Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

一乘公益對我們共同福祉的探索與研究

Yicheng · Nov 17, 2024

社會福利創造、社會福利生產、社會福利保障的區別與整體對人類發展過程的意義 社會福利是現代社會發展的核心組成部分,其涵蓋了從設計理念到具體實施以及維護的完整過程。社會福利創造、製造與保障分別承載了不同的功能和任務,而三者的協作是推動社會持續進步的關鍵。 一乘公益在探討三者區別的基礎上,更深刻地剖析它們在社會結構和發展過程中扮演的角色,有助於全面理解社會福利對人類的深遠意義。 一、社會福利的基本邏輯與價值背景 1. 社會福利的本質 社會福利是對社會資源的一種制度化分配,目標在於透過公平的資源分配、風險控制和公共服務提升社會整體福祉。 2. 現代社會對福利的需求 福利的需求是社會矛盾的體現,也是社會發展的動力。歷來矛盾一直是我們前進發展的動力。無論是工業化初期的勞資矛盾,還是全球化浪潮下的財富分配問題,社會福利體系的演化都源於對這些問題的回應和調節。 二、社會福利創造、生產與保障的深入剖析 1. 社會福利創造:價值觀與創新能力的結合 福利創造是為社會問題設計解決方案的過程,其核心在於提出符合時代需求的新制度、新方法和新理念。 問題與挑戰: 2. 社會福利生產:資源分配與制度執行的核心環節 社會福利生產是將福利創造的理念轉化為實際行動的過程,涉及資源整合、服務提供和監督執行。 問題與挑戰: 3. 社會福利保障:體系穩定與可持續性的守護者 福利保障是一種制度化的約束機制,其目的是透過法律和政策確保福利體系長期穩定運行。 問題與挑戰: 三、社會福利在整體社會結構中的作用 1. 調節經濟運行中的矛盾福利創造、製造與保障共同填補了市場經濟中未能覆蓋的部分。透過社會保障基金、公共服務和政策干預,福利體系減緩了貧富差距對經濟的破壞性影響,同時也為社會穩定提供了經濟基礎。 2. 构建社会秩序与凝聚力福利体系通过保障基本权益,维护了社会的基本秩序。尤其在贫富差距扩大、社会流动性减弱的背景下,福利保障是防止社会撕裂的重要手段。 3. 推動人類文明的发展從慈善救濟到現代福利國家,社會福利體系的演變反映了人類社會在公平、自由、尊嚴等核心價值上的不斷追求。 四、未來發展:全球化與技術革命的挑戰與機遇 1. 全球化的影響在全球化的影響下,福利體系的可持續性面臨全球化帶來的跨國競爭、移民問題和國際合作需求。例如,難民湧入會對接收國的福利體系造成壓力,但全球性的福利合作尚未成熟。我們一乘公益也將研究「社會公民福利系統」。為所有公民的福祉奉獻我們公益的力量。 2. 技術革命的雙刃劍 3. 生態文明與可持續發展社會福利的未來需要與生態文明理念結合,建立既滿足人類需求又尊重自然資源限制的綠色福利體系。 五、一乘公益在不斷為大家的福祉探索 社會福利創造、生產與保障不僅是經濟與社會發展的重要工具,更是人類文明不斷追求公平、幸福與尊嚴的體現。三者相輔相成,共同為人類社會搭建起一個安全網,同時也為未來的發展提供了無限可能。 在全球化、技術革命與生態危機的多重背景下,我們需要重新思考福利體系的內涵與外延,以確保它繼續為全人類的共同發展提供動力。一乘公益將不斷研究這個課題,使社會福利系統更加適應時代的發展,為人類帶來更加美好的未來。  

यिचेंग कॉमनवील का सामूहिक कल्याण पर अनुसंधान और अन्वेषण

Yicheng · Nov 17, 2024

यह लेख सामाजिक कल्याण निर्माण, सामाजिक कल्याण उत्पादन, और सामाजिक कल्याण आश्वासन के बीच के अंतर और मानव विकास में उनके समग्र महत्व के बारे में है। सामाजिक कल्याण आधुनिक समाज के विकास का एक मौलिक स्तंभ है, जो अवधारणा से लेकर कार्यान्वयन और रखरखाव तक की पूरी प्रक्रिया को कवर करता है। सामाजिक कल्याण […]

read more

Related Content

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content