Illiterate education is dragging our future onto the wrong path and pushing civilization backward

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge Introduction Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such […]

Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge

Introduction

Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such education risks producing conformity, rigidity, and a kind of “educated illiteracy”—people who may look well-schooled yet lack critical thinking and independence. And when education is twisted and stripped of its moral foundation, it can even drive people toward destructive paths, normalizing violence, exploitation, and other harmful attitudes. This article asks: when education loses its progressive vision, does it not become not only illiterate education, but even toxic education?

I. What is “progressive thinking”: the soul of education

Progressive thinking means that education should guide students to go beyond existing knowledge frameworks, fostering critical thinking, creativity, and a sense of social responsibility. It not only helps students understand knowledge but also equips them with the ability to think independently, question the status quo, and develop a civil perspective, giving them insight and a sense of social responsibilty. Education without progressive thinking merely accumulates facts, teaching students to absorb information mechanically and turning them into “knowledge slaves” without intellectual freedom. Progressive thinking is the very soul of education; without it, education loses both its dignity and its moral foundation.

II. Why education without progressive thinking is “illiteracy education”

1. The “rote learning” model fosters intellectual conformity

Education that lacks progressive thinking often relies on a rote, “spoon-fed” approach, turning knowledge into mechanical memorization and suppressing students’ curiosity and desire to explore. In such a system, students become accustomed to accepting “standard answers” rather than questioning, understanding, or applying knowledge. This approach stifles critical thinking, leaving students unable to make independent judgments in real life, and ultimately produces individuals who are rich in information but poor in true understanding—intellectual “illiterates.”

2. The suppression of individuality and creativity

Education without progressive thinking often emphasizes uniform standards and rules, ignoring individual differences and uniqueness. In such an environment, students are forced to conform, leaving little room for personal development. Their creativity and individuality are stifled, leading to dependence on rules and fear of innovation. Graduates of this system struggle to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing society; their thinking stagnates, turning them into “domesticated illiterates.”

2. The lack of social responsibility

True education should help students understand their place in society and the impact of social progress on individuals, fostering a sense of responsibility toward others and the community.However, education without progressive thinking often focuses on personal achievement or self-interest, neglecting collective and societal responsibility.Students shaped by such an education may become indifferent to society and others, forming “spiritual illiterates” — individuals who lack understanding and recognition of social justice and moral values.

III. Why education without progressive thinking becomes “toxic education”

1. Blind obedience and suppressed individuality

Education without progressive thinking often produces blind followers. Students are trained not to question or reflect, becoming “obedient conformists” who habitually defer to authority, even obeying unreasonable rules and orders without judgment. When such students enter society, they tend to ignore social issues and may even carry out harmful orders. In essence, this type of education encourages the abuse of power and fosters unethical behavior in society.

2. The rise of a violent culture

Education without progressive thinking tends to foster extremism and violent tendencies, as it lacks tolerance for diversity and difference.Such education fails to teach students to understand and respect differing opinions, favoring instead a rigid “black-or-white” mindset.Individuals shaped by this environment are prone to extreme reactions when confronted with opposing views, often resorting to aggressive or harmful actions. This, in turn, contributes to the spread of rogue or antisocial behavior.

3. Utilitarianism and exploitative mindset

In an education system lacking progressive thought, the focus of learning becomes narrow, often overemphasizing personal gain and material achievement. This environment fosters a utilitarian and exploitative mindset—students pursue their own success without regard for social justice or the welfare of others. To them, sacrificing others’ interests or using improper means to achieve personal goals seems justified. This mentality closely mirrors the essence of antisocial behavior.

IV. Typical manifestations of toxic education

1. Exam-oriented education

Exam-oriented education is a prime example of toxic education. It focuses solely on grades while neglecting students’ interests, personalities, and sense of social responsibility. Students are trained to become exam machines, willing to do whatever it takes for high scores, even cheating or engaging in unfair competition. This approach not only stifles creativity but also fosters a utilitarian mindset, reducing education to a tool for personal gain.

2. Indoctrination of power and hierarchy

Some educational systems uphold rigid hierarchies, instilling obedience and subservience from a young age. Students learn to defer to authority and follow unreasonable rules, cultivating a submissive mindset. When such students step into society, they often lack awareness of equality, tend to suppress others, and may treat vulnerable people unjustly. This phenomenon essentially reflects antisocial behavior, highlighting the moral failure of the education system.”

3. Vocational education lacking humanistic care

Vocational education should cultivate skills and expertise, but if it ignores humanistic values and ethical guidance, students may treat skills purely as tools for profit, without regard for legality or morality. This lack of humanistic care produces individuals in society who lack responsibility and ethical awareness, and may misuse their professional skills, harming social interests.

