4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Time, history, and how we understand them

Time, history, and how we understand them

Daohe · Jun 5, 2025

Since the dawn of human civilization, history has carried people’s collective memory and experience. People have long tried to draw lessons from it, hoping to avoid repeating past mistakes and to push society forward. Yet when we look back across thousands of years, the rise and fall of dynasties, the cycles of war and peace, […]

重新认识时间与历史的关系

重新认识时间与历史的关系

Daohe · Jun 5, 2025

自人类文明诞生以来,历史便承载着我们的集体记忆与经验。人们常试图从历史中汲取教训,以避免重蹈覆辙、推动社会进步。然而回顾数千年的文明演进,王朝更替、战争与和平、专制与反抗似乎反复出现,呈现出某种周期性的循环。 原因不在于历史本身,而在于我们看待历史的方式。 当我们以“时间线”的视角审视历史,历史就成为一个可以被分析、归纳与理解的对象,帮助我们辨识文明演化的脉络与制度演进的逻辑。 而当我们以既有的经验去类比现实,便容易落入命运论的思维模式,将历史简化为宿命的重复,使得经验的教训难以真正转化为制度变革或认知跃迁。 本文将从这两种不同的历史观出发,探讨它们对人类文明认知、集体心理及制度构建的深层影响,并尝试回答一个关键问题:为何我们常常意识到历史的教训,却依然难以摆脱文明困境的轮回? 一、时间线历史观:还原事实,厘清路径 将历史置于时间轴上,是一种理性且系统的观察方式。它以事实为基础,将事件依时间顺序展开,使过去不再只是模糊的传说或情绪化的记忆,而成为可以分析、理解的历史现实,具备因果关系与结构逻辑。 这种方式的核心价值在于: 时间线历史观的价值,在于它拒绝将历史视为命运的重演,而是强调变量的作用。 它承认历史的开放性与文明路径的多样性,强调人类行为的能动性与制度选择的重要性。 文明是否走向进步,并非由所谓的“历史规律”决定,而取决于我们如何面对现实、反思过去、选择未来。 二、历史中的历史观:经验循环与宿命陷阱 与以时间线为基础的理性观察不同,另一种更常见的历史理解方式,是在历史中看历史——即人们倾向于以过去的历史模式解读现实,并尝试从中提炼出“规律”,以此指导当下。 这种思维背后的动因,是人类对不确定性的天然恐惧。面对复杂多变的现实,我们倾向于从既有经验中寻找解释与预判路径,以此缓解对未来的焦虑。但正是这种趋向确定性的本能,容易滑向宿命论的深渊。 具体体现在以下几个方面: 以历史看历史,最大的危害是让历史教训合法化为历史规律,使当代人失去纠错与变革意志。 三、历史为何教而不改 为何人类社会屡次面对相似的灾难,却始终难以真正吸取教训?问题并不在于历史本身不清晰,而在于文明内部存在三种深层机制,使得历史教训在传承与转化过程中被系统性削弱,甚至失效。 1. 权力的自我维系机制 执政者与既得利益集团往往出于延续统治的需求,有意回避甚至篡改历史真相。前朝之覆可能被描述为“天命已尽”或“人心叵测”,而非制度崩溃或社会失衡。 这种对历史教训的选择性叙述,实质是为了削弱变革的正当性,从而维持现有秩序。 2. 集体认知的惰性机制 公共意识倾向于接受熟悉、线性、符合传统经验的解释,而对复杂性与不确定性保持天然警惕。这种认知惰性让社会更愿意接受“盛极必衰”这样的宿命叙事,而非深入剖析具体的制度性失败。 久而久之,历史经验被简化为模式,变成一种“心理安慰”,而非行动指南。 3. 叙事权的封闭控制机制 谁掌握叙事,谁就掌握历史的意义。在大多数社会中,历史往往由官方书写,反思性的民间声音则被边缘化甚至封锁。结果是,即使真实的教训存在,也难以进入主流教育与公共讨论,从而失去触达集体意识的渠道。 这三种机制相互交织,使文明难以形成有效的自我修正能力。历史不仅被遗忘,更被格式化、被利用,成为延续旧模式的工具,而非开启新路径的资源。 因此,哪怕灾难重演,社会依然可能选择熟悉但失败的方案,陷入一次次看似“不可避免”的轮回。 四、文明突围的现实路径 要真正吸取历史的教训,文明必须挣脱经验主义与宿命论的束缚,回归基于事实、逻辑和变量的历史理解。这种突围不是抽象的理念转变,而是现实中集体认知和制度实践的深刻重构。 这意味着: 结语 当我们将历史的发展置于时间线中去看待,历史便回归其真实面貌,成为文明认知自身演进路径的参照。 而当我们用既有的历史模式去解释现实与未来,便容易落入经验的循环与宿命的陷阱,使教训失效,让文明困于自我复制的轮回。 文明的进步并非时间推移的自然结果,也不是历史规律的自动演化。它的发展依赖于少数清醒之人——那些敢于质疑旧范式、突破经验窠臼、重构制度与秩序的人。他们推动时代断裂与文明重生,赋予历史真正的价值。

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content