Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

一乗公益:共同福祉への探究

Yicheng · Nov 17, 2024

社会福祉の創造、生産、保障の違いと人類発展への意義 社会福祉は、現代社会の発展における中核的な要素であり、理念の設計から具体的な実施、そしてその維持に至るまでの一連の過程を包含しています。社会福祉の創造、生産、保障はそれぞれ異なる機能と役割を担い、これら三者の連携こそが社会の持続的な進歩を推進する鍵となります。 一乗公益は、これら三者の違いを探る中で、社会構造および発展過程における各々の役割をより深く分析し、社会福祉が人類に与える意義を理解するための切口を提供することを目指しています。 一、社会福祉の基本論理と価値背景 1. 社会福祉の本質 社会福祉とは、社会資源の制度的な分配を指し、公平な資源分配、リスク管理、公共サービスを通じて社会全体の福祉を向上させることを目的としています。 2. 現代社会における福祉の需要 福祉の需要は、社会的矛盾を反映するものであり、同時に社会発展の原動力でもあります。これまで、産業化初期における労使間の対立や、グローバル化の波の中での富の再分配問題など、社会福祉システムの進化はこれらの問題への対応と調整を通じて発展してきました。 二、社会福祉の創造、生産、保障の詳細な分析 1. 社会福祉の創造:価値観と革新能力の融合 福祉の創造とは、社会問題に対する解決策を設計するプロセスであり、時代のニーズに適合する新たな制度や手法、理念を打ち出すことに核心があります。 問題と課題: 2.社会福祉生産:資源配分と制度実施の中核的プロセス 福祉生産とは、創造された福祉理念を具体的な行動に転換する過程であり、資源の統合、サービスの提供、実施の監督が含まれます。 問題と課題: 3. 社会福祉の保障:制度の安定性と持続可能性を守る 福祉保障は、法律や政策を通じて福祉システムの長期的な安定運営を確保する制度的な制約メカニズムです。 問題と課題: 三、社会福祉が社会構造全体に果たす役割 1.経済運営における矛盾の調整福祉の創造、生産、保障は、市場経済がカバーできない部分を補完します。社会保障基金や公共サービス、政策介入を通じて、福祉システムは貧富の差が経済に与える破壊的な影響を緩和し、社会の安定に経済的基盤を提供します。 2.社会秩序と結束力の構築福祉システムは基本的な権利を保障することで、社会の基本秩序を維持します。特に貧富格差の拡大や社会的流動性の低下が進む中で、福祉保障は社会の分裂を防ぐ重要な手段となっています。 3.人類文明発展の推進慈善的な救済から現代の福祉国家へと至る福祉システムの進化は、公平、自由、尊厳といった人類社会の核心的価値観への追求を反映しています。 四、未来への展望:グローバル化と技術革命がもたらす挑戦と機会 1.グローバル化の影響グローバル化の進展に伴い、福祉制度の持続可能性は、国際的な競争、移民問題、そして国際協力の必要性といった新たな課題に直面しています。例えば、難民の大量流入は受け入れ国の福祉制度に負担をかけることがありますが、福祉におけるグローバルな協力体制はまだ成熟していません。私たち一乗公益も「社会公民福祉システム」の研究を進め、すべての市民の福祉のために力を尽くしていきます。 2. 技術革新は両刃の剣 3. エコ文明と持続可能な発展福祉制度の未来は、エコ文明の理念と結びつく必要があります。人間のニーズを満たしつつ、自然資源の限界を尊重する「グリーン福祉システム」の構築が求められています。 五、一乗公益は人々のために、福祉を探求し続けている 社会福祉の創造、生産、そして保障は、単なる経済・社会の発展のためのツールにとどまりません。それは、人類が公平、幸福、そして尊厳を追求する過程そのものを象徴しています。この三者は相互に補完し合い、人類社会における安全ネットワークを構築すると同時に、未来の発展に向けた無限の可能性を提供します。 グローバル化、技術革新、そしてエコロジー危機といった多様な背景のもとで、私たちは福祉制度の本質を再考する必要があります。それにより、福祉制度が引き続き全人類の共通の発展に貢献できるようにするのです。一乗公益はこの課題を引き続き研究し、福祉システムを時代の変化に適応させることで、人類により良い未来をもたらすことを目指します。  

