Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets

Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]

 

On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has its unique logic and value orientation, which shape people’s attitude towards life and their approaches.

First Level: the Grassroot Mindset

Grassroots mindset is based on a public mentality. For people thinking in this way, life has no clear goals. All the efforts and struggles are for the better now. They may seek daily comfort, short-term happiness, or simple satisfaction, prioritizing immediate enjoyment over long-term planning. As a result, they are more likely to go with the flow in life, lacking a long-term vision and profound reflection on life.

Grassroots thinking is often prevalent at the lower levels of society, as it is closely related to urgency in pursuing immediate profits and safety. Under the pressures of life, many people would choose this mindset, because it is simple, direct, and provides a sense of content in the short term. However, the downside of grassroot thinking is also obvious. It traps individuals in complacency, dilutes their ambition and makes it difficult to break free from their current lifestyle and self-perception.

Grassroots thinking isn’t limited to those at the bottom of society; many people with social resources also fail to plan effectively and think long-term. A notable example is the Roman Emperor Nero, notorious for his extravagant lifestyle and indulgence. His reign was marked by a lack of clear political goals or a vision for the future, as he prioritized personal pleasure over state affairs. Nero had a deep passion for music and the arts, often performing on stage, while remaining indifferent to governance. During the Great Fire of Rome, there were rumors that he played the lyre and sang while the city was engulfed in flames.

Nero’s behavior represents the shortsightedness and self-centeredness of grassroots thinking. He lacked higher ideals or a sense of social responsibility, focusing solely on personal sensory pleasures, which ultimately led to public rebellion and his own downfall. His rule is also considered a significant reason for the decline of the Roman Empire due to its extravagance and brutality. This shows that when grassroots thinking manifests in those in power, the dangers are even greater; without vision and responsibility, it can lead to a dual failure for both individuals and society.

Second Level: the Elite Mindset

Elite thinking is based on seeking “the best” and “the extraordinary” in the mainstream values. Life is no longer about easy pleasures but money, power, and social status. For people with this mindset, one can gain whatever they want through ongoing efforts and relentless attempts. Therefore, these people tend to have clear goals and strive to improve personal values and achieve success.

This mindset is often found among those who grow up with financial advantages or privileged backgrounds, but also among people who work hard to improve themselves. Elite thinking drives people to push their limits and become a go-getter for higher achievements and social status. However, these people often place too much emphasis on personal success and social recognition, which may lead to a disconnection from inner needs and the deeper meanings of life. It might also cause a lack of compassion for others and emotional coldness, making it difficult for them to connect genuinely with themselves and others.

Napoleon Bonaparte is a prime example of elite thinking. He started out in a humble background but worked tirelessly and showcased incredible military skills to become the Emperor of the First French Empire. His main goal was to build a powerful empire through constant warfare and expansion, driven by his personal ambitions. Throughout his career, he faced numerous challenges and was fueled by his ambition, rising from an ordinary officer to the emperor who ruled over Europe, always chasing the heights of power.

Napoleon’s elite thinking is reflected in his desire for power and relentless pursuit of achievement. Through his personal efforts and leadership abilities, he gained widespread social status and historical influence. However, his failures also remind us that an excessive pursuit of material wealth and power can lead to the neglect of other important values.

Third Level: the Extraordinary Mindset

The core idea behind the extraordinary mindset is all about “love and compassion.” In this way of thinking, life doesn’t necessarily have a specific goal. However, because they deeply understand the struggles of others, people often feel empathy and a desire to help those in need. At their heart, those with this mindset aim to serve others and ease their suffering. This isn’t something forced upon them; it comes from a genuine understanding of human pain and a selfless concern for others.

Interestingly, people with an extraordinary mindset often come from humble backgrounds rather than privileged ones. Their life experiences give them a deep understanding of life’s struggles, which drives them to take on responsibility for others’ suffering instead of just looking out for their own interests. This mindset not only gives them strong inner strength but also helps them develop a broader perspective and a higher sense of purpose.

Mahatma Gandhi is a great example of the extraordinary mindset. Born into a regular family in India, he became a lawyer and had the chance to live a more comfortable life, but he chose to lead the fight for independence instead. He promoted the idea of “non-violent non-cooperation” and often went on hunger strikes to protest for the well-being of the people and social justice, willingly enduring physical pain. His goal wasn’t about seeking personal honor or wealth. Instead, he aimed to change society through his actions and help people break free from colonial oppression.

