。大多数の国家は、依然として「見せかけの公民国家」の状態に留まっています。すなわち、名目上は「人民が国家の主である」としながら、実質的には権力は少数の集団に集中し、公民は受動的な服従者や道具に過ぎないのです。 公民が不在であれば、主権もまた不在となり、国家は退化し、文明は停滞します。 三、政治的主権の真の意味 政治的主権とは、形式的に設けられた法律の条文でも、時折行われる選挙投票でもありません。それは、公民が、国家権力の運営、公共の事柄に関する意思決定、公的資源の分配、そして国家の統治構造の設計に、実質的に関与できる権利のことです。 具体的には、以下の権利が含まれます。 もし国家が、形式的な「投票」だけを許し、公民に実質的な政治的主権を与えないのであれば、公民は単なる数字へと成り下がり、国家は寡頭制へと堕落するでしょう。 四、主権なくして、公民という存在は偽りとなる 現実の世界では、多くの国家が自らを「公民国家」と称しながらも、形式的に公民としての身分を与えているに過ぎません。その実質において、公民は主権を持たず、国家の統治に実質的に参加する権利もありません。 彼らは義務を負い、代償を払いながらも、権力構造の外側に置かれ、国家という機械の付属物となっているのです。 それは、以下のことを意味します。 この現象は、深く考察するに値する社会構造を浮かび上がらせます。すなわち、国家は制度設計上、「公民を基本とする」と約束しながら、実践においては、公民が公共の事柄における共同の参加者であるという地位を、真に実現できていないのです。 主権が人々の手から失われる時、国家はもはや民心を引きつける力を持ちません。社会の信頼はそこから瓦解し、文明発展の礎は揺らぎ始めます。最終的に、そのような国家は、全国民のものではなくなり、特権階級の私有財産と化し、その衰退もまた、覆い難いものとなるでしょう。 五、主権の欠如が、国家の運命に与える影響 歴史と現実は、社会公民から主権を奪ったいかなる国家も、最終的には以下の四つの苦境に陥ることを、繰り返し証明しています。 六、文明の未来における、唯一の道 人類文明が持続的に進歩しようとするならば、唯一実行可能な道は、「公民の政治的主権」を全面的に確立した、近代的な国家制度を築くことです。すなわち、 ただ、そうして初めて、国家は真に「公民国家」となり、社会は安定的で、公正で、繁栄し、文明は持続的に進化していくことができるのです。 結語 公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 国家が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それは権力者の支配と暴力装置が残るだけです。 社会が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、そこには抑圧、収奪、そして偽善的なパフォーマンスが残るだけです。 文明が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それはやて暗黒、腐敗、そして崩壊へと陥るでしょう。 国家の真の主人たりうるのは、政治的主権をその手に握る、社会公民だけです。未来が真に属するのは自ら目覚め、参加し、権利を求め、そして自らの主権を守り抜く勇気を持つ社会公民なのです。 これこそが、国家が存在するための最低ラインであり、一つの文明が前進し続けられるかどうかを左右する、最後の保証なのです。  

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

read more

Related Content

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
The burden of livelihood in childhood: the hidden crisis of Confucian education in modern East Asia
The burden of livelihood in childhood: the hidden crisis of Confucian education in modern East Asia
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jul 2, 2025
Introduction: A hidden disease at the heart of civilization On the surface, Confucian-influenced societies such as Japan, South Korea, and Singapore appear to embody a successful Eastern model of modern civilization—orderly, safe, and built upon a tightly run education system. But beneath this polished exterior lies a deep, systemic fracture in their civilizational foundation: an […]
Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
In today’s world, where information is overwhelming, it’s easy to feel lost and confused. We’re all trying to find our way, looking to understand ourselves, others, and the world around us. But this process isn’t something that happens overnight. Instead, it takes a lot of time and reflection. In this column, we will share conversations […]
Why systems matter more than tech
Why systems matter more than tech
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 13, 2025
This passage emphasizes that the key to civilizational progress lies in systems, not technology. A system defines how social resources are organized and how power is structured. Its flexibility determines whether institutions can improve and whether technology can be used effectively—ultimately shaping the direction of civilization. A healthy system drives prosperity; a rigid one leads to collapse. Technology only serves the system.
View All Content