Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Can People Rely on the Government to Achieve Economic Prosperity?

Kishou · Jan 22, 2025

When it comes to economic regulation and reducing the wealth gap, many people tend to place the responsibility on the government. As the central entity of macroeconomic control, the government certainly plays a crucial role in promoting economic balance through a series of policies and measures. However, is this reliance enough? Can it truly lead […]

経済の繁栄は政府だけに頼れるのか?

Kishou · Jan 22, 2025

経済対策や貧富の差を縮める取り組みについて語られる際、しばしば「政府がもっと積極的に対応すべきだ」という意見があがります。政府はマクロ経済の調整主体として、さまざまな政策を通じて経済のバランスを保つ役割を担っていますが、果たしてそれだけで十分でしょうか。長期的な経済繁栄を本当に実現できるのか、改めて考えてみる価値があるかもしれません。 政府による経済調整の現状と課題 多くの国では、税制や財政政策、法律などを活用して経済状況をコントロールしようとしてきました。たとえば日本の 法人税(Corporate Tax)は企業の利益に直接課税する仕組みで、富裕な企業から財源を集め、必要な社会分野へ再配分する狙いがあります。一方、アメリカでは 累進所得税 を導入し、高所得層がより多くの税負担を負うことで、低所得者向けの公共サービスを充実させる取り組みも行われています。 それでも浮上する課題: 効率の低下とムダ遣い:政府能力の限界 こうした税収の再分配だけでなく、政府が行う経済調整の非効率さもたびたび問題視されています。 2008年の金融危機後、アメリカは大規模な量的緩和に踏み切り、短期的には経済を安定させましたが、資産価格の高騰や富裕層とそれ以外の格差拡大を招いたとも指摘されています。 政府調整の限界を示す事例:日本と欧米 過去の事例を見ても、政府の経済政策だけではうまく解決できなかったケースが少なくありません。たとえば日本では、プラザ合意に伴う急速な円高がバブル経済とその崩壊を招き、「失われた30年」を経験することになりました。こうした流れから、政府に大きく依存する体制には限界があると見る人も増えています。 欧米諸国でも、こうした課題は決して珍しいものではありません。たとえば、2008年の金融危機後に欧州圏で起きた主権債務危機では、一部の国が厳しい財政緊縮策を余儀なくされました。これによって一時的に安定は得られたものの、長期的には経済成長が伸び悩み、ギリシャやスペインなどでは失業率の高さが深刻化するといった問題を抱えることになりました。 経済の繁栄に新しいアプローチが必要 それでは、経済繁栄を政府だけに期待するのは現実的ではないのでしょうか。私たち一乗公益が考えるのは、 いいえ、「政府の役割は重要だが、単独で十分というわけではない」ということです。 これからの時代に必要とされるのは、政府・企業・個人・社会組織がそれぞれ主体的に関わり合う、より多層的な仕組みだといえるかもしれません。 社会主体の経済調整という可能性 もし社会団体や企業が経済の調整にもっと関与するようになれば、次のようなメリットが見込まれます: こうした変革をどう実現するか もちろん、社会全体の仕組みを変えていくには長い時間と試行錯誤が必要でしょう。とりわけ、大きな資本を持つ企業や投資家とのパワーバランスを、一般の人々がどのようにして保っていけるのかという課題も浮上するかもしれません。 そこで私たち一乗公益では、「社会公民金融」という新たな経済モデルを提案しています。この仕組みでは、ブロックチェーンなどの分散型技術を活用し、誰でも経済調整に参加でき、経済的な成長の恩恵を公平に享受できる可能性を目指しています。 もしご興味をお持ちでしたら、「社会公民金融」に関する記事もぜひご覧ください。今後も、この新しい時代における経済繁栄のあり方について、さらに詳しくお伝えしていきたいと思います。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content