Gandhi’s extraordinary mindset shines through in how he put love and compassion at the center of his actions, rising above personal interests. He was committed to serving humanity and tackling social injustices and suffering. His ideas and actions have had a lasting impact, not just in India but also offering valuable inspiration for peace movements around the world.

Through the stories of these historical figures, we see various life attitudes and how different mindsets shape their paths and achievements. These mindsets influence individual lifestyles and leave distinct marks on history.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

空性是什么?从空智与达摩祖师的对话说起

Master Wonder · Feb 12, 2025

在《达摩传》中,有这样一则意味深长的片段。 一日,僧人空智来到少林寺,恭敬地向达摩祖师顶礼,并请教佛法的空性。他拱手问道: “大师是达摩祖师吧?贫僧空智,对佛法的理解尚浅,愿请大师指点。心、佛以及众生,三者皆空。现象的执性亦是空,无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶,一切皆空。这般见解,可对?” 达摩静静地看着他,忽然伸手,在他头上重重敲了一下。空智被打得生疼,立刻皱眉道:“大师,你为什么打人?” 达摩微微一笑,淡然说道:“你既然说一切皆空,那何来痛苦?” 空智愣住,陷入沉思。片刻后,他喃喃道:“既然一切皆空,为何我仍然感到疼痛?若连痛苦都不能超越,这‘空’又有何意义?” 达摩缓缓说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。” 空智顿时领悟,合十叩拜。 何为“空”? 空智之所以困惑,是因为他落入了“理空”的执着。所谓“理空”,是从概念上理解空性,而未能亲证。 当他说“一切皆空”时,他所理解的“空”仍停留在语言之中,停留在“否定有”的层面。因此,当痛觉袭来,他的心识立刻生起“痛”的分别,反映出他的“空”并未真正落实。 “空”不是虚无,而是“无自性”。 佛法中的“空”并不等于虚无,而是指诸法无自性。世界上的一切事物,包括心、佛、众生,并非独立存在,而是相互依存、因缘和合之生灭显现。因此,所谓的“痛”也并非绝对存在,而是缘起而生。若执着“痛”为实有,则堕入实有论;若执着“痛”为虚无,则落入顽空论。 达摩的痛击,正是要破除空智的顽空见,令他直面自身的执着。真正的“空”并非否定“痛”的存在,而是超越“痛”所带来的分别。若能见到“痛”无自性,则“痛”即不碍“空”,“空”亦不碍“痛”。 “空”是一种超越对立二元的智慧 达摩所言:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物。”这一番话正是指向空性之实相。 “空”即自在,随缘不执 空智之“空”是消极的,他以为空性是否定一切的多元性。只要在概念上否定“我是我”,“痛不是痛”,就是契入空性。 然而,真正的空是超越、是圆融,是“无碍”的智慧。它不否定世间法,而是于世间法中自在无碍。就如同我是父亲,可我还可以是男人,老板、牧师、教师等等,这一切的身份和社会关系并不会束缚我。 譬如水,无形无相,因器成形,随缘而变。这正是“空”之妙用——它不是破坏存在,而是让存在不受束缚。 当空智执着于“无圣无凡、无善无恶”,他仍未超越对立。真正的“空”并不是去否定善恶,而是了知善恶皆缘起无自性,在缘起中自如行持。 正如六祖惠能所言:“前念不生即心,后念不灭即佛。”念起即随,念灭不留,即是随缘不执,空而不空。 达摩的一击,是慈悲的棒喝 达摩这一击,是顿悟之机,是破除概念之障。空智若仅停留在理论上探讨空性,便始终无法超越。唯有当他真正直面自心,感受“痛”之生灭,才能了知“空”不碍“痛”,“痛”亦即是“空”。 这正是禅门直指人心的风格——不落言诠,直入本源。若执着“空”而拒绝现象,便落入偏见;若执着“有”而迷失本性,亦是妄念。唯有“空”与“有”双融,才能真正契入佛法的智慧。 正如《心经》所言:“色即是空,空即是色。” 再谈达摩这一击,是禅门棒喝,是不假言辞的直接点悟。空智因痛而惊,显然,他的“空”仍停留在概念之中,未能真正超越世俗分别。这一击,让他不得不重新思考:“何谓空?为何痛?如果一切皆空,为何我仍在执着?” 空并非虚无,而是无自性 佛法所言的“空”,并不是对一切的否定,也不是单纯的“无”。若将空理解为“什么都不存在”,便堕入“断灭空”,此非正见。真正的空,是“无自性”——世间一切事物皆因缘和合而生,无独立不变的本体。 譬如水,若无风,它静如明镜;若风起,它便波涛汹涌。水的“相”在变,但水的“本质”却从未消失。世间万象皆如是——它们是暂时的显现,而非绝对的存在。 空智的错误,在于他仅仅停留在否定层面,以为“一切皆空”就是不承认圣凡、善恶、施受。然而,真正的空,不是去“否定”这些现象,而是超越对它们的执着。达摩这一击,便是要让空智看到,他所说的“空”并未真正融入自心。 在这里说明一下,空智、达摩与佛陀,无二无别,切不可认为空智修行低,而达摩就高,不要让相法迷惑自己的自性圆融无碍。 空的两重境界:理空与证空 1. 理空——概念上的理解 这是初学者常见的阶段,以思辨的方式去理解空性。例如,空智所言的“无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶”,正是典型的“理空”——从理论上否定对立,认为万法皆空。 然而,光靠概念无法破除执着。达摩之所以一击,是因为空智仍在“理”上,而未能亲身体验“空”。如果空智真的证悟空性,他即使感知到痛,也不会生起对痛的执着,更不会质问达摩“你为何打我?” 2. 证空——超越概念的直接体验 证空,并不是通过逻辑推演得出的结论,而是通过直观的觉悟——直接体认到“痛亦是空,空不碍痛”。换句话说,不是去否定痛的存在,而是从中看到痛的无自性、不可得。 证悟空性的境界,犹如镜子——它照见一切,但不执著于所映之像。圣人、凡夫,善恶、施受,皆如水中月、镜中花,有因缘便现,因缘灭则不留痕迹。 比如,想象你在一场暴风雨中行走,雨水拍打在你脸上,寒冷刺骨,然而你并不因此生气或痛苦。你知道,这场风雨只是暂时的,终会过去。你不再执着于那股冷风和雨水,而是安然接受它们的存在,感知它们的瞬息万变。 世间的是非、苦乐,不过是幻影,终将过去。若执着于这些,就如同在水上写字,终究徒劳无功。 达摩所言:看、听、知的真正含义 达摩最后说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。”这句话,正是对“空”最深刻的阐释。 在《维摩诘经》中,文殊菩萨问众菩萨:“如何入不二法门?”众菩萨各自回答,皆未彻底。最后,维摩诘默然不语。文殊叹道:“是乃真入不二法门。” 不落言说,才是究竟。不以分别心求空,而是自然安住于空,这才是“看、听、知”的真实境界。 如何践行空性? 佛法讲空,不是让人逃避现实,而是让人超越现实的束缚,活得更自在、圆融。真正的空性,是让人在生活中随缘而行,却不被境遇所困。《般若波罗蜜多心经》就是这样的书籍,让心灵觉悟,自性自觉。 1. 生活中的“空” 空,并不意味着消极无为,而是随缘不执。 面对困境时,若能看到“一切无自性,终归变化”,便能不沉溺于烦恼之中。 当有人批评你、欺骗你、误解你时,不执著于这些现象,你就不会生嗔恨心,亦不会因其而痛苦。 2. […]

