Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]

In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response mechanism that exerts the power of democratic union at school and social level and fundamentally prevents and deals with the problem. In this article, the purpose and details of this mechanism will be elaborated and well explained.

Understanding the Cause of Bullying

When it comes to the reasons of bully, practically everything is on the list. From collective characteristics including race, gender, religions to individual traits such as appearance, body size, clothes, accents and life style, all these features can be the “problem” with the victims. Fundamentally, the behaviors of bullying stems from a lack of tolerance. And when individual bullying escalates into group bullying, it becomes more about political siding.

The central figures in a bullying group usually enjoy the social power in the group, which may come from their appearance, status, popularity, and other desirable traits. While other students in the group typically feel the need to please the central figures by proving themselves through bullying. As for the onlookers, they refrain from helping the victim to avoid becoming targets themselves. In a word, bullying is essentially a loss of balance in political power. From this perspective, a highly effective way of saving the victims from the vicious circle of bullying is to introduce an external democratic power so as to balance the power struggle between victims and bullies.

Combating Bullying through a democratic approach

The key is to introduce and exert the power of democracy in a rational and reasonable way. For the past decades, we have witnessed the strength of democratic union in various campaigns against injustice and inequality. It is fair to say that broad political alliances and collective democratic efforts are crucial in reducing unfair phenomena and countering violence. And the same applies to school bullying. With an extensive attention to the problem, people will be more aware of the issue and more likely to take actions to help the victims.

Democratic struggle focuses on raising awareness and cutting down on discrimination and violence, while personal revenge can lead to extreme behaviors and causing further psychological problems for the victims. We want to avoid these undesirable outcomes and ensure students grow up in a supportive environment. Therefore, schools should provide a safe, inclusive, positive and constructive way for students to strike back against bullying.

Building an Intervention System at school-community-society level

Schools and communities need to work together to establish an extensive democratic intervention mechanism, in order to tackle bullying effectively and turn bullying into a force to promote the progress of social democracy. While many current solutions of school bullying focus on prevention and mediation, they overlook the power of democratic union among students themselves, which is the key to address the problem in a sustainable way.

First of all, schools should introduce a democratic pledge of anti-bullying for student organizations or school clubs, which should include clear definition of bullying and encourage student groups to stand against it. Student groups that sign the pledge promise to oppose any form of violence, discrimination and bullying, both within and outside their groups. If bullying occurs and the victim seeks help from the group, group members have the responsibility to reach out and support the victims. As a reward, the student groups that sign the pledge will gain opportunities or recommendation for both individual growth and group development. By involving the efforts of student organizations, schools will be able to create an extensive support network for the victims of bullying.

Once signing the pledge, group members must discuss and devise internal anti-bullying rules with the help of the school office — as a part of commitment. Different student groups have their own internal policies against school bullying. To avoid misuse of power and ensure justice, schools should form a committee of teachers, parents, student representatives and community members to review anti-bullying policies and supervise the operation of the system. There should be an anonymous reporting channels for students to report issues without fears.

When there are conflicts among group members, the leaders should take positive actions to settle the conflicts and offer help for members who are bullied. Victims outside these groups can also seek help from members, who have a responsibility to provide assistance. If the leaders or members are found to favor or protect the bully, or turn a blind eye to the bullying behaviors, they will have their rewards cancelled and be reported by the school.

Such an intervention system fully encourages mutual support among students and provides structured help for the victims of school bullying. On the other hand, the system integrates democratic processes into the anti-bullying framework. It also empowers students to engage in civic activities and understand the importance of democracy and collective action. This engagement can help students develop critical life skills, such as conflict resolution, empathy, and leadership, which are valuable beyond the school environment.

Providing Guidance and Care for Bullies

One potential concern is that the anti-bullying policies may pose a threat to the reputation of the bullies and lead to social exclusion for them. It is thus essential for policy makers to bear in mind that the anti-bullying mechanism targets at resolving bullying behaviors instead of punishing individuals. When educating the students on the impact of bullying, schools should encourage them to treat the bullies in a rational way, which is crucial for the bullies to reflect on and adjust their behaviors. When the issue is settled, both the bully and the victim should have the opportunity to access psychological support and guidance. The bullies should get counseling which helps them develop positive social skills and reintegrate into the school and community.

