Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

The Biggest Crisis in the World is Spiritual Poverty

Master Wonder · Dec 31, 2024

The world’s biggest crisis is “spiritual poverty.” While material poverty is a measurable lack, spiritual poverty is an intangible, deep crisis. It’s like an inner black hole that erodes individuals’ sense of meaning and happiness and weakens the spiritual foundation of entire societies. Why is spiritual poverty the most severe form of poverty? How does […]

世界上最大的危机就是“灵魂贫困”

Master Wonder · Dec 31, 2024

物质上的贫困是一种可以测量的缺乏,但灵魂的贫困却是一种无形的、深层次的危机。它如同一种内在的黑洞,不仅吞噬个体的意义感和幸福感,也侵蚀整个社会的精神根基。从更深层次剖析,灵魂贫困为何是最严重的贫困?它又如何深刻影响个人、社会与文化的方方面面? 一、灵魂贫困的深层本质 灵魂贫困不仅仅是情感的匮乏或意义的迷失,而是一种贯穿个体内在精神世界的整体性危机。它可以从三个更深的维度来理解: 1. 与内在自我的断裂 灵魂贫困的人常常失去与自我的联结,实际上他们的自我并未真正建立。他们的内心世界荒芜而无序,缺乏对自我的认识与理解。这种无序体现为没有明确的价值观、无法处理好情感与情绪、甚至看不到存在的意义,这种内在的分裂感让人陷入迷茫与无助。 这不仅是一种心理状态,还与社会环境密切相关。在一个成功标准单一的社会中,人们很容易忽视对自我内在的探索,从而陷入表面忙碌内在空虚的生活模式。 2. 对世界与他人的隔绝 灵魂贫困往往伴随着人与世界之间的疏离感。当一个人缺乏对周围事物的兴趣与热情时,世界在他眼中变得冷漠无味,他对他人也失去了共情与关怀能力。这种隔绝不仅让个体变得孤独,也让社会整体充满冷漠与不信任。 3. 文化根基的断层与精神资源的枯竭 从更广的视角来看,灵魂贫困还意味着一个社会的文化和精神资源正在枯竭。一个灵魂贫困的社会,往往缺乏多元的文化滋养、深刻的思想反思和对精神世界的重视。结果是,人们的内在世界越来越浅薄,社会的发展也变得越来越单一和功利化。 二、灵魂贫困的深层成因 1. 功利主义的主导 当社会的价值取向被功利主义占据时,灵魂贫困就成为一种普遍现象。现代社会将成功定义为财富的积累和地位的提升,而忽视了精神追求和人性的丰富性。这种单一的价值体系,将人引向了外在的竞争,而非内在的充实。 2. 文化的单一性与娱乐至上 灵魂的滋养需要多元的文化资源和深度的思考。然而,当文化过于单一、娱乐化时,人们便开始缺乏对复杂问题的多元解读,失去对内心世界的探索兴趣。过度依赖浅层次的快感,使人们对更深远的目标和深层的价值失去了兴趣。 3. 社会结构的过度疏离 现代社会中,家庭、社区和社会之间的联结越来越脆弱。独居生活的普及、数字化的社交取代了面对面的情感交流,导致人们缺乏真正的归属感。失去社会支持的个体,更容易陷入灵魂的孤独和无助之中。 三、灵魂贫困的深远危害 1. 个体:心理问题与存在危机 灵魂贫困直接导致心理健康问题的激增。焦虑、抑郁、自杀等现象的频繁发生,与人们无法找到生命意义密切相关。同时,灵魂贫困削弱了人们追求幸福和承担责任的能力,使他们变得消极、被动,甚至丧失了对生活的热爱。 2. 社会:冷漠与分裂的蔓延 灵魂贫困的社会往往充满冷漠与分裂。当人们的灵魂荒芜时,他们更容易变得自私和防备,社会的凝聚力和信任度因此大大降低。这种状态不仅削弱了社会的稳定性,也使解决复杂问题变得更加困难。 3. 文化:创新力的枯竭与价值观的迷失 文化的繁荣源自于灵魂的丰富,而非物质的积累。当灵魂贫困成为普遍现象时,文化的创造力和深度便会大幅下降。人们更关注即时的娱乐和浅显的消费,而忽视深刻的思想与艺术,这让文化逐渐失去了其应有的感染力和引领作用。 四、走出灵魂贫困的深层路径 1. 重塑意义:从物质到精神的转向 要解决灵魂贫困,必须首先重塑生命的意义。哲学、宗教和艺术提供了对意义的深度追问与解答。通过阅读经典、接触不同文化和实践内在的思考,人们可以逐渐找到属于自己的价值观与存在的意义。 2. 重建联结:人与人之间的深度互动 灵魂的富足离不开情感的联结。家庭、社区和社会需要重新强调共情和支持的重要性。通过更多面对面的交流与协作,个体可以从社会关系中获得温暖与力量,同时也为他人注入善意与支持。 3. 多元文化的复兴:精神资源的丰富与更新 文化的多样性是灵魂滋养的重要来源。通过促进文化间的交流与融合,人们可以拓宽视野,激发灵感,并从不同的文化传统中汲取智慧。传统哲学、宗教思考与现代艺术的结合,是重建灵魂富足的重要方式。 4. 培养“给予”的习惯:在奉献中找到幸福 给予是一种治愈灵魂贫困的力量。当我们帮助他人、贡献社会时,内在的丰盈感便会自然生发。无论是参与志愿活动,还是在日常生活中对他人多一些理解与支持,这种“给予”本身便是灵魂富足的途径。 五、灵魂贫困的最终出路 灵魂贫困不是单一的物质匮乏,而是对内在意义的迷失与自我联结的断裂。它是个人危机,也是社会与文化的深层隐患。在追求物质繁荣的同时,我们必须重新审视灵魂的意义与价值。 真正的富足,是一种内在的圆满和深刻的满足感。这不仅需要个体的努力,也需要社会为精神世界创造更好的环境:更多元的文化、更紧密的联结、更深刻的思考。只有这样,我们才能告别灵魂的贫困,迈向真正的幸福与繁荣。 正如苏格拉底所言:“未经反思的人生不值得过。”愿我们每个人都能找到灵魂的归属,活出真正的意义与价值。

read more

Related Content

The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content