Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

尊重他人的梦想,是爱的最高境界

Kishou · Oct 26, 2024

不要嘲笑别人的梦想,哪怕你是英雄 今天偶然机会看到,伊隆•马斯克的采访。 有感而生写了这篇短文。 梦想,是每个人心灵深处最真挚的渴望,是对未来的期许和对自我价值的探索。然而,很多梦想被认为是不切实际,甚至被嘲笑。即便是人们心中的“英雄”,也不应以成就的高低去衡量他人的梦想。如果一个人的内心有对他人充足的爱,就会全心全意地尊重与爱护他人的梦想,为他们的选择与追求感到由衷的高兴。这是对他人梦想的支持,也是对自身品德的要求,更是一种对最高境界的爱的诠释。 每一个梦想都值得尊重 梦想的价值,不在于它看起来有多么伟大,而在于它源于内心的真实渴望。对有些人而言,梦想可能是追求事业,走上人生巅峰,让众人钦佩;对另一些人而言,梦想也许只是开一家小店,追求生活中简单平凡的幸福。无论是怎样的梦想,都是个人对人生意义的一种追求,代表着个人独特的生命价值。 当英雄们站在成功的巅峰时,他们也许会忘记自己曾经也是一个普通的追梦人,也经历过质疑和不理解。然而,每一个梦想都有其存在的价值,不在于外界如何评价。无论一个人取得了多大的成就,也无论他在人们眼中多么伟大,都不应该轻视他人的梦想。真正的尊重来源于自己的品质,也来源于对梦想背后付出的努力和执着的理解。 英雄的宽容,源于对多样性的理解 每个人的梦想都独一无二,嘲笑他人的梦想其实是在否定个体的多样性。英雄之所以被人们称为“英雄”,不仅仅因为他们的成就,更因为他们具有宽广的胸怀和接纳多样性的能力。尊重他人的梦想,就是对人生多样性的欣赏,是对他人生活选择的理解和支持。 在现实中,不乏那些一开始被认为“不切实际”的梦想最终带来巨大改变的例子。科学家爱因斯坦的相对论曾被质疑,艺术家梵高的画作在他生前未被赏识,但这些梦想最终改变了世界。英雄的伟大不仅体现在他们自身的成就,还体现在他们是否愿意成为他人梦想的支持者。 真正的爱,是对梦想的尊重和支持 当我们足够爱一个人时,我们会去理解和支持他们的梦想,并为他们的追求感到高兴。尊重梦想的选择,是对爱的一种升华,是一种真正的爱。正如电影导演李安和他的妻子。年轻时的李安为了追求电影导演的事业,很长一段时间都没有工作,在家写剧本、带孩子,而他的妻子一直无怨无悔地支持他,帮助他成就后来的事业。对于李安来说,他的妻子是真正爱他、支持他的存在,而他也非常感激这种饱含尊重的爱。 当然,爱的本质,不在于我们是否能为他人实现梦想提供多大的帮助,而在于我们是否能尊重他们的选择,愿意鼓励他们继续前行。很多人之所以是别人心目中的英雄,在于他们并不只是活在自己的荣誉之中,而是能够给予他人力量,让缺乏梦想的人看到梦想的价值,有梦想的人看到希望与未来。 为他人的梦想而高兴,是人性光辉的展现 真正的英雄并不以自己的成就为骄傲,而是愿意分享他人追梦过程中的喜悦。当我们尊重并庆祝他人的梦想时,我们不仅是在支持他们实现个人的目标,也是在见证人类共同追求幸福和意义的过程。这种为他人梦想而高兴的态度,其实是人性的一种宽容和博爱。有了这样的爱,社会才能变得更加包容,让所有人都有幸福的空间。 印度电影《摔跤吧!爸爸》改编自真人真事,电影中的父亲在一个歧视女性的环境中,选择尊重和支持女儿的摔跤梦想,成就了她的冠军之路。正如爸爸对女儿所说,“你不是在为你一个人战斗,而是为了千千万万的女性,让她们看到,女人不是只有相夫教子这条路“。支持一个人的梦想,有时候正是在支持社会的进步与文化的升华。 尊重他人的梦想,是人性道德日臻完善的表现,也是爱的最高境界。每一个善意的梦想都值得被尊重和珍惜,因为它们承载着追梦人的渴望和不懈努力。当我们学会真正爱世界爱他人时,就会尊重大家的梦想选择,并为他们的梦想而高兴。这种道德上人性上的态度不仅让世界更加美好,也让我们自己变得心胸宽广,充满爱心。

靈修:信仰之門的初啟與靈魂探索的起點

Master Wonder · Oct 26, 2024

靈修,是所有信仰的最初印記,也是我們邁向精神覺醒的第一步。在世俗生活的喧囂中,靈修像是一股清澈的泉水,濯洗著內心的塵埃,喚醒了我們對自我和生命的深刻感知。它是我們從物質世界的束縛中抽身而出,進入靈魂深處的契機。通過靈修,我們開始脫離那些表面的、機械化的生活方式,開始追問:我們的存在究竟意味著什麼?生命的本質又是什麼? 在這個過程中,靈修不僅是一次精神的洗禮,也是第一次有機會回到生命的本源,審視那個最真實的自我。它打破了我們對日常生活的慣性思維,迫使我們質疑那些被認為理所當然的信念和行為模式。這種內心的反思,不僅是對自我意識的覺醒,更是對整個存在狀態的重新定義。通過靈修,我們開始看到生命不僅僅是肉體的運作或社會角色的扮演,而是包含著更深層次的靈魂使命和精神追求。 靈修不僅提供了通往信仰的鑰匙,還為我們揭開了生命背後的隱秘結構。它是一種內在的「煉金術」,通過不斷地自我淨化和心靈修煉,使我們超越物質的限制,達到一種更高的存在狀態。在這個過程中,痛苦、迷茫和挫折常常是不可避免的。靈修不是輕鬆的路徑,而是一場對自我的深刻挑戰和蛻變。它讓我們面對內心的陰影和不安,使我們學會與自我對話,與恐懼共處,並在不斷的磨礪中逐漸靠近生命的真諦。 靈修的真正價值,不僅在於改變我們對外在世界的看法,更在於引導我們進入靈魂的深層次領域,觸及那些被日常意識所遮蔽的靈性智慧。通過靈修,我們學會在內心的寂靜中傾聽,感受到一種無形但卻真實的力量在我們生命中流動。這種力量,是所有信仰的核心本質,它讓我們不再僅僅依賴外在的教條和儀式,而是親身體驗到信仰背後的神秘聯結。 靈修不僅是所有信仰的啟蒙,也是一種超越信仰形式的精神實踐。它引導我們進入一個沒有邊界的精神領域,在那裡,所有信仰的表象都被抽象成一種純粹的存在狀態。這是一個需要不斷深入和探索的旅程,因為靈修從不止步於簡單的自我完善,而是鼓勵我們去觸及更深的本體性問題:我是誰?我從哪裡來?我向何處去?這些問題在靈修的過程中不斷被揭示和重新定義,使我們的人生觀和世界觀逐漸趨向一種更為整體的視角。 因此,靈修不僅是一個開始,也是一種持續的覺知狀態。它為我們提供了一種理解生命的全新方式,讓我們能在紛繁複雜的現實中保持內心的寧靜與專注。透過靈修,我們學會了如何不被外在的喧囂所迷惑,如何在內心建立一種不可動搖的信仰力量。它是一種內在的指南針,指引我們在靈性旅程中找到正確的方向,並不斷向靈魂的最深處進發。

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content