Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

利民与利国之别:现代国家治理正道与秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家为何存在?不是为了口号、不是为了疆域、也不是为了GDP。 国家的存在意义,只在于保障公民基本权利、维护公民生活尊严、提升公民幸福指数。 若国家强大却百姓困苦,国家荣耀却公民焦虑,则这个国家必是空壳政体,强表弱里,表面繁荣,实则积弊丛生。 所以,厘清“利国”与“利民”的本质区别,并将“利民”确立为国家治理的唯一正当性,是现代国家稳定、公正、持久繁荣的前提。 一、利国与利民之间的矛盾是什么? 利国是指国家宏观战略、国家安全、经济增长、军事地位、国际影响力等系统性目标。 利民是指个体公民的收入水平、就业保障、住房医疗、言论自由、司法公正、公共福利、人格尊严、参与政治的权利。 二者本应统一,但在权力运作与国家意志实践过程中,常常出现以下结构性矛盾: 这些结构性矛盾是利国性政策最大的弊端,也是公民真正的敌人。 二、利国政策的风险有哪些? 有一些国家为保表面上的国家面子、外交强势,而选择去牺牲公民权利,久而久之,必然埋下七重风险,结果也一目了然: 1.社会信任体系崩塌 公民对政府、制度、执法、司法缺乏信任,政令失效。 2.贫富极化 资本集团借国家战略之名操控资源,财富向少数人聚集,贫者愈贫。 3. 政治合法性危机 国家公信力丧失,制度认同感坍塌,合法性来源逐渐流失。 4.社会焦虑蔓延 住房、就业、教育、养老、医疗成本高企,民众心理失衡。 5.公共政策僵化 少数权贵把持决策,政策缺乏修正机制,社会矛盾层层堆积。 6.舆论管控反噬 舆论压制导致民间怨气积聚,形成“表面稳定、暗潮涌动”格局。 7.长远国家竞争力受损 创新力、社会活力、文化创造力枯竭,国家逐渐丧失竞争优势。 三、利民型国家的治政核心原则 真正现代国家治理,必须确立四大利民治政原则: 1. 民生优先原则 财政优先保障民众基本生活质量,医疗、教育、住房、就业、养老。 2. 权利保障原则 宪法保障公民知情权、表达权、参与权、监督权。 3. 公共财政阳光原则 预算、支出、政务信息公开透明,纳税人有权全程监督。 4. 权力有限原则 国家权力受法律约束,公权力仅为公共利益服务,不能私有化、工具化、家长继承化。 四、合理国家治理结构体系图谱 构建合理国家治理体系,需确立“三元共治、双向制衡”结构: 权力主体 职能定位 监督关系 国家政府 宏观安全、财政调控、立法、外交 受公民、媒体、议会监督 公民社会 行业治理、社群事务、民间组织 受法治约束,拥有公共决策参与权 公民个人 政策投票、监督权、知情权 直接监督国家权力、参与事务治理 五、现代公务员制度彻底革新标准 国家公务员,应具备以下标准: […]

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization

Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025

I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content