Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

過去を手放してこそ、再生は始まる

過去を手放してこそ、再生は始まる

Kishou · Feb 20, 2025

「昨日はすでに歴史となり、明日は依然として未知である。ただ今日という日だけが、天からの授かりものである」 人生という旅路において、過去を振り返ることはよくある行為です。多くの人々は、記憶の奥深くに留まり、過去の輝きや後悔の中に浸ることに慣れてしまっています。しかしながら、過去を振り返ることは、自分自身をそこに縛り付けることを意味するのではありません。私たちが過去を振り返るのは、そこから得た教訓や啓示をよりはっきりと見るためであり、過去の影が現在と未来を覆い続けるのを許すためではない、という点にあります。 過去を振り返るのは、物事を明らかにするため。過去を置き去りにするのは、明晰になるためです。過去に対する内省を通じてのみ、私たちはかつての過ちから教訓を汲み取り、かつての成功から経験を抽出し、自らの未来のためにより明確な道を敷くことができるのです。 しかし、内省とは、過去に長時間留まることではありません。知恵と洞察力をもって、すでに過ぎ去ったものへの囚われを手放すことを学び、そうして初めて、未来の挑戦と機会を迎え入れることが可能になるのです。 一、過去の経験は、私たちが成長するための豊かな土壌である 過去は、私たちが変えることのできない歴史ですが、私たちの人生に深遠な影響を与えています。一つひとつの過ち、一つひとつの失敗、一つひとつの選択が、目に見えない形で今日の私たちを形作っているのです。それらは、私たちの思考に豊かな養分を供給し、私たちの行動に必要な内省の機会を提供してくれます。 しかし、内省とは、ひたすら自分を責めたり、誰かを恨んだりすることではありません。経験から教訓を学び、同じ過ちを繰り返すのを避けることです。かつて失敗した決断は、今後の選択において、私たちをより慎重にさせてくれるかもしれません。かつて受けた傷は、私たちをより強靭にしてくれるかもしれません。 このプロセスにおいて、過去は重荷ではなく、一種の財産です。それは、私たちが一つひとつの決断と行動において、より賢明な選択をするのを助けてくれるのです。 二、過去に留まることは、未来を束縛することである 過去の経験が重要な意味を持つとはいえ、もし私たちが常に過去に留まっていれば、自らの思い出によって縛られてしまうでしょう。この状況は、ずっと鏡の中の自分を見つめているうちに、目の前の美しい風景を見逃してしまうのに似ています。私たちがすでに消え去った時間を振り返り続けている時、私たちの目は前方の道を見ることができません。その時、私たちの心もまた、過去の憂いや喜びに悩まされ、今この瞬間の生活に全身全霊で打ち込むことができなくなります。 哲学者のハイデガーが述べたように、「人間は未来に向かって存在する」のです。私たちは未来に目を向け、その視線を過去から、まだ訪れていない日々へと移すべきです。過去の足枷を手放して初めて、私たちは真の自由を手にし、自らの理想の未来を創造することができるのです。 もし私たちがずっと過去に留まっていれば、現在の素晴らしさを体験することも、未来の到来に備えることもできません。 三、いかにして過去を置き去りにし、明晰な未来へと歩むか 「過去を置き去りにする」とは、忘れることを意味するのではありません。それは、心のレベルで、もはや過去の出来事に自らの感情や選択を支配させない、ということです。過去を手放すことは、内面的な解放であり、苦しみの影の中に、光を見出すことです。 まず、私たちは自分自身と他人を許すことを学ばなければなりません。人生において、過ちを犯したり、他人から傷つけられたりすることは、避けられません。過去の過ちや傷に過度にとらわれ続けることは、私たちをさらに重くするだけだと、正しく理解する必要があります。許し、手放す中で、私たちは真の自由と、思考の次元を高める機会を得るのです。 次に、私たちは今この瞬間に、積極的に自らの未来を築く必要があります。未来の可能性は無限です。私たちにできるのは、現在の自分を磨くことに集中し、自分を変えることができる機会を有効に掴むことです。一つひとつの学び、一つひとつの進歩、一つひとつの繰り返しが、未来へと向かう一歩となるのです。 最後に、人生には壮大な目標が必要です。そうして初めて、生命は価値あるものとして輝きます。私たちは、ただ頭数を揃えるために、この世に来たのではありません。壮大な目標は、私たちが前進するための原動力であり、過去の暗雲から抜け出すための光です。 どれほど困難であっても、夢と目標に自らの歩みを導かせなければなりません。目標を追いかける過程で、私たちは、過去の様々な悩みが次第に色褪せ、未来への希望がますます鮮明になり、一日一日をより着実に、そして豊かに生きている自分に気づくでしょう。 結語 過去を振り返るのは、物事を明らかにするため。過去を手放すのは、明晰になるためです。過去がどのようなものであったとしても、私たちはそこから教訓を学び、それを前へ進む力へと転換させるべきであり、歩みを引き止める足枷にしてはなりません。 一人ひとりの人生は、絶えず前進し続ける旅です。過去は足元の礎であり、未来は前方の山頂です。過去の荷物を絶えず手放していくことによってのみ、未来への道のりを、より遠くまで歩んでいくことができるのです。

التخلي عن الماضي يُعد شرارة الانطلاق

التخلي عن الماضي يُعد شرارة الانطلاق

Kishou · Feb 20, 2025

الأمس تاريخ، والغد لغز، واليوم هدية مع تقدمنا في الحياة، يصبح من الطبيعي أن نُمعن النظر إلى الوراء. كثير من الناس يظلون متمسكين بذكرياتهم، سواء بالاحتفاظ بنجاحات الماضي أو بالغرق في الندم. لكن التأمل في الماضي لا يعني الوقوف عنده؛ فالهدف الحقيقي هو التعلم من تجاربنا واكتساب الحكمة، لا السماح للماضي بتثبيتنا عن العيش في […]

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
View All Content