Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]

In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response mechanism that exerts the power of democratic union at school and social level and fundamentally prevents and deals with the problem. In this article, the purpose and details of this mechanism will be elaborated and well explained.

Understanding the Cause of Bullying

When it comes to the reasons of bully, practically everything is on the list. From collective characteristics including race, gender, religions to individual traits such as appearance, body size, clothes, accents and life style, all these features can be the “problem” with the victims. Fundamentally, the behaviors of bullying stems from a lack of tolerance. And when individual bullying escalates into group bullying, it becomes more about political siding.

The central figures in a bullying group usually enjoy the social power in the group, which may come from their appearance, status, popularity, and other desirable traits. While other students in the group typically feel the need to please the central figures by proving themselves through bullying. As for the onlookers, they refrain from helping the victim to avoid becoming targets themselves. In a word, bullying is essentially a loss of balance in political power. From this perspective, a highly effective way of saving the victims from the vicious circle of bullying is to introduce an external democratic power so as to balance the power struggle between victims and bullies.

Combating Bullying through a democratic approach

The key is to introduce and exert the power of democracy in a rational and reasonable way. For the past decades, we have witnessed the strength of democratic union in various campaigns against injustice and inequality. It is fair to say that broad political alliances and collective democratic efforts are crucial in reducing unfair phenomena and countering violence. And the same applies to school bullying. With an extensive attention to the problem, people will be more aware of the issue and more likely to take actions to help the victims.

Democratic struggle focuses on raising awareness and cutting down on discrimination and violence, while personal revenge can lead to extreme behaviors and causing further psychological problems for the victims. We want to avoid these undesirable outcomes and ensure students grow up in a supportive environment. Therefore, schools should provide a safe, inclusive, positive and constructive way for students to strike back against bullying.

Building an Intervention System at school-community-society level

Schools and communities need to work together to establish an extensive democratic intervention mechanism, in order to tackle bullying effectively and turn bullying into a force to promote the progress of social democracy. While many current solutions of school bullying focus on prevention and mediation, they overlook the power of democratic union among students themselves, which is the key to address the problem in a sustainable way.

First of all, schools should introduce a democratic pledge of anti-bullying for student organizations or school clubs, which should include clear definition of bullying and encourage student groups to stand against it. Student groups that sign the pledge promise to oppose any form of violence, discrimination and bullying, both within and outside their groups. If bullying occurs and the victim seeks help from the group, group members have the responsibility to reach out and support the victims. As a reward, the student groups that sign the pledge will gain opportunities or recommendation for both individual growth and group development. By involving the efforts of student organizations, schools will be able to create an extensive support network for the victims of bullying.

Once signing the pledge, group members must discuss and devise internal anti-bullying rules with the help of the school office — as a part of commitment. Different student groups have their own internal policies against school bullying. To avoid misuse of power and ensure justice, schools should form a committee of teachers, parents, student representatives and community members to review anti-bullying policies and supervise the operation of the system. There should be an anonymous reporting channels for students to report issues without fears.

When there are conflicts among group members, the leaders should take positive actions to settle the conflicts and offer help for members who are bullied. Victims outside these groups can also seek help from members, who have a responsibility to provide assistance. If the leaders or members are found to favor or protect the bully, or turn a blind eye to the bullying behaviors, they will have their rewards cancelled and be reported by the school.

Such an intervention system fully encourages mutual support among students and provides structured help for the victims of school bullying. On the other hand, the system integrates democratic processes into the anti-bullying framework. It also empowers students to engage in civic activities and understand the importance of democracy and collective action. This engagement can help students develop critical life skills, such as conflict resolution, empathy, and leadership, which are valuable beyond the school environment.

Providing Guidance and Care for Bullies

One potential concern is that the anti-bullying policies may pose a threat to the reputation of the bullies and lead to social exclusion for them. It is thus essential for policy makers to bear in mind that the anti-bullying mechanism targets at resolving bullying behaviors instead of punishing individuals. When educating the students on the impact of bullying, schools should encourage them to treat the bullies in a rational way, which is crucial for the bullies to reflect on and adjust their behaviors. When the issue is settled, both the bully and the victim should have the opportunity to access psychological support and guidance. The bullies should get counseling which helps them develop positive social skills and reintegrate into the school and community.

