Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

社会组织中的家庭组织:婚姻观念的历史性变迁

Yicheng · Feb 22, 2025

从封建到现代:婚姻观念的历史性转变 婚姻自古以来便是社会的基石,承载着人与人之间的情感、责任与文化传承。然而,在封建社会中,婚姻制度深受性别和阶级不平等的影响,尤其是“男方付出礼金”的习俗,体现了封建社会对女性的物化与家庭之间的经济交换关系。 随着时代变迁、社会思想的进步,以及社会公民资本市场经济体制的发展,婚姻的本质和社会功能正在发生深刻变革。从封建婚姻到现代平等婚姻,再到未来的社会公民资本市场经济体制下的社会共同责任婚姻,婚姻已不再只是个人或家庭的事务,而逐渐成为社会整体发展的重要组成部分。 一、封建制度国家的非公民婚姻:男方付出礼金的婚姻交易模式 在封建社会,婚姻不仅仅是个人情感的结合,更是家族利益的延续。男方支付礼金不仅是一种经济行为,更体现了男性在婚姻中的主导地位,而女性则被视为家庭资产的一部分。 礼金的本质是一种“交换”,即男方以金钱换取女方的归属权,这使得女性在婚姻关系中处于被动地位。女性的婚姻价值往往由家族背景、社会阶层以及经济能力决定,而非个人的意愿、能力或情感需求。婚姻决策往往掌握在长辈手中,个人的自由选择权被极大地压缩。 然而,随着女性社会地位的提高、教育的普及以及法治的发展,人们开始质疑这种基于经济交易的婚姻模式。现代社会更加强调个体价值和自由意志,越来越多的年轻人摒弃了礼金传统,婚姻逐渐回归到情感、理解与责任的基础之上。 二、资本制度国家的国家公民婚姻:双方面的平等付出 在资本制度国家,婚姻从一种家族契约演变为个人之间的平等合作关系。在这一体系下,婚姻的核心不再是家族利益的交换,而是双方基于情感、经济与社会责任的共同承诺。 现代婚姻的变化体现在多个方面: 这种双方面的付出,使婚姻从封建社会的单向交换关系,转变为更加稳定和公平的合作模式。 三、社会公民资本市场经济体制下的社会公民婚姻:社会共同的责任 随着社会的进步,婚姻不再仅仅是个体之间的承诺,而是社会整体发展的重要组成部分。在社会公民资本市场经济体制下,婚姻被纳入社会责任体系,国家、社会与家庭共同承担婚姻的稳定与发展。 这一体系下的婚姻制度具有以下特征: 在这一体系下,婚姻的稳定不仅是夫妻双方的责任,更是整个社会的责任。 社会不再是婚姻的旁观者,而是通过制度保障婚姻的健康发展,使婚姻成为社会共同繁荣的一部分。 结语 婚姻制度的演变,是社会进步的重要体现。从封建社会的经济交换婚姻,到现代资本制度下的平等婚姻,再到未来的社会公民资本市场经济体制下的社会责任婚姻,婚姻的本质不断被重塑。 现代婚姻的发展趋势表明,婚姻不仅是个人的事情,更是社会整体运作的一部分。未来,婚姻制度将在更加公平、共享、责任共担的基础上,迎来新的发展阶段。

read more

Related Content

The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content