Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

缺乏博爱与善意的社会人际:让我们逐渐掉入自闭的魔窟

Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024

在这个瞬息万变的时代,科技高速发展带来的信息爆炸让人们的视野更宽广,却也让人们看到了太多赤裸裸的不公不义之事,而筑起了防备的心墙,彼此的心灵距离愈加遥远。社会中缺乏博爱与善意的人际交往,正像一面冷漠的高墙,阻隔了彼此的温度,让我们不知不觉中掉入了自闭的魔窟。而要改变这一现状,需要我们每个人重新认识博爱与善意的价值,并身体力行,将关怀的火种重新点燃。 一、冷漠与疏离:当社会丧失温度 现代生活节奏的加快,让人们为了生存和发展疲于奔命,逐渐丧失了对他人关怀的能力和意愿,冷漠和疏离成为普遍现象。 在地铁里、在街头、在办公室,人们低头刷着手机,与身边的人似乎不存在任何关联。甚至在家庭中,成员之间也变得沉默无言,各自沉浸在屏幕中。人们害怕给别人添麻烦, 害怕三观不合的冲击,于是愈发缺乏交流,社会中缺乏共享,缺乏融合。缺乏内心的同温共感,人与人之间的交往越来越丧失温度。 公共场合中,对他人困境冷眼旁观的路人、在网络空间里泛滥的自保言论、教导他人专注自身利益的劝诫,都让人感受到一种冷酷严苛的社会风气。当人们将关心他人视为一种“风险”,将最大化自身利益视为理所当然,社会融合的温度就会逐渐消失,甚至冰冷到极处。狂躁,厌恶、反抗、害怕,哭泣与此共生。   长期生活在冷漠的环境中,个体更容易陷入孤独和无助之中。心理学研究表明,缺乏人与人之间的真实互动,会导致抑郁、焦虑等心理疾病的高发。更严重的是,这种疏离会形成恶性循环,进一步削弱社会凝聚力。发生社会突发现象。 未经他人苦,不知他人罪,何以感受他人? 二、自闭的魔窟:社会关系中的恶性循环 当博爱与善意从社会中逐渐消退与退却,每个人都可能被推向孤独的深渊,冷漠的泥沼。在这种环境中,人们的自我保护意识被强化或者是相反极端弱化,将我们故意或者有意牢牢地锁定在囚笼之中自我封闭,犹如笼中的雄狮,嘶吼、咆哮、呼喊;又犹如一条冰冻的鱼,难以呼吸或者窒息。 缺乏善意的社会容易让人陷入一种对外界的不信任中。担心被拒绝、害怕受伤、害怕付出得不到回报,这些心理让个体选择封闭自我,远离他人。久而久之,人与人之间的联系变得浅薄甚至消失,每个人都成了一座孤岛。 当善意不被理解甚至被误解时,更多的人会选择冷漠以示“自保”。这种行为导致社会信任感下降,形成一种“多管闲事会招惹麻烦”的集体心理。于是,大家对他人漠不关心,对公共事务冷眼旁观,整个社会陷入恶性循环。 自闭的魔窟不仅影响个体,还会对整个社会造成深远影响,造成社会性情感枯竭。没有情感的流动,社会就像一条干涸的河流,失去了生命的活力。无论是家庭、社区还是工作环境,人与人之间的关系都变得机械而冷淡,社会凝聚力和创造力被极大削弱。 三、博爱与善意:重新点燃社会温度的钥匙 要从冷漠与自闭中解脱,我们必须意识到博爱与善意的力量。博爱是一种无私的情怀,它超越了个人利益和社会分歧,让我们能够关心每一个生命;善意则是日常生活中的实际行动,能够为社会注入温暖与信任。博爱与善意能够超越人与人之间的一切隔阂与怀疑,当一个人用博爱的胸怀与善意的行动去对待他人,其他人也会在这个过程中受到感染,将爱与温暖传递下去。 共情共勉互相激励是善意的基础。试着站在他人的立场思考,体会他们的处境和感受。比如,当看到有人需要帮助时,与其质疑或观望,不如试着伸出援手;当遇到与自己观点不同的人时,不妨先倾听,尝试理解对方的出发点。共情能够打破人与人之间的隔阂,重建信任的桥梁。 善意并不需要惊天动地的举动,它存在于日常生活的点滴中。一个关怀的问候、一句真诚的感谢、一次及时的帮助,甚至一个温暖的微笑,都可以成为传递善意的起点。这些简单的举动,能够为身边的人带来意想不到的温暖。 博爱不仅是一种个人的选择,更是一种社会的文化氛围。通过公益活动、社区帮助服务、教育传播正确给予等方式,让更多人认识到博爱的价值,并主动参与其中。当博爱成为一种社会风气,冷漠的高墙就会逐渐瓦解,人心的冰霜才能慢慢融化,人际关系才能让人如沐春风。 四、从冷漠到温暖:我们可以做得更多 每个人都可以为这个世界注入更多的博爱与善意,从而改变社会的现状。    •  在家庭中:多关注家人内心的需求,用陪伴与沟通增进彼此的感情。    •  在社区中:参与邻里活动,关心弱势群体,为营造和谐的社区环境贡献一份力量。    •  在社会中:主动参与公益事业,为需要帮助的人提供支持,将个人的爱延伸到更广的范围。 五、结语:博爱与善意是人性的复苏 博爱和善意是人性最本真的光辉,是社会复苏的希望所在。当我们选择付出博爱,奉献善意,我们不仅是在帮助他人,也是在为自己赢得一片更温暖的天地。让我们每个人都行动起来,从点滴做起,把冷漠的高墙化为温情的桥梁,将自闭的魔窟变成博爱的乐园。唯有如此,我们才能共同构建一个充满温度与信任的社会,为自己,也为下一代,创造一个更加美好的未来。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content