Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

修行之人:大觉者必然是大世者

Master Wonder · Apr 15, 2025

提要:短文一篇,适合信仰修行者。 “修行”二字,往往被误解为远离尘世、闭目清修,仿佛只有在山林古刹之中才有“道”的回音。然而,真正的修行,从来不是逃避世界,而是透过世界,识破世界,超越世界。而能大觉者,必先为大世者。 大世者,乃体验世界、悟解世界之人。 他不逃避苦难,不回避复杂,也不拒绝人情世故;他入世深广,心眼敞开,在生老病死、荣辱沉浮、情爱利害中亲历体验,不以一己喜恶躲避真实。 他愿意活过整个“人”的全部过程,穿越欲望、恐惧、迷惑、失落与狂喜。他深入五浊恶世,不为浊所染,而是在其中锻炼出一颗不动之心。 没有深入世界的人,无法真正觉知人生的虚妄与实相;没有体验人性的幽微与苦痛,亦难窥见“空性”的深远。 许多修行人误以为断绝尘缘即可得道,殊不知闭门清净之中易生幻觉——以为自己已远离烦恼,实则烦恼只是暂时未被触动。 唯有大世之人,才可能真切而深刻地通达众生苦乐、生命本质,从而升起大悲、大智、大愿。 释迦牟尼曾贵为太子,却不恋王宫富贵,而是踏入人世之苦,亲历病患、死亡、衰老之无常,由“观苦”而觉悟四谛,成就无上正觉。 他未尝舍世而成佛,乃由深观此世而得“出世”。 耶稣亦非天上之神祇,高高在上地俯视世人,而是以血肉之躯行于尘世,与罪人同行,与贫者共处,经历人间之背叛与十字架之苦,才化身为神圣之道。 大道从来不在庙堂深处,而在人间烟火中。 大觉者,必然是大世者。 因为只有真正见过黑暗,才知道光的方向;只有体验过深沉之痛,才会长出悲悯之心;只有彻底融入世界,才能彻底超越世界。 修行不是修一个“我”远离世界,而是修一个“我”能承载整个世界,并在承载之中,看破它的虚妄,识得它的真相。 故修行者不可浅尝即止,不可避世求安,而要有大心量、大气魄,敢于与世界同呼吸共苦乐。 不是为了沉迷世间,而是为了悟透世间;不是为满足我执,而是为了超越我执;不是为了成为某种“成功修行者”的形象,而是为了脱去一切形象,直面真实的生命流动。 一切成道之人,必是深度活过的人;一切大觉之人,必是大世之人。 他们不拒世界,也不依赖世界。 他们活得比谁都深、都真,然后从尘土中站起,以真实的觉知与清醒回望世界。 如莲花出于淤泥,芬芳不染;如慧灯照见世相,明心而不迷心。 一乘公益奉献此文。

被名声推倒的“大和尚”

Master Wonder · Apr 11, 2025

本文基于个人的见闻,适合修行者阅读。 佛门古刹丛林中,时常可见一些所谓“大和尚”被名声所推拥而上,居于高位。然细观其行,修证尚浅,功夫未成,不过因世人敬仰、名声骤起,遂为虚荣心所挟,过早披上高僧之袈裟。 未得而自谓得,未悟而强说悟,其道心已在不觉间迷失于浮誉之中。 一念沉迷,如飞蛾扑火,初心虽存,却渐为名利所蚀,不能自拔。 久而久之,修行寸步难进,实令人惋叹。 一、误入名利之网 佛门有言:“名闻利养,修行之大贼也。”虚名最易招惹贪著之心,亦最能令道行之人起傲慢、落魔境。如古德所警:“很多修行人到后来着魔,正因名气一大,利养一多,贪心与傲慢随之而起。”名声如蜜,初尝甘甜,久则生黏,使人沉醉其中,不能自省。 未有实证的僧人,若骤得礼拜供养,便易误以为道业已成;赞誉盈耳,贡高我慢随之而生。贪嗔痴慢暗中增长,清净之心地为之蒙蔽,魔障亦由此而起。 昔日精进之志,也在种种应酬中日渐耗散。表面光鲜,实则空转;身披法衣,心离正道。 此辈既被名推而倒,便非身倒,而是心倒;非形弱,而是志失。其修行之根,已摇摇欲坠。 更有甚者,若耽于伪饰德相,自视甚高,便不但自误,亦误导众生。佛制明戒:“未得谓得,未证言证,是大妄语。” 若因名而生妄,虽无明言,内心亦犯实失。 久而久之,正信崩塌,德行损耗,堕落之路已悄然成型。或如提婆达多,因贪权夺势而堕入深渊,遗祸千古;或虽不至覆灭,亦如折翼之鸟,再难高飞于菩提之境。 二、明心见性,破妄归真 究其根本,修行之要,在于内观自性,不随外境所转。佛陀早示:众生本具如来智慧德相,惟妄想执著所障,故不能显现。换言之,自性之光本自圆明,惟因名利之尘覆之,令其黯淡。 “大和尚”之“大”,不在法座高低,众口称颂,而在其是否真实照见本心,明心见性。 唯有返照内心,破除执著,见诸法如幻,方可照亮修行之路。 如佛经所言:“名闻如暗影,惟智光内照,则影随光灭。”若以智慧观照自心,识得世间声名如镜花水月,便可安然行于红尘之中而不为其所染。 “自性光芒,照亮修行”。此为真修之道。外名可夺人耳目,却夺不了本性光明;浮荣可动人心志,却遮不住自心本觉。唯有慧眼自照,于妄中见真,于扰中守静,方为菩提正道。 三、淡泊明志,道在不言中 佛门中不乏警世之范,如印光大师、虚云老和尚等近代高僧,一生淡泊自守,不为名累,不受利役。十方供养,尽归弘法利生,不存毫末私心。正因他们以戒为体,以智慧自照,故能八风不动,荣辱不惊,愈陷尘劳,愈显道光。 由此可见,修行之根在己不在他;得道之要在证不在声。 外界千万人的敬仰,无法代替一人内心的觉悟;名利再盛,亦掩不住未明之心。 惟有自性光芒源源不息,日日照耀其心,方能守得寂寂道心,于喧嚣中自有一方清凉净土。 结语:返本归真,不负道心 僧人修行,贵在如莲花出淤泥而不染,身处红尘而心在道中。 凡被名声推上高位者,尤当时时自省:若德不配位,福难久持;若妄心生起,必招迷途。 自性光芒,照亮修行。唯返本归真,方不负出家初心;不逐名利,方可守得清净本愿;不迷虚妄,始得破妄归真。 愿一切修行者皆能以惭愧为衣,以清净为食,以定慧为灯,安住如如之境,行于无碍之道。如此,则道心不坠,菩提日增,既不致为名所推而倒,亦能于无声处,守得一灯长明。

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
View All Content