Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets

Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]

 

On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has its unique logic and value orientation, which shape people’s attitude towards life and their approaches.

First Level: the Grassroot Mindset

Grassroots mindset is based on a public mentality. For people thinking in this way, life has no clear goals. All the efforts and struggles are for the better now. They may seek daily comfort, short-term happiness, or simple satisfaction, prioritizing immediate enjoyment over long-term planning. As a result, they are more likely to go with the flow in life, lacking a long-term vision and profound reflection on life.

Grassroots thinking is often prevalent at the lower levels of society, as it is closely related to urgency in pursuing immediate profits and safety. Under the pressures of life, many people would choose this mindset, because it is simple, direct, and provides a sense of content in the short term. However, the downside of grassroot thinking is also obvious. It traps individuals in complacency, dilutes their ambition and makes it difficult to break free from their current lifestyle and self-perception.

Grassroots thinking isn’t limited to those at the bottom of society; many people with social resources also fail to plan effectively and think long-term. A notable example is the Roman Emperor Nero, notorious for his extravagant lifestyle and indulgence. His reign was marked by a lack of clear political goals or a vision for the future, as he prioritized personal pleasure over state affairs. Nero had a deep passion for music and the arts, often performing on stage, while remaining indifferent to governance. During the Great Fire of Rome, there were rumors that he played the lyre and sang while the city was engulfed in flames.

Nero’s behavior represents the shortsightedness and self-centeredness of grassroots thinking. He lacked higher ideals or a sense of social responsibility, focusing solely on personal sensory pleasures, which ultimately led to public rebellion and his own downfall. His rule is also considered a significant reason for the decline of the Roman Empire due to its extravagance and brutality. This shows that when grassroots thinking manifests in those in power, the dangers are even greater; without vision and responsibility, it can lead to a dual failure for both individuals and society.

Second Level: the Elite Mindset

Elite thinking is based on seeking “the best” and “the extraordinary” in the mainstream values. Life is no longer about easy pleasures but money, power, and social status. For people with this mindset, one can gain whatever they want through ongoing efforts and relentless attempts. Therefore, these people tend to have clear goals and strive to improve personal values and achieve success.

This mindset is often found among those who grow up with financial advantages or privileged backgrounds, but also among people who work hard to improve themselves. Elite thinking drives people to push their limits and become a go-getter for higher achievements and social status. However, these people often place too much emphasis on personal success and social recognition, which may lead to a disconnection from inner needs and the deeper meanings of life. It might also cause a lack of compassion for others and emotional coldness, making it difficult for them to connect genuinely with themselves and others.

Napoleon Bonaparte is a prime example of elite thinking. He started out in a humble background but worked tirelessly and showcased incredible military skills to become the Emperor of the First French Empire. His main goal was to build a powerful empire through constant warfare and expansion, driven by his personal ambitions. Throughout his career, he faced numerous challenges and was fueled by his ambition, rising from an ordinary officer to the emperor who ruled over Europe, always chasing the heights of power.

Napoleon’s elite thinking is reflected in his desire for power and relentless pursuit of achievement. Through his personal efforts and leadership abilities, he gained widespread social status and historical influence. However, his failures also remind us that an excessive pursuit of material wealth and power can lead to the neglect of other important values.

Third Level: the Extraordinary Mindset

The core idea behind the extraordinary mindset is all about “love and compassion.” In this way of thinking, life doesn’t necessarily have a specific goal. However, because they deeply understand the struggles of others, people often feel empathy and a desire to help those in need. At their heart, those with this mindset aim to serve others and ease their suffering. This isn’t something forced upon them; it comes from a genuine understanding of human pain and a selfless concern for others.

Interestingly, people with an extraordinary mindset often come from humble backgrounds rather than privileged ones. Their life experiences give them a deep understanding of life’s struggles, which drives them to take on responsibility for others’ suffering instead of just looking out for their own interests. This mindset not only gives them strong inner strength but also helps them develop a broader perspective and a higher sense of purpose.

