Illiterate education is dragging our future onto the wrong path and pushing civilization backward

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge Introduction Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such […]

Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge

Introduction

Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such education risks producing conformity, rigidity, and a kind of “educated illiteracy”—people who may look well-schooled yet lack critical thinking and independence. And when education is twisted and stripped of its moral foundation, it can even drive people toward destructive paths, normalizing violence, exploitation, and other harmful attitudes. This article asks: when education loses its progressive vision, does it not become not only illiterate education, but even toxic education?

I. What is “progressive thinking”: the soul of education

Progressive thinking means that education should guide students to go beyond existing knowledge frameworks, fostering critical thinking, creativity, and a sense of social responsibility. It not only helps students understand knowledge but also equips them with the ability to think independently, question the status quo, and develop a civil perspective, giving them insight and a sense of social responsibilty. Education without progressive thinking merely accumulates facts, teaching students to absorb information mechanically and turning them into “knowledge slaves” without intellectual freedom. Progressive thinking is the very soul of education; without it, education loses both its dignity and its moral foundation.

II. Why education without progressive thinking is “illiteracy education”

1. The “rote learning” model fosters intellectual conformity

Education that lacks progressive thinking often relies on a rote, “spoon-fed” approach, turning knowledge into mechanical memorization and suppressing students’ curiosity and desire to explore. In such a system, students become accustomed to accepting “standard answers” rather than questioning, understanding, or applying knowledge. This approach stifles critical thinking, leaving students unable to make independent judgments in real life, and ultimately produces individuals who are rich in information but poor in true understanding—intellectual “illiterates.”

2. The suppression of individuality and creativity

Education without progressive thinking often emphasizes uniform standards and rules, ignoring individual differences and uniqueness. In such an environment, students are forced to conform, leaving little room for personal development. Their creativity and individuality are stifled, leading to dependence on rules and fear of innovation. Graduates of this system struggle to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing society; their thinking stagnates, turning them into “domesticated illiterates.”

2. The lack of social responsibility

True education should help students understand their place in society and the impact of social progress on individuals, fostering a sense of responsibility toward others and the community.However, education without progressive thinking often focuses on personal achievement or self-interest, neglecting collective and societal responsibility.Students shaped by such an education may become indifferent to society and others, forming “spiritual illiterates” — individuals who lack understanding and recognition of social justice and moral values.

III. Why education without progressive thinking becomes “toxic education”

1. Blind obedience and suppressed individuality

Education without progressive thinking often produces blind followers. Students are trained not to question or reflect, becoming “obedient conformists” who habitually defer to authority, even obeying unreasonable rules and orders without judgment. When such students enter society, they tend to ignore social issues and may even carry out harmful orders. In essence, this type of education encourages the abuse of power and fosters unethical behavior in society.

2. The rise of a violent culture

Education without progressive thinking tends to foster extremism and violent tendencies, as it lacks tolerance for diversity and difference.Such education fails to teach students to understand and respect differing opinions, favoring instead a rigid “black-or-white” mindset.Individuals shaped by this environment are prone to extreme reactions when confronted with opposing views, often resorting to aggressive or harmful actions. This, in turn, contributes to the spread of rogue or antisocial behavior.

3. Utilitarianism and exploitative mindset

In an education system lacking progressive thought, the focus of learning becomes narrow, often overemphasizing personal gain and material achievement. This environment fosters a utilitarian and exploitative mindset—students pursue their own success without regard for social justice or the welfare of others. To them, sacrificing others’ interests or using improper means to achieve personal goals seems justified. This mentality closely mirrors the essence of antisocial behavior.

IV. Typical manifestations of toxic education

1. Exam-oriented education

Exam-oriented education is a prime example of toxic education. It focuses solely on grades while neglecting students’ interests, personalities, and sense of social responsibility. Students are trained to become exam machines, willing to do whatever it takes for high scores, even cheating or engaging in unfair competition. This approach not only stifles creativity but also fosters a utilitarian mindset, reducing education to a tool for personal gain.

2. Indoctrination of power and hierarchy

Some educational systems uphold rigid hierarchies, instilling obedience and subservience from a young age. Students learn to defer to authority and follow unreasonable rules, cultivating a submissive mindset. When such students step into society, they often lack awareness of equality, tend to suppress others, and may treat vulnerable people unjustly. This phenomenon essentially reflects antisocial behavior, highlighting the moral failure of the education system.”

3. Vocational education lacking humanistic care

Vocational education should cultivate skills and expertise, but if it ignores humanistic values and ethical guidance, students may treat skills purely as tools for profit, without regard for legality or morality. This lack of humanistic care produces individuals in society who lack responsibility and ethical awareness, and may misuse their professional skills, harming social interests.

V. Revitalizing progressive thought in education: preventing “illiteracy” and “toxic” behavior

1. Cultivating Critical and Innovative Thinking

To mitigate the negative effects of “illiteracy” and “antisocial” tendencies in education, it is essential to cultivate students’ critical and creative thinking. Teachers should encourage students to question and explore different perspectives, helping them learn to think independently rather than rely solely on authority. This way, students are better prepared to face complex social challenges and avoid blind obedience or extreme behaviors.

