Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets

Avatar photo
Daohe · 10월 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]

 

On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has its unique logic and value orientation, which shape people’s attitude towards life and their approaches.

First Level: the Grassroot Mindset

Grassroots mindset is based on a public mentality. For people thinking in this way, life has no clear goals. All the efforts and struggles are for the better now. They may seek daily comfort, short-term happiness, or simple satisfaction, prioritizing immediate enjoyment over long-term planning. As a result, they are more likely to go with the flow in life, lacking a long-term vision and profound reflection on life.

Grassroots thinking is often prevalent at the lower levels of society, as it is closely related to urgency in pursuing immediate profits and safety. Under the pressures of life, many people would choose this mindset, because it is simple, direct, and provides a sense of content in the short term. However, the downside of grassroot thinking is also obvious. It traps individuals in complacency, dilutes their ambition and makes it difficult to break free from their current lifestyle and self-perception.

Grassroots thinking isn’t limited to those at the bottom of society; many people with social resources also fail to plan effectively and think long-term. A notable example is the Roman Emperor Nero, notorious for his extravagant lifestyle and indulgence. His reign was marked by a lack of clear political goals or a vision for the future, as he prioritized personal pleasure over state affairs. Nero had a deep passion for music and the arts, often performing on stage, while remaining indifferent to governance. During the Great Fire of Rome, there were rumors that he played the lyre and sang while the city was engulfed in flames.

Nero’s behavior represents the shortsightedness and self-centeredness of grassroots thinking. He lacked higher ideals or a sense of social responsibility, focusing solely on personal sensory pleasures, which ultimately led to public rebellion and his own downfall. His rule is also considered a significant reason for the decline of the Roman Empire due to its extravagance and brutality. This shows that when grassroots thinking manifests in those in power, the dangers are even greater; without vision and responsibility, it can lead to a dual failure for both individuals and society.

Second Level: the Elite Mindset

Elite thinking is based on seeking “the best” and “the extraordinary” in the mainstream values. Life is no longer about easy pleasures but money, power, and social status. For people with this mindset, one can gain whatever they want through ongoing efforts and relentless attempts. Therefore, these people tend to have clear goals and strive to improve personal values and achieve success.

This mindset is often found among those who grow up with financial advantages or privileged backgrounds, but also among people who work hard to improve themselves. Elite thinking drives people to push their limits and become a go-getter for higher achievements and social status. However, these people often place too much emphasis on personal success and social recognition, which may lead to a disconnection from inner needs and the deeper meanings of life. It might also cause a lack of compassion for others and emotional coldness, making it difficult for them to connect genuinely with themselves and others.

Napoleon Bonaparte is a prime example of elite thinking. He started out in a humble background but worked tirelessly and showcased incredible military skills to become the Emperor of the First French Empire. His main goal was to build a powerful empire through constant warfare and expansion, driven by his personal ambitions. Throughout his career, he faced numerous challenges and was fueled by his ambition, rising from an ordinary officer to the emperor who ruled over Europe, always chasing the heights of power.

Napoleon’s elite thinking is reflected in his desire for power and relentless pursuit of achievement. Through his personal efforts and leadership abilities, he gained widespread social status and historical influence. However, his failures also remind us that an excessive pursuit of material wealth and power can lead to the neglect of other important values.

Third Level: the Extraordinary Mindset

The core idea behind the extraordinary mindset is all about “love and compassion.” In this way of thinking, life doesn’t necessarily have a specific goal. However, because they deeply understand the struggles of others, people often feel empathy and a desire to help those in need. At their heart, those with this mindset aim to serve others and ease their suffering. This isn’t something forced upon them; it comes from a genuine understanding of human pain and a selfless concern for others.

Interestingly, people with an extraordinary mindset often come from humble backgrounds rather than privileged ones. Their life experiences give them a deep understanding of life’s struggles, which drives them to take on responsibility for others’ suffering instead of just looking out for their own interests. This mindset not only gives them strong inner strength but also helps them develop a broader perspective and a higher sense of purpose.

