4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

被阉割的民主:为什么全世界的“罢免”总是失败?

被阉割的民主:为什么全世界的“罢免”总是失败?

Kishou · Aug 7, 2025

引言: “民主”的表面风光中,藏着最隐秘的真相: 人民可以选人,却极难罢人。 在大多数民主国家中,罢免制度或如虚设,或成摆设,即使爆发大规模抗议,最终也大多无疾而终。 为什么“民主罢免”几乎从未成功? 这不是个战术问题,而是一个结构性真相。以下,从五大系统层级逐一分析。 一、制度设计层:罢免权从未被制度化为有效权力 民主国家的权力架构,本质是“有限代议制”,不是“直接公民制”: 对象 是否人民可控 实际约束来源 行政首脑(总统、总理) 一定程度上(选举) 政党与制度 议会议员 多数可选 党派纪律与资本输血 法官、军队、情报系统 几乎不可控 高阶任命与内网秩序 所谓“民主罢免”,其制度障碍包括: “制度伪装了权利,遮蔽了主权”。人民拥有“罢免”的名义,却没有“罢免”的实权。 二、权力结构层:政党-资本-行政三权共谋的自保体系 现代民主早已演化为“政党治理结构”,本质是: 人民→投票→政党→组织内升降 → 官僚系统 → 实权运作。 在这个体系中: 因此,所谓罢免,不是挑战一个官员,而是挑战一个完整共谋结构。 三、社会结构层:人民是分裂的、碎片化的,难以完成集体动员 罢免成功依赖于强大的社会共识和行动能力,但当代社会具有以下解构特征: 人民不再是统一力量,而是无数原子个体的散沙集合。 没有结构性的集体,罢免就永远只是少数人的孤勇抗争。 四、媒体与话语权层:公共舆论被资本和国家共管,民意沦为情绪风暴 媒体系统原本是民主制度的“第四权力”,但现实中: 结果是: 五、深层治理层:国家系统的“免疫机制”主动消解罢免运动 在国家治理的深层逻辑中,每个政治体都有一套“制度性免疫系统”,以维持稳定。 当罢免行动威胁到制度根基时,国家会动用以下手段: 在此层面,人民面对的是整个国家机器的反制。 所谓“罢免”,成了文明社会中的“系统性自焚”。 结语:罢免为何失败?因为人民并未真正掌握主权 “民主罢免”失败,不是偶然。它是: 制度性设计、权力结构性自保、社会结构性解体、话语权垄断与国家治理逻辑合力作用下的必然结果。 如果一个民主制度只在选举之时允许人民“发声”,而在治理过程中彻底屏蔽人民的纠错能力,那它不过是: 一场精心编排的仪式性游戏,一场用来安抚愤怒、分散注意、掩饰失控的舞台剧。   Photo by Kokuyo  

A governance model centered on complete citizens

A governance model centered on complete citizens

Daohe · Aug 7, 2025

The institutional evolution and historical trajectory of civil politics Produced by Yicheng Commonweal To those who truly love their country I. Opening: Who does true governance belong to? In today’s world, nearly every nation inscribes grand slogans such as “putting people first” or “rule of law” into its political declarations. These phrases are treated as […]

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content