Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

素质教育中,每个孩子都是A

Daohe · Oct 27, 2024

素质教育的兴起是教育界的重大变革,也是公民社会进步的重要标志之一。在素质教育的理念中,每个孩子都是A,这不仅仅是对他们成绩的认可,更是对他们成长过程的全面肯定。传统教育中,学生的表现通常按照“优良差”或“A、B、C”这些等级来划分,这种分层评估方式实质上是阶级社会的产物,注重对固定标准的遵循。然而,素质教育突破了这一传统,将孩子们的学习和成长视为一个多维度、无限发展的过程,倡导通过尊重个体差异,赋予每个孩子平等的地位和机会,让他们不断地拓展自己的能力与素质。 每个孩子都是A 素质教育的核心理念是每个孩子都是A,这意味着每个孩子发展潜力平等,机会平等。教育不再根据分数来为孩子贴上“优劣”的标签,而是将重点放在激发孩子的多元潜能和个性发展上。每个孩子在学习的过程中有自己独特的节奏和步伐,进步不应通过单一的成绩来衡量,而是通过他们对学习的积极态度、探索精神、综合成绩以及在多种领域中的表现来肯定。这种方式让教育更加多元化和包容性,让每一个孩子都能在不同的领域中找到属于自己的闪光点。 A后面的+号 在素质教育的框架下,A后面的“+”号不仅象征着学生在学术上的进步,还代表他们在学习过程中表现出的额外努力、积极态度和个人成长,每一个“+”都是他们在不同领域所取得进步的标志。例如,有的孩子可能在学术上表现不如其他人出色,但在艺术、体育或社会活动中却展现了独特的才能。无论孩子的“+”多或少,教育的任务就是为他们创造一个多样化的成长环境,让每个孩子都能通过自己的方式,积累属于自己的A+。 无限A+ 素质教育主张“无限A+”的理念,这意味着孩子们的学习和成长没有固定的终点,他们可以不断挑战自我,追求更高的成就。这种评价体系打破了传统的分数限制,强调学习的持续性和个体的无限潜能。无限A+不仅是对孩子们成绩的认可,更是对他们成长过程的信心和期许。它鼓励学生不断追求卓越,不论是在学术上、技能上,还是在个人素养和社会责任感上,都能获得持续的提升。这种教育方式促使孩子们在面对未来的挑战时,充满信心和动力,具备多元化的适应能力。 人人都是A 在素质教育的价值观中,人人都是A,这不仅是对孩子们学习成果的认可,更是一种社会平等的体现。素质教育认为,教育的根本目的不是将孩子们分出优劣,而是通过给予平等的教育资源和发展机会,激发出每个孩子的潜能和价值。无论孩子的天赋和兴趣领域是什么,教育都应该提供一个支持包容的环境,让他们能够在自己擅长的领域取得成就,同时激励他们尝试新事物,探索不同的可能性。“人人都是A”的理念将会消除教育中的标签化现象,强调尊重个体差异和接纳多样性。 传统教育与素质教育的对比 传统的教育评价体系倾向于根据固定的标准对学生进行排名和区分,这种做法可能导致一些孩子因为成绩不理想而产生自卑感,影响学习兴趣。而素质教育则倡导以多维度的评估体系来看待孩子们的成长,不仅仅关注学习成绩,还重视孩子在学习过程中的探索精神、问题解决能力、团队协作和创造力等方面的表现。这种差异化的评价方式鼓励孩子们关注自己的成长过程,而不是与他人比较成绩的高低。 通过多维度的评估方式,素质教育为孩子们提供了个性化的支持,帮助他们在擅长的领域取得更大的成就,同时也激发他们探索新的学习领域,培养面对复杂问题的适应能力。这种方式不仅帮助孩子们树立自信心,还能培养他们的独立思考能力和终身学习的习惯。 素质教育:通向公民社会的桥梁 素质教育中“每个孩子都是A”的理念,不仅是教育领域的革新,更是推动社会平等的重要一步。它符合普遍人权的原则,让每个孩子在教育中都享有平等的机会和发展权利。这种教育方式消除了成绩的单一化追求,打破了对“失败”的标签化认定,有助于减少社会阶层的分化,让所有孩子在教育中获得公正的待遇和成长机会。 素质教育培养的不仅是有知识和技能的个体,还着力于塑造具有责任感、社会关怀和全球视野的未来公民。通过这种教育方式,孩子们从小就树立起正确的公民意识,认识到自己和他人的平等价值,学会尊重差异、包容多样性。这些素质不仅能使他们在未来社会中胜任各种角色,也为建设一个更公平、更民主的公民社会奠定了基础。 结语 素质教育倡导“每个孩子都是A”的理念,是对教育方式的革新和对公民平等的尊重。A后面的“+”号象征着孩子们无限的成长潜力和不断的进步;“无限A+”则激励他们在成长过程中追求卓越、勇于探索。通过多维度的评估和差异化的培养方式,素质教育为每个孩子提供了平等的发展机会,使他们能够在多样化的学习环境中展示自己的价值和潜能。这种教育方式不仅能塑造出更具适应力和创造力的个体,还能推动社会向更公平、更民主的方向发展,为实现公民社会的理想打下坚实的基础。

Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love

Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love

Kishou · Oct 26, 2024

Do not laugh at other people’s dreams, even if you are a hero. Today, I happened to watch an interview with Elon Musk, which inspired me to write this article. Dreams are the deepest and most genuine desires of the human spirit, reflecting our hopes for the future and our search for purpose. However, many […]

read more

Related Content

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content