Mahatma Gandhi is a great example of the extraordinary mindset. Born into a regular family in India, he became a lawyer and had the chance to live a more comfortable life, but he chose to lead the fight for independence instead. He promoted the idea of “non-violent non-cooperation” and often went on hunger strikes to protest for the well-being of the people and social justice, willingly enduring physical pain. His goal wasn’t about seeking personal honor or wealth. Instead, he aimed to change society through his actions and help people break free from colonial oppression.

Gandhi’s extraordinary mindset shines through in how he put love and compassion at the center of his actions, rising above personal interests. He was committed to serving humanity and tackling social injustices and suffering. His ideas and actions have had a lasting impact, not just in India but also offering valuable inspiration for peace movements around the world.

Through the stories of these historical figures, we see various life attitudes and how different mindsets shape their paths and achievements. These mindsets influence individual lifestyles and leave distinct marks on history.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
歴史の発展における価値観――「塵芥のような人生」を乗り越えるために

歴史の発展における価値観――「塵芥のような人生」を乗り越えるために

Daohe · 9월 12, 2025

人生の意義と価値を問い直す 歴史とは、個人の意志とは無関係に、滔々と流れる大河です。その流れの中で、誰もが時代の巨大な歯車に轢かれながら生きています。ある者は自らを燃やし、文明を前進させるエンジンの燃料となります。一方である者は、責任を逃れて片隅で縮こまり、やがて時代に見捨てられ、腐敗し、塵芥となります。前者は後世に「力」を残しますが、後者は何一つ価値あるものを残しません。 ここで言う「塵芥」とは、文明が前進する過程で振り落とされ、もはや何の価値もエネルギーも持たなくなった存在を指します。これを人の一生に当てはめてみましょう。いかに自らを高潔で善良な人間だと思っていても、時代の前進に何一つ貢献しなければ、歴史という巨大なエンジンにエネルギーとして取り込まれ、そして不要物として捨てられる運命にあるのです。 一、動力の価値:文明における唯一の尺度 個人の価値を測る上で、道徳、善悪、名声といったものは、しばしば幻影に過ぎません。歴史が真に認める基準は、ただ一つ。「動力」を提供したかどうか、という点です。 「動力」とは、抽象的な概念ではありません。具体的には、以下のような形で現れます。 動力とは文明の燃料です。たとえ小さな火花であっても、時代のエンジンに投じられれば、未来を照らすことができます。逆に、動力を生まない人間は、中立的な存在ではなく、文明にとって重い足枷となります。 二、塵芥の末路:無為な者の行き着く先 現代には、「悪事を働かなければ善人だ」と考える、善良な人間を自認する人々が溢れています。しかし、歴史は人を「善悪」で評価しません。「貢献」という基準でその価値を測ります。社会に置き換えれば、それは時代の恩恵を消費するだけで、一切の還元をしない人々のことです。 歴史は、「善人」だからといって名を刻むことはなく、「悪人ではない」からといってその無価値を許すこともありません。善悪を問わず、時代に動力を提供しない者は、最終的に社会という機械から排出される不要物となり、淘汰され、忘れ去られ、歴史から顧みられなくなるのです。 三、善悪を超えて:価値の真の判断基準 我々は人を「善人」と「悪人」に分けたがりますが、歴史の視点は異なります。 ある種の「悪人」は、結果として制度の改革を促し、間接的に動力となることがあります。ナポレオンは戦争屋でしたが、近代法治の礎となる「フランス民法典」をもたらしました。 ある種の「善人」は、行動を欠いたがゆえに、歴史に埋もれていきます。第二次世界大戦中、ヨーロッパの数百万の傍観者たちは、ユダヤ人が虐殺されるのを見て見ぬふりをしました。彼らは個人としては「善良」だったかもしれませんが、歴史が記憶しているのは抵抗者と解放者だけです。 文明を前進させる「動力」こそが真の基準であり、善悪ではありません。歴史が求めるのは「道徳的なレッテル」ではなく、「動力のもたらす効果」です。時代を前進させる者は記憶され、ただ食糧と空気を消費するだけの者は、文明の代謝と共に塵芥として洗い流されます。 四、歴史の鉄則:塵芥は常に洗い流される 古今東西の歴史を見渡せば、塵芥のような人生の末路は明らかです。 文明が記憶するのは、それを動かした者だけであり、何もしなかった傍観者を記憶することはないのです。 五、現代への警告:「塵芥のような人生」の蔓延 一見繁栄しているかのような現代社会は、「塵芥のような人生」で満ち溢れています。 彼らは自己満足に浸り、自らを「善人」とさえ思っているかもしれません。しかし文明の視点から見れば、彼らは時代のエンジンとは何の関係もなく、未来によって洗い流される運命にあります。 六、「塵芥のような人生」を避けるための道筋 中国・前漢の時代、司馬遷は『報任安書』でこう述べました。「人固より一死有り、或いは泰山より重く、或いは鴻毛より軽し(人は誰でもいつか死ぬ。その死は、ある場合は泰山よりも重く、ある場合は鳥の羽よりも軽い)」。その価値は、追求する目標と意義によって決まるのです。 塵芥の人生を避ける方法は、決して難解ではありません。 たとえ貢献が微々たるものであっても、それが時代のエンジンの一部となるならば、その人生には意味が生まれます。貢献を拒否する者だけが、ただ流されていく「塵芥」となり、何の価値も残せず、誰からも記憶されないという末路を辿るのです。 結語 生命の意義は、善良であったかどうか、潔白であったかどうかにはありません。この時代に、ほんのわずかでもエネルギーを注いだかどうかにあるのです。動力には大小の差はあれど、誰もがそれを生み出すことができます。そして、その微小な貢献の総和こそが、文明を前進させる真の力なのです。 燃料としての生は、燃え尽きようとも栄光に満ちています。 塵芥としての生は、いかに潔白を装おうとも空しいものです。 動力となることでのみ、生命は文明に吸収されます。さもなければ、歴史が排出した塵芥に過ぎない存在となり、誰の記憶にも残らないのです。