By establishing a robust intervention system, the phenomenon of school bullying will be greatly relieved. The system is designed as a sustainable method to strike against bullying. Its emphasis on democratic values and civic engagement will also cultivate a more inclusive, supportive and responsible school culture. If the mechanism is implemented in regions, states and even the whole nation, an extensive anti-bullying line will be built up, extending to communities and the whole society.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

现代伪善国度经济繁荣的秘诀“单一政策指令经济”

Kishou · May 23, 2025

在现代世界经济体系中,现代“奇迹型”国家里,经济似乎总是充满活力:数据光鲜、指标飘红、项目井喷、产业政策不断。而一切看似的“市场繁荣”,实际上却有着一个极为高效的运行秘诀——“单一的政府政策指令经济”。是的,这不是计划经济,也不是自由市场经济,而是一种更具适应性的混合体:政府发话,经济运转;民众听话,财富生成。 这种模式既不需要市场机制的复杂博弈,也无需企业家的冒险精神,更不需要什么公平竞争。只要政策一挥手,资金就能精准流向“重点领域”;只要你肯点头,资源立马倾斜到“鼓励产业”;只要企业听话,就能“获得补贴”,哪怕效率低、创新无、风险高也无妨。 这正是伪善国度经济的精髓所在——表面尊重市场,实则掌控一切。在这里,“自由经济”是用来安抚民众与骗取外资的口号,而真正起决定作用的,是一纸文件与一声命令。只要牢牢掌握话语权、审批权与财政分配权,就能永远保证财富在“值得拥有的人”手中循环。 至于那些梦想创新、自主、自由的市场参与者?对不起,财富游戏早有剧本,你的角色只是“配角”,或者更准确地说,是“交税的群众演员”。 在这样高明的制度安排下,国家看似在腾飞,政府不断积累财富,舆论鼓掌叫好,数据一路向上——一切都好得不能更好。除了民众,除了企业家,除了被管控的经济本身。 一、披着市场的外衣,抵制市场的灵魂 在现代伪善国度的经济舞台上,“市场”只是道具,真正的主角从不登台,却掌控全场。 为了稳住内外人心,他们总是高举“市场经济”的旗帜,宣称“我们坚持市场在资源配置中起决定性作用”,说得比唱的还动听。口头上赞美创新创业,出台各种“支持民营经济”的文件,仿佛即将进入自由竞争的黄金时代。 但转身之间,审批照旧垄断、许可证依旧紧握、融资通道层层设卡、资源价格政策操控如旧。民间资本想要生存,不是拼效率,不是比技术,而是看你是否“识趣”、是否“站好队”。一旦谁天真地真搞自由市场,那就如同裸泳者踏进了有鲨鱼的池塘——结局可想而知。 他们对市场活动的控制是精妙的,甚至艺术性的:允许你开公司,但不许你跑得快;让你活着,但不给你壮大;允许你赚钱,但最好不要赚得比官方更聪明。 自由的口号用来安民,真实的控制用来致富——当然,只是让权贵致富。 二、政策即法规,权力即价格:政府主导经济的“神迹”逻辑 在这些现代国度中,政策不是工具,而是上帝。经济学原理是参考,领导意图才是纲领。