Mahatma Gandhi is a great example of the extraordinary mindset. Born into a regular family in India, he became a lawyer and had the chance to live a more comfortable life, but he chose to lead the fight for independence instead. He promoted the idea of “non-violent non-cooperation” and often went on hunger strikes to protest for the well-being of the people and social justice, willingly enduring physical pain. His goal wasn’t about seeking personal honor or wealth. Instead, he aimed to change society through his actions and help people break free from colonial oppression.

Gandhi’s extraordinary mindset shines through in how he put love and compassion at the center of his actions, rising above personal interests. He was committed to serving humanity and tackling social injustices and suffering. His ideas and actions have had a lasting impact, not just in India but also offering valuable inspiration for peace movements around the world.

Through the stories of these historical figures, we see various life attitudes and how different mindsets shape their paths and achievements. These mindsets influence individual lifestyles and leave distinct marks on history.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

利民与利国之别:现代国家治理正道与秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家为何存在?不是为了口号、不是为了疆域、也不是为了GDP。 国家的存在意义,只在于保障公民基本权利、维护公民生活尊严、提升公民幸福指数。 若国家强大却百姓困苦,国家荣耀却公民焦虑,则这个国家必是空壳政体,强表弱里,表面繁荣,实则积弊丛生。 所以,厘清“利国”与“利民”的本质区别,并将“利民”确立为国家治理的唯一正当性,是现代国家稳定、公正、持久繁荣的前提。 一、利国与利民之间的矛盾是什么? 利国是指国家宏观战略、国家安全、经济增长、军事地位、国际影响力等系统性目标。 利民是指个体公民的收入水平、就业保障、住房医疗、言论自由、司法公正、公共福利、人格尊严、参与政治的权利。 二者本应统一,但在权力运作与国家意志实践过程中,常常出现以下结构性矛盾: 这些结构性矛盾是利国性政策最大的弊端,也是公民真正的敌人。 二、利国政策的风险有哪些? 有一些国家为保表面上的国家面子、外交强势,而选择去牺牲公民权利,久而久之,必然埋下七重风险,结果也一目了然: 1.社会信任体系崩塌 公民对政府、制度、执法、司法缺乏信任,政令失效。 2.贫富极化 资本集团借国家战略之名操控资源,财富向少数人聚集,贫者愈贫。 3. 政治合法性危机 国家公信力丧失,制度认同感坍塌,合法性来源逐渐流失。 4.社会焦虑蔓延 住房、就业、教育、养老、医疗成本高企,民众心理失衡。 5.公共政策僵化 少数权贵把持决策,政策缺乏修正机制,社会矛盾层层堆积。 6.舆论管控反噬 舆论压制导致民间怨气积聚,形成“表面稳定、暗潮涌动”格局。 7.长远国家竞争力受损 创新力、社会活力、文化创造力枯竭,国家逐渐丧失竞争优势。 三、利民型国家的治政核心原则 真正现代国家治理,必须确立四大利民治政原则: 1. 民生优先原则 财政优先保障民众基本生活质量,医疗、教育、住房、就业、养老。 2. 权利保障原则 宪法保障公民知情权、表达权、参与权、监督权。 3. 公共财政阳光原则 预算、支出、政务信息公开透明,纳税人有权全程监督。 4. 权力有限原则 国家权力受法律约束,公权力仅为公共利益服务,不能私有化、工具化、家长继承化。 四、合理国家治理结构体系图谱 构建合理国家治理体系,需确立“三元共治、双向制衡”结构: 权力主体 职能定位 监督关系 国家政府 宏观安全、财政调控、立法、外交 受公民、媒体、议会监督 公民社会 行业治理、社群事务、民间组织 受法治约束,拥有公共决策参与权 公民个人 政策投票、监督权、知情权 直接监督国家权力、参与事务治理 五、现代公务员制度彻底革新标准 国家公务员,应具备以下标准: […]

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025

I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]

read more

Related Content

Law or morality: which is the true measure of a civilized society?
Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 21, 2024
This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection […]
How Kindness Can Revive Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
View All Content