一乘公益对我们共同福祉的探索与研究

Yicheng · Nov 17, 2024

社会福利创造、社会福利生产、社会福利保障的区别与整体对人类发展过程的意义 社会福利是现代社会发展的核心组成部分,其涵盖了从设计理念到具体实施以及维护的完整过程。社会福利创造、生产与保障分别承载了不同的功能和任务,而三者的协作是推动社会持续进步的关键。 一乘公益在探讨三者区别的基础上,更深刻地剖析它们在社会结构和发展过程中扮演的角色,有助于全面理解社会福利对人类的深远意义。 一、社会福利的基本逻辑与价值背景 1. 社会福利的本质 社会福利是对社会资源的一种制度化分配,目标在于通过公平的资源分配、风险控制和公共服务提升社会整体福祉。 2. 现代社会对福利的需求 福利的需求是社会矛盾的体现,也是社会发展的动力。历来矛盾一直是我们前进发展的动力。 无论是工业化初期的劳资矛盾,还是全球化浪潮下的财富分配问题,社会福利体系的演化都源于对这些问题的回应和调节。 二、社会福利创造、生产与保障的深入剖析 1. 社会福利创造:价值观与创新能力的结合 福利创造是为社会问题设计解决方案的过程,其核心在于提出符合时代需求的新制度、新方法和新理念。 问题与挑战: 2. 社会福利生产:资源分配与制度执行的核心环节 社会福利生产是将福利创造的理念转化为实际行动的过程,涉及资源整合、服务提供和监督执行。 问题与挑战: 3. 社会福利保障:体系稳定与可持续性的守护者 福利保障是一种制度化的约束机制,其目的是通过法律和政策确保福利体系长期稳定运行。 问题与挑战: 三、社会福利在整体社会结构中的作用 1. 调节经济运行中的矛盾福利创造、生产与保障共同填补了市场经济中未能覆盖的部分。通过社会保障基金、公共服务和政策干预,福利体系减缓了贫富差距对经济的破坏性影响,同时也为社会稳定提供了经济基础。 2. 构建社会秩序与凝聚力福利体系通过保障基本权益,维护了社会的基本秩序。尤其在贫富差距扩大、社会流动性减弱的背景下,福利保障是防止社会撕裂的重要手段。 3. 推动人类文明的发展从慈善救济到现代福利国家,社会福利体系的演变反映了人类社会在公平、自由、尊严等核心价值上的不断追求。 四、未来发展:全球化与技术革命的挑战与机遇 1. 全球化的影响在全球化的影响下,福利体系的可持续性面临全球化带来的跨国竞争、移民问题和国际合作需求。例如,难民涌入会对接收国的福利体系造成压力,但全球性的福利合作尚未成熟。我们一乘公益也将研究“社会公民福利系统”。 为所有公民的福祉奉献我们公益的力量。 2. 技术革命的双刃剑 3. 生态文明与可持续发展社会福利的未来需要与生态文明理念结合,建立既满足人类需求又尊重自然资源限制的绿色福利体系。 五、一乘公益在不断为大家的福祉探索 社会福利创造、生产与保障不仅是经济与社会发展的重要工具,更是人类文明不断追求公平、幸福与尊严的体现。三者相辅相成,共同为人类社会搭建起一个安全网,同时也为未来的发展提供了无限可能。 在全球化、技术革命与生态危机的多重背景下,我们需要重新思考福利体系的内涵与外延,以确保它继续为全人类的共同发展提供动力。一乘公益将不断研究这个课题,让社会福利系统更加适应时代的发展,为人类带来更加美好的未来。

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content