Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

Master Wonder · Jun 12, 2025

在这方世界,最响亮的声音,不是赞美,不是祈愿,不是劝诫,而是嘲笑。 那是一种如影随形、昼夜不息的“潮信”。它不像潮水轰然涌来,而是如窸窣细语般,渗透在每个角落,流淌在每个人心底。它以千百种面孔出现,却只有一个本质——对未知的恐惧,对不属于自身范畴的一切,发自本能的拒斥与戏谑。 麻木者嘲笑觉者。因为觉醒之人,扰乱了麻木之人的幻梦。 当年屈原执笔《离骚》,劝谏楚王,反被群臣讥为“疯癫之徒”;鲁迅弃医从文,揭世疾时,被讽刺“尖刻、偏激、唱衰”;今天,凡是敢指出社会病灶、追问制度深因的人,总被骂作“愤青”“键盘侠”“没事找事”。 世人宁可蜷缩在熟悉的困顿里,享受短暂温饱与虚妄安全,也不愿直视真实破败。于是,当有人指向黑暗,他们便说他疯了;当有人高举火炬,他们便讥他妄想拯救世界。 胆小者嘲笑勇敢。因为勇敢者揭示了他们的不堪。 你看,电影《肖申克的救赎》里,安迪在监狱屋顶争取一瓶啤酒,被讥笑“装英雄”;现实里,每一个站出来为正义发声的人,微博评论区、论坛热帖,少不了“多管闲事”“自寻麻烦”“人家都不管你激动啥”。 世上多少人,口口声声“顺势而为”“保命要紧”,却在暗夜里悄悄羡慕那些敢逆水行舟的人。为了掩饰自己的怯懦,他们嘲弄前行者“徒劳”“自不量力”,把别人失败的可能,当作自己苟活下去的遮羞布。 伪善者嘲笑正义。因为正义之人照出了伪善者的丑陋。 网络上但凡有人为底层疾苦发声,立刻有人跳出来:“别装圣母”“你行你上”。他们常常披着道德外衣,行着自利之事,口口声声“天下苍生”“众生平等”,可真正面对是非之际,转身就与权力、利益同流。 为了避免被正义之光照破,他们宁愿先下手为强,将持守原则的人描绘成极端、偏执、伪君子。 无知者嘲笑学识。因为知识让他们感到自卑。 “你读那么多书有用吗?”“做学问能当饭吃?”“讲道理谁不会?”这些话,常常在饭桌聚会、同事闲聊、短视频评论里听见。 在无知者眼里,复杂思考、不合群见解、对世界规律的探究,都是多余、无用、虚妄。 那些劝人“别太认真,大家都混口饭吃就行了”的,最怕的就是有人真的去较真,真的去思考,真的看清了规则。 苟且者嘲笑光明。因为光明昭示了他们所处的黑暗。 在《辛德勒的名单》里,辛德勒冒险救犹太人时,身边商人讥他“多管闲事”;现实生活中,那些去山区支教、助农直播、救助流浪狗的人,总有人冷笑:“炒作”“作秀”“图热度”。 苟且者不敢承认这个世界可以更好,不愿相信人性有另一种可能,不肯放弃眼前一口残羹冷炙。 他们说:“你太天真了”,仿佛世间唯一成熟,就是随波逐流、见利忘义、认命躺平。 退步者嘲笑正进。因为前行的人,无声地在提醒他们停滞不前。 很多企业里,谁要是主动加班钻研、提出优化方案,总被同事嘲笑“爱表现”“拍马屁”;学术圈里,认真做研究的人,被同行讥“死读书”“不通世务”;就连街头健身、晨跑的人,也会有人挤兑:“这年头还折腾啥”。 一个社会最容易发生的,就是让所有人一起缓慢沉沦,然后将反抗者定性为“异端”。凡是敢于改善的人,便被斥为不安分,凡是渴望改变的人,便成了无事生非。 甚至,贫穷者也嘲笑富裕。 不是因为贫穷多么可敬,而是因为他们不愿承认自己命运里那部分由自身选择决定。于是,凡是富裕者,便被冠以“不义”“走捷径”“靠关系”的标签。“有钱的都没好人”“他那钱怎么来的你不知道?”仿佛一句偏见就能抵消自己所有不作为。 贫穷便成为一种“清高”的勋章,而富裕则沦为一种“可疑”的罪证。 于是,这方世界,昼夜涨落着这种名为“嘲笑”的潮信。它悄无声息地围困每一个灵魂,将人们的棱角磨平,将异类与独行者赶出人群,将光明者逐入黑暗,将敢于反问的人钉上耻辱柱。 而那真正值得警惕的,从来不是嘲笑本身,而是嘲笑背后所藏的那股恐惧——对未知的恐惧,对改变的恐惧,对失去自我幻觉的恐惧。 在这片潮信里,若你想守住自己的火光,便要学会与风浪共眠,与孤独相伴,与讥讽同行。 因为世上的真正强者,从不在乎浪花,而只看向彼岸。

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

read more

Related Content

A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
View All Content