Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection

Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025

One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]

通往公民社会的三把钥匙:权力、责任、保障

Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025

文明走到今天,最大的进步,并不只是科技的高度,不只是城市的繁荣,而是人终于开始被当作“目的”而非“工具”。当个体从被统治者、被管理者,走向有思想、有声音、有担当的“社会公民”,我们进入了一个新的文明阶段。 在这个阶段,公民不再只是一个“法律身份”,而是一种人格理想、一种制度定位、一种社会存在方式。那么,作为一个成熟社会的公民,究竟应拥有什么?又该承担什么? 本文提出,权力、责任、保障,正是构成社会公民完整形象的三把“文明之剑”。它们既是权利的确认,也是义务的召唤;既是制度的恩赐,也是人格的锻造。 没有其中任何一项,公民的角色都不完整,社会的文明也就不成立。 一、权力:被承认的存在,是现代人的“我在” 在漫长的历史中,权力从来是少数人手中的特权,而多数人被安排、被管理、被牺牲,甚至不被记住。直到现代国家制度建立,才逐渐承认:每一个人都拥有参与决定自己命运的权力,这是文明的底线。 公民权力不是施舍,而是天赋 言论、选举、监督、罢免、结社、抗议……这些不是国家的恩赐,而是社会契约的基本条件。一个社会若要求公民服从法律、承担义务、遵守秩序,就必须首先赋予他们参与制定这些规则的权力。 权力,让公民成为社会的主人,而非命运的旁观者。 真正的“现代人”,首先是一个“有权表达、能对抗不公、有资格决定未来”的人。 权力是幸福的前提保障 没有权力,自由就可能被压制。 没有权力,尊严就可能被践踏。 没有权力,幸福就只能靠“恩赐”而非“正义”。 权力是幸福的第一道防线,是制度赋予每个人“主张生活方式”的能力。 因此,一个公民,必须意识到:我的权力,就是我存在的证明。捍卫它,不只是为了我自己,更是为了下一代人依然能生活在光亮中。 二、责任:自由的背后,是自我对社会的回应 文明不能只建立在“我要什么”,更要建立在“我该做什么”上。 权力如果没有责任相随,就会变成任性与滥用;自由如果不承担后果,就会滑向虚无和破坏。 在公民社会中,责任并非外在强加,而是源自内心的成熟。 公民责任,是对共同体的积极回应 纳税、服兵役、守法、关心公共事务、参与民主、尊重他人权利、关爱弱者……这些不只是制度条文,更是一种价值判断:我不只是我,我是社会的一部分。没有人是局外人,每一个人的不作为,都是社会瓦解的开始。 在一个高度复杂而多元的现代社会里,责任不仅是维系秩序的基础,更是让彼此信任得以建立的“看不见的契约”。 责任,是通往自由的另一条道路 有些人误解自由是“我想干嘛就干嘛”,却忘了,只有愿意为选择负责的人,才配拥有真正的自由。社会的自由不是“逃避管束”,而是“理解规则背后的善意”,是在“边界中自我主张”。 公民的责任,正是自由的倒影。它不是约束,而是一种自律的光,是我们为所爱之人、所信之事所主动承担的重量。 三、保障:制度的温度,是文明的底线 如果说权力和责任体现的是个体与集体之间的道德契约,那么保障则是制度对公民最基本的承诺与保护,是让每一个人“不至于掉下去”的“托底之手”。 公民保障,是现代国家存在的正当性 一个人不能因疾病而失去尊严,不能因贫困而失去希望,不能因出身而被剥夺未来。教育、医疗、养老、社会安全、就业机会、司法公正……这些不是“福利”,而是制度对人的基本尊重。 没有保障的公民,可能拥有“选票”,却没有“实质性的存在”;拥有“权利”,却过不上“有尊严的生活”。 保障,不是削弱人的能力,而是让每一个人都有机会站起来,有力气去追求自己的梦想。 保障是制度的道德,是幸福的基础 在一个健全的社会里,不应该有人因贫病而绝望,不应该有人因老去而被抛弃,不应该有人在受害后无处申诉。 真正的公民社会,是让每一个普通人,即便没有背景、没有资源、没有强关系,也能过上一种被尊重的人生。 这种保障,就是制度的良心,也是社会的温度,也是文明的体现。 四、三者统一:公民身份的立体构成 权力、责任、保障,是一个相互依赖、彼此制衡的有机整体: 只有当三者共同运作,才能实现真正的公民人格与现代社会的稳定。 这是现代国家的基本逻辑:以权力让人昂首、以责任让人自尊、以保障让人安心。 结语:赋权个体,照亮社会 文明的伟大,不在于它有多强大,而在于它能否使普通人也过上有光照,温暖的生活。 公民社会的理想,就是:在权力中找回声音,在责任中找回尊严,在保障中找回安全。 我们每一个人,不只是这个国家的一分子,更是这个时代的主人。我们拥有说“不”的权利,拥有说“是”的担当,也拥有在风雨中不被抛弃的底气。 权力,责任,保障——这三把公民之剑,不仅是现代社会给予我们的礼物,更是我们给下一代最好的传承。 一乘公益衷心的祝愿所有人都成为手握三剑的光明公民,用制度托起尊严,用责任维护自由,用保障安放幸福。

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content