没有哪个产业是真正“自然发展”的,一切成长都必须经过“指定路线”。 此时,市场逻辑、价格机制、供需规律不过是象征性的术语,被一种名为“政治经济学”的混合体所吞噬。 “政治经济学”的本质,不是理论上的交叉学科,而是一切经济事务归属政治决策的遮羞布。土地归政策、资金归审批、市场归导向、创新归汇报,而一切失败归你,一切成功归它。 政策即价格,指令即投资,资源配给不是效率优先,而是忠诚优先;利润不是由市场决定,而是由接近权力的人分配。 这不是经济学,这是“政治经济炼金术”——既懂金钱流动,更懂权力布局。产业风口不是由供需决定,而是由“开会的意图”决定;投资回报不是由市场效率驱动,而是靠“靠山背景”托起。 更妙的是,他们还设立了众多“经济智库”,以学术外衣包装政策意志,让一切指令都披上“科学”的外壳。 “为政以术”的巅峰在于:不仅统管经济,还教会人们如何相信这一切理所当然。 于是,真正的企业家变成了“政策捕手”;产业升级变成了“造概念”;科技投入变成了“投领导所好”;研究院变成了“政策润笔中心”。 三、掏空民间经济,打造“听话者生存经济体” 在这套伪善经济系统里,最大的敌人,不是通货膨胀,不是全球贸易壁垒,也不是经济周期,而是——不听话的民营经济。 因为他们知道,真正的自由经济体,意味着企业有独立思想,有资本积累能力,有政治影响力。而这些,都会对“一元化的政治经济秩序”构成威胁。所以,最聪明的方式不是一刀切清除,而是温水煮青蛙式地掏空你、驯化你、改造你。 你想贷款?要符合“引导产业”;你想上市?得符合“价值导向”;你想扩张?先看看你有没有“政治风险”;你想活得长久?那你得“保持低调”。 最终,民营企业慢慢变成“政策依附型”,利润模式从“市场竞争”转向“跑关系得补贴”;经营逻辑从“提高效率”变成“懂得听话”;企业文化从“挑战不可能”,变成“按文件执行”。 这就是“听话者经济”:你不是被淘汰,是被教育;不是没机会,是你不够配合。而你最值得骄傲的资产,不是技术、不是产品,而是你身后的领导是谁。 四、制造“自由vs计划”的幻象,掩盖真正的贫瘠之源 为了掩盖真相,伪善国度非常擅长制造概念迷雾。他们故意向公众灌输一种二元划分:不是“自由市场”,就是“计划经济”;不是“放任资本”,就是“国家调控”。 他们从不提真正控制资源配置、阻碍财富创造的,是“单一的政府政策指令经济”——一个把政治权力当成经济引擎的制度结构。 在这种结构下,一切经济行为都像踩在地雷阵上:路线偏一点,就成“违规”;发展快一点,就成“风险”;独立说句话,就成“异议”;你越有实力,就越成为眼中钉肉中刺。  而所有人却在这种误导中自我催眠——以为计划经济是过去式,自由市场是目标,而当下的困境只是“转型期的阵痛”。 他们不知道,这种“政策主导+权力配置+伪自由外衣经济模式”的混合结构,才是真正的民众经济贫瘠之源。它不是暂时的妥协,而是一种精密设计;不是路径中的弯路,而是通向深渊的主道。 结语:繁荣是财富的幻觉,贫瘠枷锁是你的常态 当一个国家的经济繁荣需要靠政府政策成了唯一指令,当经济变成权力的附庸,当“听话”成了发展的前提时,这样的国家就不再是一个经济体,而是一座披着金色外衣的监狱。 财富,并不会在这样的体制中增长,它只会流向权力结构的顶端,变成一种抽干百姓血汗、扼杀企业精神、摧毁自由意志的装饰。 而这正是现代伪善国度的最大魔术:用“经济发展”的名义,建造“资源集中”的高墙;用“自由市场”的名词,实施“政治优先”的铁律。最终,让民众一边呼喊富强,一边走进永远贫瘠的深渊。 他们的财富,是你自由的代价;他们的稳定,是你创造力的牺牲;他们的制度,是你梦想的坟墓。 而他们之所以还能高喊“经济奇迹”,只因你还未醒来,还在为一纸补贴欢呼,为一次审批感恩,为一个许可证而俯身。 你若始终听话,他们就能一直富有。这,才是他们真正的繁荣之道。

