Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

教你观想:回归清净无垢的本源之相

Master Wonder · Apr 23, 2025

观想是很多修行人的日常功课,它通过专注于某个具体的形象或符号,帮助修行者净化心念,提升意识的层次。通过反复观想,修行者不仅在心中构建出一个具象的形象,更通过这个形象去感悟深层的法界真理。 这个形象,本文称之为”法界原身“,不是某一种肉体形态的投影,而是超越时间、超越生灭的本来面目,是每一位修行者于无始劫以来所具的清净法身。 当我们观想皈依、修习净观、入定自省,其实是在逐步洗净尘垢,回归真实之我。 然而,许多行者在观想中却忽略了一个极其关键的问题:我们所观所念,正在无意中塑造自身的未来形相与能量之态。 一、观想的常见误区:老者观 很多人在修行中会观想皈依的圣者、导师或祖师形象,往往习惯性地将他们设定为慈祥庄重、白发苍苍的长者模样。表面上看,这是出于尊敬与对智慧之年的联想;但实际上,这种“老态”观想模式,会无形中在心识深处投下时间、老朽、衰竭的种子。 心生则法生,心灭则法灭。 观想中所建立的世界,本质上正在塑造我们的“未来身”,特别是在修习密观与坛城相应的行者中尤为重要。 若心常摄取“年老圣相”,那你未来修成的道身、法身,自会朝着这种形态成就。于是便出现了令人啼笑皆非的情况:弟子观想中的自己,比祖师爷还要年迈。 这种形态上的错乱,反映的不是修行进步,而是心识未清,法念未正,观想未圆。 二、正确的观想之道:保持心态年轻 在修行的观想中,我们不妨设定一个年轻、清净、庄严而充满智慧之相。这是对“法界原身”的一种主动呼应—— 年轻,不是对肉体年龄的执著,而是一种永恒的生命力与初心状态。 观想中年轻的自己,不是戏剧化的幻想,而是归于“本初”状态的自性真实。 在法界所见,一些修行者的“心身形貌”,竟比他们所顶礼的古佛还要显得沧桑迟暮。这并非耻辱,而是一种修观错位的显现。 因为你的心识在长年累月中,已经把“苦修、老态、沉重”作为了道的象征,而非“光明、清净、觉照”。 佛陀成道时三十二相圆满,相貌如八尺金身庄严,岂有苍老? 观音现身常为童子、妙龄、青年女相,皆寓意其智慧圆融,能摄万缘。 这不是偶然,而是法性智慧对观想之力的慈悲妙用。 三、法界无年:回归清净本初,证得本来之我 真正的“法界原身”,是无年之身、无垢之身。 它不老不死,不少不多,既非童年,也非老年,而是一种恒常青春的智慧相。 当我们在观想时让自己清净而年轻,实则是在归还自己那一份未被尘世揉皱的光明种子。 如此观想,心中所现非贪非欲,非执相之艳,而是通向更高维度的: 结语:愿诸修行者,早证法身,自现原身 希望所有修行人,在静坐、念咒、观想、礼拜之时,常忆“我是谁”,常照“我当成就何种法身“。 不要让世间的时光束缚了你内在的法界本源,不要让错乱的观想制造出你未来的苍老疲惫之身。 愿诸君: 观自身如清净童子,法身无染。 见皈依者如妙龄大士,慈光灿然。 念念回归初心,步步印证道身。 法界原身,本自不老,本自无垢。 但愿人人观想圆满,修行自在,归于真实之我。 ——谨以此文,献予每一位正行于道上的人。 扩展引导:如何正确进入“法界原身”观修法门

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
View All Content