Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「利民」と「利国」の違い──現代国家統治の正道と秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家の存在理由は、スローガンでも領土でも GDP でもない。 国民の基本的権利を保障し、生活の尊厳を守り、幸福度を高めること――これだけが国家の存在意義である。 もし国家が強大でも国民が困窮し、国の栄光が語られても国民が不安に苛まれているのなら、その国家はうわべだけの空洞だ。見た目は繁栄していても、内部には問題が山積している。 したがって、「利国」と「利民」の本質的な違いを明確にし、「利民」を国家統治の唯一の正当性の根拠として確立することこそが、現代国家の安定・公正・持続的繁栄の前提となる。 Ⅰ. 「利国」と「利民」の矛盾とは何か 利国:国家規模の戦略、安全保障、経済成長、軍事的地位、国際的影響力など、システム全体の目標 利民:国民一人ひとりの収入、雇用保障、住宅・医療、言論の自由、司法の公正、公共福祉、人格の尊厳、政治参加の権利 本来であれば両者は一致すべきだが、権力運用と国家意思の実行過程で次のような構造的矛盾が生じやすい: これら構造的矛盾こそが「利国」優先政策の最大の弊害であり、国民にとっての真の敵である。 Ⅱ. 「利国」中心政策が孕む七つのリスク 表面的な国威や外交上の強硬姿勢を保つために、国民の権利を犠牲にする国家も存在する。こうした選択は、やがて七つの重大なリスクの種を撒くことになる: 1.社会的信頼の崩壊 国民が政府・制度・司法を信頼できず、行政命令が形骸化する。 2.貧富の極端な格差 国家戦略を名目に資源を独占した資本集団に富が集中し、貧困層はさらに貧しくなる。 3. 政治的正当性の危機 国家の公信力が失われ、制度への帰属意識が崩壊し、正当性の源泉が枯渇する。 4.社会不安の蔓延 住宅・雇用・教育・老後・医療のコストが高騰し、国民の心理的バランスが崩れる。 5.公共政策の硬直化 少数の特権層が政策を握り、修正メカニズムが働かず、矛盾が雪だるま式に増大する。 6.言論統制の逆効果 メディア抑制が国民の鬱憤を蓄積させ、「表面は静穏、地下では激流」という状況を生む。 7.長期的競争力の損失 イノベーションや文化創造力が枯渇し、国家は徐々に国際競争力を失う。 Ⅲ. 利民型国家の統治中核原則 真に現代的な国家統治には、国民本位の四大原則を確立しなければならない: 1. 民生優先の原則 財政はまず医療・教育・住宅・雇用・年金など、国民の基本的生活水準を保障することを最優先とする。 2. 権利保障の原則 憲法により、知る権利・表現の自由・政治参加権・監視権を明確に保障する。 3. 公共財政の透明原則 予算編成から執行、行政情報まで全面公開し、納税者が全過程を監督できる仕組みを整える。 4. 権力限定の原則 国家権力は法律によって厳格に拘束され、公権力は公共利益のためだけに行使される。私物化・道具化・世襲化を許さない。 Ⅳ. 合理的国家統治構造の全体図 「三元共治・双方制衡」の構造を確立する: 権力主体 機能定位 監督関係 国家政府 国家安全、財政調整、立法、外交 国民・メディア・議会による監督 市民社会 […]

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content