Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

经济繁荣可以依靠政府吗?

Kishou · Jan 22, 2025

当谈到经济调控和减少贫富差距时,很多人会将责任归结到政府身上。政府作为宏观调控的核心主体,确实通过一系列政策和措施在推动经济平衡方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这种依赖是否足够?是否能够真正实现长久的经济繁荣?这一问题值得我们深入探讨。 政府调控的现状与挑战 各国政府长期以来通过税收、财政政策和法律法规来实现经济调控。例如,日本实施的 法人税(Corporate Tax)就是一种直接针对企业盈利能力的税收手段,旨在从富裕的企业中提取资源,再分配给社会中需要支持的领域。类似地,美国也通过 累进所得税 制度,让高收入群体承担更多税负,为社会底层提供更多公共服务。 尽管这些政策在理论上看似完善,但在实际执行中面临诸多挑战: 效率低下与浪费:政府能力的边界 不仅仅是税收分配效率的问题,政府在经济调控中的低效表现也愈发受到关注。 此外,美国在2008年金融危机后推出的大规模量化宽松政策,虽然在短期内稳定了经济,却也被批评为推高了资产价格,加剧了贫富差距。 政府能力的局限性:日本与欧美的案例 历史上,政府经济调控中的局限性屡见不鲜。以日本为例,广场协定的签订导致日元迅速升值,从而触发了经济泡沫的形成与破裂。之后的“失落的三十年”,证明了过度依赖政府调控的局限性。 在欧美国家,类似的问题也并不少见。例如,欧元区在2008年金融危机后的主权债务危机中,一些国家被迫接受严厉的财政紧缩政策。这种政府调控带来的短期稳定,却引发了长期的经济增长乏力,尤其是希腊、西班牙等国的高失业率问题。 经济繁荣需要新的思路 面对政府调控的种种挑战,我们需要重新思考一个问题:经济繁荣是否只能依靠政府?我们一乘公益的答案是 不,政府调控固然重要,但远远不够。 未来的经济繁荣需要政府、企业、个人和社会组织的共同参与。这种多元化的参与机制,意味着以下几点: 以社会为主导的经济调控可能性 如果社会组织和企业逐渐参与到经济调控中,我们可以预见以下可能: 如何实现这样的转变? 当然,这一转变需要长时间的探索与实践。对于没有庞大资本的个人来说,如何避免被巨头资本压制?这一问题的答案,可能在新的金融形式中找到。 社会公民金融 是我们一乘公益提出的未来经济模式之一。在这种模式下,人人都可以通过去中心化的方式参与到经济调控中,并真正享受经济繁荣带来的红利。 如果您对此感兴趣,可以阅读我们关于“社会公民金融”的专题文章,我们将持续展开这一话题,为您展现新时代经济繁荣的可能性。

How capitalism’s financial system intensifies class immobility

Kishou · Jan 20, 2025

Modern finance is rife with inequality. Ordinary individuals are left at an informational and resource disadvantage, increasing their financial risks in investment. In contrast, capitalists exploit insider knowledge and market control to generate massive gains, widening the gap in wealth and solidifying class divides. Urgent reforms are necessary to curb these injustices.

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content