非公民制度下的“苟且偷生”与公民制度下的“尊严荣耀”

Yicheng · May 21, 2025

世间的社会制度大致可分两类,一类叫非公民制度,一类叫公民制度。这两种制度,看似只是权力结构不同,其实背后决定了一个国家的国民性格、社会运行逻辑、人际交往方式,甚至连价值观、语言习惯、审美趣味都天差地别。 制度不同,社会走向不同,个体活法也截然不同。 一、非公民制度:人人苟且,处处潜规则,个个带面具 在非公民制度下,人活着的首要目标从来不是“尊严”“价值”“自由”“人格”,而是“安全”“饭碗”“平安度日”。这里没有公民,只有“顺民”“愚民”“奴民”。 所有人都活在权力之下,处在随时可能被碾压的恐惧里。久而久之,苟且偷生便成了全民共识。 这种社会里,法律是挂在墙上的装饰品,权力才是解决问题的最终手段。办事靠关系,升迁靠裙带,生存靠逢迎,个性靠埋藏,良知靠忍耐。所谓“识时务者为俊杰”“明哲保身”“多一事不如少一事”,成了人生圭臬。 每个人都活在层层潜规则里,公开规则没人信,私下规则没人敢明说。表面一团和气,背后尔虞我诈。谁敢坚持原则,谁就活不下去;谁敢据理力争,谁就被当成傻子,甚至被群起而攻之。 二、长期苟且,慢慢腐蚀的不只是尊严,是整个人性 苟且久了,麻木了,不仅不觉得羞耻,反而觉得是“处世之道”。人性本该有的勇气、正义感、责任心,慢慢被小心谨慎、明哲保身、事不关己替代。连人与人之间本应有的信任、善意、温暖,也都在防备、猜疑、算计中消耗殆尽。 具体表现如下: 一个制度的最大罪恶,不是压迫一代人,而是用苟且文化,毁掉几代人的人格和认知。 当所有人都默认苟且是唯一出路,整个民族就陷入了集体麻木,集体怯懦,集体失语。 记得东方之国有一位陈寅恪先生曾经说过一句话:我们这块土地,这些人终其一生大多所行不过“苟且”二字。所谓风光,不过是苟且有术,行路坎坷,不过是苟且无门。 三、公民制度:让人第一次真正像个人一样活着 而一旦进入公民制度,情况就彻底不一样了。公民制度意味着每个人拥有不可剥夺的基本权利,有权发声,有权选择,有权监督,有权参与国家事务,有权批评权力。人与人之间基于平等、规则、法律而存在,而不是靠关系、后台、圈子维系。 在这样的制度下,普通人第一次能带着尊严抬头挺胸活着,不用依附、不用巴结、不用装孙子。敢讲真话,不怕权贵,不用担心一条微博、一句牢骚、一张朋友圈就给自己招来麻烦。人与人之间的交往基于诚意、规则和契约,而不是靠拍马屁、攀关系。 人不再需要苟且偷生,社会不再靠潜规则维持秩序。权力受到限制,官员受公众监督,公民拥有表达权、知情权、选择权、抗争权。规则公开透明,能者上,庸者下,犯错就付代价,行善得尊重。 更重要的是,人性被还原,勇气被唤醒,良知被保护,一个个鲜活有血性的个体得以涌现,而不是一堆面无表情的行尸走肉。 四、愚民惧变,苟且者恨光明,奴性者反对觉醒 可遗憾的是,哪怕公民制度的优越性再明显,依然有大批人排斥它。因为他们早已适应了苟且偷生的环境,变得胆小、自私、麻木,甚至开始反感阳光。用所谓是法律来约束正义的到来,更有甚者把正义直接宣判为违法。 他们害怕透明的制度,害怕平等的规则,害怕说话要负责任,害怕失去特权小圈子,害怕要靠真本事吃饭。 所以一旦有人提出要建立公民制度,他们第一个跳出来反对,说“别折腾”“别学西方那一套”“安稳过日子最重要”。 他们真正害怕的不是制度改革,而是怕被公正公开的阳光照见自己的卑微、怯懦与肮脏。 这种人活得像奴隶,却怕自由,活得像行尸,却恨活人,活得像影子,却厌恶阳光。 五、制度好坏,决定民族兴衰,国运存亡 一个国家真正的兴旺,不是GDP多高,楼盖多大,脸面多好看,而是这个国家里普通人能不能有尊严地活着,有权利地说话,有担当地做人,有信心地子孙后代。而不是直接摆烂躺平。 非公民制度,注定养出一群奴性顺民,社会靠潜规则维持,个体靠虚伪苟且度日,最终毁掉人格、扭曲文化、埋葬未来。 公民制度,养出敢于担当、心有尊严、彼此信任、勇于担当的公民社会,哪怕暂时混乱,也比长久的苟且来得有骨气、有希望。 结语: 世上最深的悲哀,莫过于苟且偷生者久了,开始嘲笑有尊严的人。最恶的制度,不是杀人,而是剥夺人性。真正的国家大计,不是GDP翻番,不是高楼成群,而是让普通人不用苟且偷生,人人能带着尊严荣耀活着。 愿这片土地终有一天,行走其间者无须苟且,开口说话者无须畏惧,人人活得像个堂堂正正的人。

read more

Related Content

Shaping Children’s Mindset: The Power of Love and Experiences
Shaping Children’s Mindset: The Power of Love and Experiences
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
A child’s growth is not merely about physical development. It’s more about the extension and growth of their thinking and perception. When it comes to education, we often focus on accumulating knowledge and help children develop concrete and abstract thinking skills to better study knowledge. However, gaining knowledge is not the whole picture of cognitive […]
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
In Quality Education, Every child is an A
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 27, 2024
The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]
Social Quality Education Will Break the Monopoly of Knowledge and Education and lead to a Shared Future
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 29, 2024
In recent decades, education has gradually shifted from traditional book-based learning to technology-based education, with the rise of artificial intelligence adding to the momentum. Knowledge is now easier to access, and global democratization is becoming more evident. In this context, focusing solely on the gaining of knowledge and skills no longer meets future needs. There […]
View All Content