By establishing a robust intervention system, the phenomenon of school bullying will be greatly relieved. The system is designed as a sustainable method to strike against bullying. Its emphasis on democratic values and civic engagement will also cultivate a more inclusive, supportive and responsible school culture. If the mechanism is implemented in regions, states and even the whole nation, an extensive anti-bullying line will be built up, extending to communities and the whole society.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

——跨越历史、文明与制度的制度性操控陷阱 引言:全球性悲剧,制度型设定 在今天的许多国家,不论是民主国家、威权体制,还是新兴政体,“公务员群体”的角色都被困于一种危险而悖谬的结构中: 既要求他们忠诚,却不给他们清白的空间; 既赋予他们权力,却不保障他们的人格; 既要他们维持秩序,却随时能将其当作代罪羔羊。 这种“制度牛马式人生”不是东方独有,也非威权特产,而是全球制度文明长期演化的副产品,是行政官僚体系内部固有的牺牲机制,具有全球普遍性与制度传承性。 一、从古代帝国到殖民体制:公务员的全球“牺牲性”起源 1. 古罗马与波斯帝国:忠诚工具人 vs. 权力收割机 古罗马帝国建立了全世界最早的大型文官系统之一,但这套系统的核心逻辑就是:“执行者无权,责任全责”。地方总督若不能维稳、征税、供应军粮,就可能被元老院弹劾、失职流放,甚至当街处死。 波斯帝国也是如此,其“御使”(即帝国巡查员)虽地位崇高,却是帝王“耳目”与“祭品”合一——一旦被怀疑忠诚动摇,先杀之而后问责。 2. 中世纪教权与王权体系:公务官僚的高压困局 在中世纪的西欧王权与教权共治体系中,王室“书记官”、教廷“执事长”都是顶级公务员,却也是最高风险承担者。许多“替主办事”的高级行政人员死于权斗、背锅与舆情清算。 如英格兰托马斯·贝克特,既是忠臣,也是“政治尸体”。 3. 殖民体系:全球外派官僚的双重囚笼 英、法、荷、西等殖民帝国在全球派驻大量殖民地行政官员,他们既要“平定土著、榨取税收”,又不能得罪母国议会和本地资本。这些人时常在殖民危机、起义失败、经济衰退中成为“第一批牺牲者”。 全球殖民史中的“倒霉总督”,是最真实的制度燃料使用记录。 二、近现代国家的“行政机器”:权力之中被去人格 1. 纳粹德国与苏联体制:制度牲畜的极致形态 在极权制度下,公务员几乎是制度的消耗品: 这种政体下的公务员,表面代表国家,实则是高压权力体系的第一轮牺牲群体。 2. 民主国家的替罪结构:舆情下的抛弃机制 即使在制度成熟的民主国家,公务员也并未逃离“可抛弃性命运”: 民主制度未必更温和,只是抛弃公务员的方式更“文明”。 三、现代“制度牛马”人生的五大特征:全球通行的“操控套件” 无论是在哪个国家,今天的公务员系统都呈现出一种高度相似的“可操控“制度牛马”系统结构”: 1. 权力与责任严重不对称 拥有有限执行权,却必须对政策失误、舆情崩盘、预算危机负责。真正的决策者“法律免责”,执行者则“程序问责”。 2. 收入与期望严重错位 全球多数国家的公务员收入不足以匹配其工作强度与公众期待,从而滋生合法之外的“灰色激励体系、即灰色收入”。 3. 忠诚与独立人格不可共存 在许多国家,“政治中立”与“制度忠诚”常常矛盾。一名公务员若太独立思考,便容易被视为“不合作份子”;若过度服从,又将失去社会信任。 4. 被制度诱腐,再被制度清算 制度在表面上鼓励清廉,但在实际中留下大量“可腐空间”作为控制手段。一旦需要清洗,就从中选出“替罪羊”以平息不满。 5. 最终成为社会愤怒的集装箱 无论是民众对贫富不均、治理失效、官僚作风的怨恨,最终往往集中喷向公务员无能、腐败、躺平、弱智、不作为,而不是资本权贵或体制高层。 四、为什么制度总要一个“可杀的执行群体”? 制度总要解决三个关键难题: 问题 制度对策 如何维持执行效率? 养一群服从且依赖体制的人 如何延长制度稳定性? […]