V. Revitalizing progressive thought in education: preventing “illiteracy” and “toxic” behavior

1. Cultivating Critical and Innovative Thinking

To mitigate the negative effects of “illiteracy” and “antisocial” tendencies in education, it is essential to cultivate students’ critical and creative thinking. Teachers should encourage students to question and explore different perspectives, helping them learn to think independently rather than rely solely on authority. This way, students are better prepared to face complex social challenges and avoid blind obedience or extreme behaviors.

2. Strengthening Moral and Humanistic Education

Education lacking progressive thinking often falls short in moral guidance. Therefore, integrating humanistic and moral education is important to help students understand fairness, respect, and social responsibility. Moral education encourages students to consider the well-being of others and society while pursuing personal goals, reducing tendencies toward exploitation or violence.

3. Creating Diverse and Inclusive Learning Environments

A diverse and inclusive educational environment fosters openness and tolerance, reducing the likelihood of extreme or confrontational behavior. Students who grow up in such environments are more capable of respecting different cultures and viewpoints, helping to prevent the negative consequences of antisocial education.

Conclusion

Education without progressive thinking is a failed form of education. It not only fails to inspire students’ wisdom but can also turn them into “illiterates” who lack independent judgment. Even more concerning, its moral shortcomings and emphasis on authority and hierarchy can produce individuals whose behavior is harmful to society. True education emphasizes the development of progressive thought and moral growth, nurturing citizens with social responsibility, creativity, and independent thinking—ultimately driving the continuous advancement of human civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

利民与利国之别:现代国家治理正道与秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家为何存在?不是为了口号、不是为了疆域、也不是为了GDP。 国家的存在意义,只在于保障公民基本权利、维护公民生活尊严、提升公民幸福指数。 若国家强大却百姓困苦,国家荣耀却公民焦虑,则这个国家必是空壳政体,强表弱里,表面繁荣,实则积弊丛生。 所以,厘清“利国”与“利民”的本质区别,并将“利民”确立为国家治理的唯一正当性,是现代国家稳定、公正、持久繁荣的前提。 一、利国与利民之间的矛盾是什么? 利国是指国家宏观战略、国家安全、经济增长、军事地位、国际影响力等系统性目标。 利民是指个体公民的收入水平、就业保障、住房医疗、言论自由、司法公正、公共福利、人格尊严、参与政治的权利。 二者本应统一,但在权力运作与国家意志实践过程中,常常出现以下结构性矛盾: 这些结构性矛盾是利国性政策最大的弊端,也是公民真正的敌人。 二、利国政策的风险有哪些? 有一些国家为保表面上的国家面子、外交强势,而选择去牺牲公民权利,久而久之,必然埋下七重风险,结果也一目了然: 1.社会信任体系崩塌 公民对政府、制度、执法、司法缺乏信任,政令失效。 2.贫富极化 资本集团借国家战略之名操控资源,财富向少数人聚集,贫者愈贫。 3. 政治合法性危机 国家公信力丧失,制度认同感坍塌,合法性来源逐渐流失。 4.社会焦虑蔓延 住房、就业、教育、养老、医疗成本高企,民众心理失衡。 5.公共政策僵化 少数权贵把持决策,政策缺乏修正机制,社会矛盾层层堆积。 6.舆论管控反噬 舆论压制导致民间怨气积聚,形成“表面稳定、暗潮涌动”格局。 7.长远国家竞争力受损 创新力、社会活力、文化创造力枯竭,国家逐渐丧失竞争优势。 三、利民型国家的治政核心原则 真正现代国家治理,必须确立四大利民治政原则: 1. 民生优先原则 财政优先保障民众基本生活质量,医疗、教育、住房、就业、养老。 2. 权利保障原则 宪法保障公民知情权、表达权、参与权、监督权。 3. 公共财政阳光原则 预算、支出、政务信息公开透明,纳税人有权全程监督。 4. 权力有限原则 国家权力受法律约束,公权力仅为公共利益服务,不能私有化、工具化、家长继承化。 四、合理国家治理结构体系图谱 构建合理国家治理体系,需确立“三元共治、双向制衡”结构: 权力主体 职能定位 监督关系 国家政府 宏观安全、财政调控、立法、外交 受公民、媒体、议会监督 公民社会 行业治理、社群事务、民间组织 受法治约束,拥有公共决策参与权 公民个人 政策投票、监督权、知情权 直接监督国家权力、参与事务治理 五、现代公务员制度彻底革新标准 国家公务员,应具备以下标准: […]

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025

I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]

read more

Related Content

Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 25, 2025
Traditional education often categorizes learning based on subjects, audiences, and teaching methods, focusing mainly on passing knowledge and developing skills. Quality education, however, takes a broader view. It looks beyond just academic success to focus on personal and social fulfillment, along with long-term happiness and success. It emphasizes not only gaining knowledge but also developing […]
In Quality Education, Every child is an A
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 27, 2024
The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]
When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation
When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 2, 2025
“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute. Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters […]
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
View All Content