Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Individual Effort And Empowering: 6 Interesting Points

Daohe · Dec 31, 2024

In many societies, the narrative of individual effort reigns supreme. We are taught from a young age that hard work and perseverance are the keys to success. While this belief in the power of personal determination can be empowering, it often comes at the cost of ignoring the broader systemic forces that shape our lives. […]

佛法修行者不僅要對眾生慈悲,更要對文明慈悲

Master Wonder · Dec 26, 2024

為文明開啟通向幸福淨土的大道 佛法的核心在於慈悲,但慈悲並不僅僅侷限於幫助個體脫離苦難,更要著眼於所有眾生的煩惱解脫與幸福。世界文明的發展與眾生的幸福密不可分,所以阿彌陀佛才發願要創造一個極樂世界,讓眾生在更好的文明世界中修行。 一個進步的文明能夠為眾生創造更加公平、自由、幸福的生活條件,長養善根與慧根,提供有利的修行環境。而一個失序的文明則可能加劇眾生的苦難,讓眾生奔波勞碌,無暇他顧,更別提修行了。 作為佛法修行者,只有超越對個體的慈悲,將目光投向整個文明,以智慧和行動推動社會進步,才能真正實現「莊嚴國土、利樂有情」的佛法理想,讓這個世界成長為極樂淨土。 這不是貪戀紅塵,而是行渡世人,讓佛法在這個過程中深入人心,屬於普賢大行。 一、對文明慈悲就是對眾生慈悲 佛陀在教導中提到,眾生之苦源於無明,而無明不僅存在於個體之中,也存在於文明的結構中。當文明以貪欲、無知和對立為基礎時,其結果必然是集體的苦難。因此,佛法修行者不僅要對個體的苦難生起悲憫之心,更要對整個文明體系的不公與無明生起慈悲之心,因為只有改變文明,才能真正改變眾生集體的處境。 對個體的慈悲是修行的起點。佛法提倡「觀一切眾生皆為父母」,修行者通過慈悲心和智慧幫助身邊的眾生減輕痛苦,例如扶危濟困、解人迷惑。但這種個體的救助並不能根本解決苦的源頭。 一些學佛之人將自己的財物用於布施寺廟,但對於社會上的壓迫和苦難關注較少,這樣做或許能換來一種虛妄的安慰感,但離真正的佛子精神相差甚遠。真正的佛子行應通過具體的行動積極改善眾生的困境,努力為驅散苦難貢獻力量。 對文明的慈悲是修行的昇華。文明是眾生集體行為的結果,也是眾生苦樂的根本場域。如果文明的規則充滿了剝削、壓迫與分裂,那麼無論個體多麼努力,都難以擺脫痛苦。因此,修行者應對文明中的無明生起覺知,積極參與社會變革,用佛法智慧塑造更慈悲、更智慧的文明體系。 二、如何對文明慈悲 要對文明慈悲,需要修行者將佛法的智慧與慈悲轉化為具體的社會實踐。以下是一些路徑: 1. 弘揚佛法,提升文明的精神高度 文明的進步離不開精神的昇華,而佛法正是提供精神指導的智慧源泉。修行者應致力於將佛法的慈悲理念與智慧傳播給更多的人,幫助他們從物質的執著中解脫出來,找到生命的內在意義。 修行者可以透過佛法課程、講座、公益活動等,為現代文明注入新的精神力量,例如透過文學、藝術、影視等文化形式,將佛法中的慈悲與智慧融入大眾文化,教育和啟發人們關注內在修養與共同福祉。 2. 推動社會公正,構建慈悲的文明制度 文明的進步不僅依賴個體覺悟,還需要制度的支持。修行者可以參與或支持推動公平、正義的社會制度,以佛法的平等觀和因果法則為指導,消除社會中的歧視與不公,為眾生創造更加和諧的生存環境。在社會中,佛法修行者可以從如下方面入手,推動更加慈悲的社會建設: 3. 實踐慈悲經濟,帶動共同富足 經濟活動是文明的重要組成部分,修行者可以透過實踐「慈悲經濟」,以商業為工具傳播佛法精神,推動社會共同富裕。這種經濟模式強調「利他先於利己」,在創造財富的同時,帶動更多眾生脫離貧困。 4. 文化中融入佛法智慧 佛法修行者並不應遠離世俗事務,而應以覺悟者的姿態介入文化,以佛法智慧推動文明進步。 三、從慈悲到淨土:文明幸福的實現 佛法的終極目標是建立一個“極樂淨土”,這不僅是個體的解脫與安寧,也是眾生的共同幸福。淨土並非遙不可及的彼岸世界,而是修行者通過慈悲與智慧努力構建的現實文明。 1. 極樂淨土的特質 極樂淨土不僅意味著沒有痛苦,更意味著慈悲與智慧的廣泛實踐,是個體與文明共同成長的結果。這樣的世界將具備以下特質: 2. 淨土建設的路徑 極樂淨土的實現需要修行者的共同努力: 結語 佛法修行者對眾生的慈悲,是對個體痛苦的關懷;而對文明的慈悲,則是對整個世界命運的真實担当。當修行者將佛法的慈悲與智慧付諸實踐,不僅幫助個體脫離苦海,更推動文明走向光明。只有當我們的文明充滿慈悲與智慧時,眾生的幸福才能真正實現,這個世界才能成長為極樂淨土。讓我們以佛法為依托,以慈悲為動力,以文明為平台,共同開啟通向幸福淨土的大道。

read more

Related Content

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content