世界に普遍的に存在する二つの人生:「制度の歯車」としての人生と「制度の燃料」としての人生

世界に普遍的に存在する二つの人生:「制度の歯車」としての人生と「制度の燃料」としての人生

Kishou · Aug 29, 2025

——人生を理解する:グローバルな制度進化における共生のジレンマと、そこからの解放への道 序論:世界的な制度の罠と、二つの人生の普遍性 北米、ヨーロッパ、アフリカ、ラテンアメリカ、中東、そしてアジアの各地域に至るまで、世界の社会には、制度設計によって形作られた二つの人生モデルが普遍的に存在します。それは、公務員の「制度の歯車」としての人生と、大衆の「制度の燃料」としての人生です。この二つの生き方は一見すると無関係に見えますが、現代の制度という機械において不可欠な二つの歯車であり、国家と社会の運転を共に駆動させると同時に、制度がもたらす深層的な操作と抑圧を共に受け止めています。 グローバルな視野からこの問題に切り込み、二つの人生の共通点と相違点を明らかにすることでのみ、現代の制度文明が抱える苦境をより深く理解し、その解決の道を模索することができるのです。 一、公務員の「制度の歯車」人生:世界の執行者たちが置かれた板挟みの状況 1.地域を越えた共通点:権限は限定的、しかし責任は重い 2. 役割の矛盾:忠誠心と人格の抑圧 公務員は上層部の政策を厳格に執行することを求められますが、十分な意思決定権や人格的な尊重を欠いています。彼らは制度における「交換可能な部品」となり、いつでも排除されるリスクに晒されています。 二、大衆の「制度の燃料」人生:世界で消耗され続ける社会の主体 1. 経済的搾取と社会的疎外の普遍的な存在 2. イデオロギーと情報操作という世界的現象 大衆は、断片化されたメディア環境の中で情緒的に誘導され、制度の深層的な問題に対する認識を欠いています。その感情は容易に操作され、制度を安定させ、動かし続けるための「従順な燃料」となります。 三、対立の否定:文化を越えた理解の下での共生の現実 四、グローバルな視点からの制度再設計:公正と尊厳を目指して 結論:共生を認識し、共に制度の束縛から解放されるために 公務員の「制度の歯車」としての人生と、大衆の「制度の燃料」としての人生は、現代のグローバルな制度文明における普遍的な現象であると同時に、制度的な共生のジレンマでもあります。文化の違いを乗り越え、互いの状況を認識し、共に制度設計を改革することでのみ、世界の社会は誤解と対立から抜け出し、真の公正、尊厳、そして幸福を実現できるのです。

read more

Related Content

Social Quality Education Will Break the Monopoly of Knowledge and Education and lead to a Shared Future
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 29, 2024
In recent decades, education has gradually shifted from traditional book-based learning to technology-based education, with the rise of artificial intelligence adding to the momentum. Knowledge is now easier to access, and global democratization is becoming more evident. In this context, focusing solely on the gaining of knowledge and skills no longer meets future needs. There […]
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 25, 2025
Traditional education often categorizes learning based on subjects, audiences, and teaching methods, focusing mainly on passing knowledge and developing skills. Quality education, however, takes a broader view. It looks beyond just academic success to focus on personal and social fulfillment, along with long-term happiness and success. It emphasizes not only gaining knowledge but also developing […]
Learning and Career Success
Learning and Career Success
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 2, 2024
Education has traditionally been seen as a gateway to job opportunities, but it falls short in today's fast-changing world. In the modern workforce, employment is a platform for continuous learning and professional development, offering hands-on experience, problem-solving, collaboration, and opportunities for growth and innovation.
View All Content