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

Daohe · 9월 12, 2025

叙谈人生的意义与价值–看清粪便人生 历史是一条奔涌的长河,浩浩荡荡,不以个人意志为转移。在这个历史长河中,每一个人都身处于时代巨轮的碾压之下。有人燃烧自己,成为引擎的燃料,推动文明向前;有人则蜷缩在角落,不愿承担任何责任,最终被抛弃、被腐化,成为这个时代的粪便。前者留下力量,后者只剩恶臭。粪便,本是身体代谢的废物,不再具有营养和能量,只能被排出体外。若套用到人的一生,不论其自认为多么清高、多么善良,若未曾为时代的前行贡献力量,便注定被历史的胃肠道消化后丢弃。 一、动力的价值:文明的唯一尺度 在个人价值与社会价值的衡量中,道德、善恶、名誉,往往只是幻影。真正被历史认可的标准,只有一个:你是否提供了动力。动力不是抽象的,它体现在:  科技的探索者,让世界的认知边界不断拓展;科技动力:牛顿、爱因斯坦改变人类认知;硅谷创业者推动世界进入数字时代。 制度的建设者,让社会秩序更加稳固和公平;制度动力:美国宪法、法国人权宣言、北欧福利制度,让公民的权利被制度化。 文化的创造者,让人类的精神生活不断丰盈;文化动力:莎士比亚、陀思妥耶夫斯基、鲁迅,用文字刺破人心,点燃新的思想火种。 公益的践行者,让弱者也能在光中行走。公益动力:白求恩、特蕾莎修女、无数志愿者,在苦难之地让文明的光照亮弱者。 社会组织事业的践行者,让人都在组织中成长。社会动力:只有社会组织才是我们最小的社会单位,任何人在组织中才能发出最灿烂的创造之光。 动力是文明的燃料。哪怕只是一点火星,投入时代引擎,也能点亮无数未来。而没有动力的人,不是中立者,而是沉重的负担。 二、粪便的命运:无所作为者的归宿 在这个时代,许多人自以为善良,认为“不作恶就是好人”。然而,历史的标准从不以“善恶”来衡量一个人,而是以“贡献”来审视其价值。对应到人类社会,就是那些只消耗时代供养,却从不回馈时代的人。 无所作为的好人:他们自诩清白,不作恶,但也从不创造。他们的存在就像空气中的浮尘,随风消散,毫无痕迹。 自我沉溺的坏人:他们或许搅起浪花,但并未推动历史,只是被历史冲刷后腐烂。 冷漠的旁观者:他们不愿承受任何责任,以“中立”为借口,其实等同于自动退出文明进程。 历史不会因为你是“好人”就留名,也不会因为你“不坏”就赦免。论善恶,只要不提供时代动力,最终都将成为社会机器的排泄物,被淘汰,被遗忘,被历史嫌弃。 三、善恶之外:价值的真正判断 我们习惯把人分成“好人”和“坏人”,但历史的眼睛并不这样看。 一些所谓“坏人”,因推动了制度反思,反而间接成为动力。拿破仑虽是战争贩子,却带来《民法典》,成为现代法治的基石。 一些“好人”,因缺乏行动,反而湮没无闻。二战时期,欧洲数百万旁观者看着犹太人被屠杀,却无人伸手相助。他们或许“善良”,但历史只记住了抵抗者与解放者。 动力推动才文明的真正标准,而非善恶。历史要的,不是“道德标签”,而是“动力效应”。谁能让时代进步,谁就被铭记;谁若只消耗空气与粮食,就会化作粪便,随文明代谢被冲走。 四、历史的铁律:粪便总被冲走 纵观古今中外,粪便人生的命运早已昭示: 秦末农民:多数人选择苟且偷生,最终与暴政一同被湮没,唯有陈胜、吴广敢举义,才进入史册。 工业革命时期:成千上万工人机械般消耗生命,却毫无主体性,被机器和资本吞噬。最终,他们成了“被时代代谢”的一代,而提出工人权利的推动者,才被铭记。 二十世纪的冷漠者:无数国家里,那些既不反抗压迫,也不建设社会的人,活着如草芥,死后无一人记起。 文明只记住推动者,而不会记住无所作为的旁观者。   