Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

少女(Greta Thunberg)我们的未来啊

少女(Greta Thunberg)我们的未来啊

Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025

我们常说:“孩子是我们的未来。”这句话几乎成为全世界父母、教育者、领袖挂在嘴边的金句。然而,在今天这个情感极化、信息混乱、立场先行、暴力泛滥的时代,这句口号已经不再足够,它需要重新被认真地检视,被沉静地质问——孩子究竟会成为怎样的未来? 我们允许孩子任性,因为成长的本质就是从无知到知晓、从冲动到成熟、从盲目到清明。任性是生命在学习面对现实、理解秩序、认知复杂世界过程中的必然产物。一个社会若不能容纳孩子的任性,便是对活力和创造力的压制。 但问题在于,当孩子不再只是任性,而是在无知、偏执、被裹挟之下,主动向恶意、向仇恨、向暴力、向极端学习,甚至成为它们的工具和代言人时,这种任性就不再是青春的火花,而是未来灾难的前兆。 一个时代的悲哀:当“正义”沦为仇恨的外衣 2025年6月9日,国际新闻上一则让人心寒的消息:22岁的瑞典环保少女格蕾塔·通贝里(Greta Thunberg),在驶向加沙的救援船“玛德琳号”上,遭以色列军方强行登船扣押。她头戴巴勒斯坦头巾,成为政治暴力行动的一部分。 这条消息的表象是以巴冲突,又是人道援助行动,但真正引发争议的是格蕾塔本人的身份与所代表的舆论效应。 格蕾塔,曾经是环保、和平、青春正义的象征,一个敢于在联合国讲坛上怒斥全球领袖失责、激励全球青少年关注气候危机的女孩,却在政治极端化浪潮裹挟下,逐渐从环保代言人,滑向某些极端主义团体的舆论工具,公开为暴力站台、为仇恨背书。 这是本世纪舆论操控的经典范例:将青少年的愤怒与善意,包装成正义,将复杂残酷的政治博弈,简化成黑白对立、情绪宣泄,将原本属于良知的社会责任,偷换成群体狂热、立场偏执。 格蕾塔的危险,不是她的环保立场,也不是她的人道主义情怀,而是她所象征的那一代年轻人,正快速在社交媒体、网络舆论、政治极端化中失去判断,失去理性,失去对真实复杂世界的认知,沦为仇恨传播者、情绪制造者、暴力合法化的工具。 我们不能再纵容孩子在仇恨中成长 我们可以原谅孩子在成长中对权威的不满、对现实的愤怒、对不公的质疑。 我们可以接受他们因年少无知而情绪化、冲动、偏激。 但我们不能容忍、也绝不能纵容他们主动投身仇恨,迷恋暴力,崇拜极端,把偏执当理想,把破坏当正义。 世界每一场灾难、每一次社会崩溃、每一场暴力运动的背后,都有一群被极端思想诱导、被偏执情绪点燃、被仇恨绑架的年轻人。 他们本可以是建设者,却被操控成了破坏者;本可以是希望,却成了噩梦。 格蕾塔事件,正是当代社会价值观失守、教育失衡、媒体操纵舆论、社交网络情绪狂热化的典型缩影。 一个原本拥有正义感与善意的年轻人,如何在全球舆论裹挟中,逐渐失去独立判断,滑向极端阵营,为政治暴力提供合法性?这不仅是她个人的悲剧,更是我们这个时代的病症。 谁来守护孩子,谁来守护未来? 孩子是我们的未来。 但未来从不是自动美好的,它必须被教化、被守护、被理性与善良引导。 我们责无旁贷。 社会要教会孩子: 父母、教育者、媒体、国家制度,甚至每一个成年人,都必须承担起这个责任。 在无序喧嚣的时代,理性与良知是最昂贵、却最稀缺的资源。 如果我们放任年轻人在仇恨、偏执、暴力、极端政治狂热中成长,未来将不属于建设者、守护者,而属于煽动者、破坏者。 而这样的未来,是任何文明都无法承受。 最后的话 我们今天看到的是格蕾塔(Greta),但世界各国,都有无数被极端思潮渗透、被网络舆论操控、被虚假正义蛊惑的年轻人。 如果我们再不警醒,再不去教育、去守护、去劝诫,再不去反思价值观的失守、社会舆论的极化、教育的失衡,再过二十年,恐怕这个世界将遍地仇恨、暴力合法、极端泛滥,再无净土。 孩子是我们的未来。 但未来究竟是光明,还是深渊,取决于今天我们为他们种下了什么。 善良可以任性,正义不能沦为仇恨的工具。 成长必须允许迷茫,但社会不能放弃劝诫和引导。 我们不能再失守。 未来是他们,守护未来,是我们的责任。

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization

Kishou · Jun 11, 2025

This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.

read more

Related Content

The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
View All Content