The soul falls through ignorance, character through selfishness

Master Wonder · Feb 11, 2025

The Shared Origin of All Faiths is not just a theory but a path of cultivation and practice. Human growth is a process of awakening and a refinement of character. The soul descends into darkness through ignorance, while character erodes through selfishness. Ignorance is the absence of truth, a loss of clarity, while selfishness is […]

read more

Related Content

Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 2, 2025
On life’s long journey, each of us constantly faces choices — choices that ultimately shape our destiny. At the core, these choices often boil down to two distinct paths: one that chases wealth, fame, and material success, and another that seeks inner freedom and happiness, democracy and peace. Many people mistakenly believe that wealth and […]
Friendship in different life stages
Friendship in different life stages
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 6, 2025
On the journey of life, friendship is like a mirror—reflecting how much we have grown and how far we have come. From carefree childhood playmates to soul-level companions in our later years, friendship isn’t static—it evolves as our minds expand, our values shift, and our lives unfold. Like leveling up in a game (but with […]
Individual Effort And Empowering: 6 Interesting Points
Avatar photo
Daohe · Dec 31, 2024
In many societies, the narrative of individual effort reigns supreme. We are taught from a young age that hard work and perseverance are the keys to success. While this belief in the power of personal determination can be empowering, it often comes at the cost of ignoring the broader systemic forces that shape our lives. […]
View All Content