五、当代的警告:粪便人生正在泛滥 今天的世界,看似繁荣,却充斥着“粪便人生”: 把一生浪费在短视频麻醉与无意义消费上的人; 只顾个人安逸,却对公共事务冷漠的人; 只追求“清白”或“小确幸”,却拒绝承担责任的人。 他们或许自我感觉良好,甚至自诩为“好人”。但在文明视角下,他们与时代的引擎毫无关系,注定被未来冲走。 六、避免粪便人生的路径 东方中国两汉时期,司马迁在《报任安书》言:人固有一死,或重于泰山,或轻于鸿毛,用之所期、趋利异也。也给出了人生的价值取决于所追求的目标与意义,实际方法并不玄妙:1. 贡献哪怕一点点:在你的岗位上留下改进的痕迹,就是动力。2. 参与公共事务:哪怕只是为一次社区决策投票,也比冷漠旁观要强。3. 学习与创造:学习是吸收动力,创造是释放动力,两者缺一不可。4. 推动哪怕微小的文明进步:帮人守住诚信、传播知识、支持公益,支持社会组织事业都是点亮未来的火种。 哪怕贡献渺小,只要进入时代引擎,你的人生就有意义。唯有拒绝贡献的人,才会落得“粪便”的命运,被冲入下水道,臭气熏天,却无人愿再提起。 结语: 生命的意义,不在于你是否善良,不在于你是否清白,而在于你是否曾经给这个时代注入过哪怕一丝能量。动力有层级,但没有人被禁止提供。微小贡献的总和,正是文明前行的真正力量。 燃料之生,虽耗尽也光荣;粪便之生,虽自洁也卑贱。唯有成为动力,生命才能被文明吸收;否则,你只是历史的排泄物,臭气熏天,却无人再记起。

read more

Related Content

What is real success?
Avatar photo
Daohe · 10월 31, 2024
People are often obsessed with external standards of success, caught up in comparisons and competition, and view success as an end goal. However, for every human being, we are born successful. From the moment life first blooms, our life carries unique meaning and value. Regardless of wealth or status, our existence in this world is […]
How Kindness Can Revive Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · 1월 24, 2025
Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · 1월 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Avatar photo
Yicheng · 3월 2, 2025
On life’s long journey, each of us constantly faces choices — choices that ultimately shape our destiny. At the core, these choices often boil down to two distinct paths: one that chases wealth, fame, and material success, and another that seeks inner freedom and happiness, democracy and peace. Many people mistakenly believe that wealth and […]
View All Content