2. Strengthening Moral and Humanistic Education

Education lacking progressive thinking often falls short in moral guidance. Therefore, integrating humanistic and moral education is important to help students understand fairness, respect, and social responsibility. Moral education encourages students to consider the well-being of others and society while pursuing personal goals, reducing tendencies toward exploitation or violence.

3. Creating Diverse and Inclusive Learning Environments

A diverse and inclusive educational environment fosters openness and tolerance, reducing the likelihood of extreme or confrontational behavior. Students who grow up in such environments are more capable of respecting different cultures and viewpoints, helping to prevent the negative consequences of antisocial education.

Conclusion

Education without progressive thinking is a failed form of education. It not only fails to inspire students’ wisdom but can also turn them into “illiterates” who lack independent judgment. Even more concerning, its moral shortcomings and emphasis on authority and hierarchy can produce individuals whose behavior is harmful to society. True education emphasizes the development of progressive thought and moral growth, nurturing citizens with social responsibility, creativity, and independent thinking—ultimately driving the continuous advancement of human civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「利民」と「利国」の違い──現代国家統治の正道と秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家の存在理由は、スローガンでも領土でも GDP でもない。 国民の基本的権利を保障し、生活の尊厳を守り、幸福度を高めること――これだけが国家の存在意義である。 もし国家が強大でも国民が困窮し、国の栄光が語られても国民が不安に苛まれているのなら、その国家はうわべだけの空洞だ。見た目は繁栄していても、内部には問題が山積している。 したがって、「利国」と「利民」の本質的な違いを明確にし、「利民」を国家統治の唯一の正当性の根拠として確立することこそが、現代国家の安定・公正・持続的繁栄の前提となる。 Ⅰ. 「利国」と「利民」の矛盾とは何か 利国:国家規模の戦略、安全保障、経済成長、軍事的地位、国際的影響力など、システム全体の目標 利民:国民一人ひとりの収入、雇用保障、住宅・医療、言論の自由、司法の公正、公共福祉、人格の尊厳、政治参加の権利 本来であれば両者は一致すべきだが、権力運用と国家意思の実行過程で次のような構造的矛盾が生じやすい: これら構造的矛盾こそが「利国」優先政策の最大の弊害であり、国民にとっての真の敵である。 Ⅱ. 「利国」中心政策が孕む七つのリスク 表面的な国威や外交上の強硬姿勢を保つために、国民の権利を犠牲にする国家も存在する。こうした選択は、やがて七つの重大なリスクの種を撒くことになる: 1.社会的信頼の崩壊 国民が政府・制度・司法を信頼できず、行政命令が形骸化する。 2.貧富の極端な格差 国家戦略を名目に資源を独占した資本集団に富が集中し、貧困層はさらに貧しくなる。 3. 政治的正当性の危機 国家の公信力が失われ、制度への帰属意識が崩壊し、正当性の源泉が枯渇する。 4.社会不安の蔓延 住宅・雇用・教育・老後・医療のコストが高騰し、国民の心理的バランスが崩れる。 5.公共政策の硬直化 少数の特権層が政策を握り、修正メカニズムが働かず、矛盾が雪だるま式に増大する。 6.言論統制の逆効果 メディア抑制が国民の鬱憤を蓄積させ、「表面は静穏、地下では激流」という状況を生む。 7.長期的競争力の損失 イノベーションや文化創造力が枯渇し、国家は徐々に国際競争力を失う。 Ⅲ. 利民型国家の統治中核原則 真に現代的な国家統治には、国民本位の四大原則を確立しなければならない: 1. 民生優先の原則 財政はまず医療・教育・住宅・雇用・年金など、国民の基本的生活水準を保障することを最優先とする。 2. 権利保障の原則 憲法により、知る権利・表現の自由・政治参加権・監視権を明確に保障する。 3. 公共財政の透明原則 予算編成から執行、行政情報まで全面公開し、納税者が全過程を監督できる仕組みを整える。 4. 権力限定の原則 国家権力は法律によって厳格に拘束され、公権力は公共利益のためだけに行使される。私物化・道具化・世襲化を許さない。 Ⅳ. 合理的国家統治構造の全体図 「三元共治・双方制衡」の構造を確立する: 権力主体 機能定位 監督関係 国家政府 国家安全、財政調整、立法、外交 国民・メディア・議会による監督 市民社会 […]

read more

Related Content

Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]
4 Reasons For Children To Deserve a Better Future In Society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 1, 2025
A child’s success depends not just on their innate talents or personal effort. In reality, how far they can go is mostly decided by the opportunities and environment that society creates for them. When society provides the right support and room for growth, children’s potential can be fully unlocked for a better future. In essence, […]
In Quality Education, Every child is an A
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 27, 2024
The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]
The Gap in Education is the Gap in Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
Thinking on Education Gap Introduction Throughout different historical periods, disparities in education have consistently reflected gaps in civilization. Education is the cornerstone for shaping the qualities of individuals, building social culture and values, and driving technological innovation. Differences in educational levels directly affect the degree of civilization within a society. A review of human history […]
View All Content