4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

“Something deeper than belief” is the devil’s flute

“Something deeper than belief” is the devil’s flute

Master Wonder · Jun 4, 2025

In today’s world, the greatest threat is not war or massacre, but the hypocrites wearing masks of kindness, peace, and humanity. They use soft, comforting words to cover up evil, weaken justice, and dilute the truth. They preach “transcending ideology and belief,” claim “we are all connected” and share a “common humanity.” With this vague, […]

超越理念与信仰的做法,就是魔鬼的竹笛

超越理念与信仰的做法,就是魔鬼的竹笛

Master Wonder · Jun 4, 2025

当今世界,最可怕的并非战争与屠杀,而是那些披着善良、和平、人性面具的伪善者,他们用温情软话语掩盖罪恶、淡化正义、稀释真理。 他们鼓吹“超越理念与信仰”,宣称“我们彼此联结”“共有人性”,试图用一把虚无缥缈、善恶不分的道德绳索,把正义与邪恶捆绑在一起,把压迫者与受害者捆绑在一起,把屠夫与牺牲品捆绑在一起。 这,便是当代文明里最阴险、最温和、最容易被误以为善良的毒药。 “超越理念与信仰”本质是什么? 表面上,它似乎是在呼吁世界和平、种族和解、文明互助、性别平权。但本质上,它是在消灭价值判断、消解正义原则,最终让恶可以堂而皇之地自证“合理”,让压迫可以换个话术洗白成“文化差异”,让暴政可以用“社会秩序”的名义获得合法性。 他们打着人性的旗号,把世上所有罪恶与苦难虚化成“理解”“包容”“我们一样”,而把揭露者、反抗者、执守理念者污名化为“偏执”“极端”“不理性”。 当你质疑压迫,他们说:你太固执了,我们要超越理念。 当你捍卫正义,他们说:我们彼此联结,别太对立。 当你揭露恶行,他们说:这世界没有绝对的恶,大家都有血有肉。 ——这正是魔鬼温和的竹笛。 六大毒害: 这种“超越理念与信仰”的做法,是对全球人类文明、政治体系、社会秩序、人性认知、官僚结构、公共话语权的六重毒害: 1.政治之毒:虚伪合法性 当强权政体、掠夺政权、财阀资本打压人民、剥夺权利、侵害自由时,借助这种“超越理念”的说辞,将自己包装成“民族稳定”“社会秩序”“文化差异”。 于是,镇压叫“维护秩序”,封锁叫“避免对立”,消灭反对派叫“消除社会不安”。 政治暴力因此获得话术合法性,恶行变成“权力行使中的不得已”。 2.经济之毒:阶级固化 全球经济秩序长期依赖资本压迫与贫富不均,当底层民众怒吼反抗时,这类人就跳出来喊:“资本家和穷人都有血有肉,我们要理解他们”。 用“联结、理解、同理心”化解阶级对立,掩盖财富掠夺,软化社会矛盾。 最终让贫富差距、阶级鸿沟、殖民经济体系可以在温情麻醉下继续残酷运转。 3. 社会之毒:虚伪道德绑架 在全球公共舆论里,这套说辞让任何反抗者、批判者、理念坚守者陷入道德孤立。 一旦你对不义发声,他们说你“偏激”;一旦你揭露压迫,他们说你“不包容”。 社会舆论在这股温柔而阴险的情绪操控中,逐渐消灭激进性、反抗性、审判性,最终人人学会自我审查,人人害怕越界,社会失去反骨。 4. 文明之毒:去脊梁化 伟大文明源于价值理念、信仰体系的坚持与捍卫,而“超越理念与信仰”的逻辑,等同于文明自阉。 不再坚持自由、公义、尊严、信仰、不平则鸣,转而鼓吹“和平共处、各有立场”。 这实际上等同于允许文明之间的极恶暴政、屠杀、剥夺继续存在,只要你不对它发声,就不算罪恶。 长久以往,文明失去反抗精神,成为软绵绵、妥协化、平庸苟安的废墟。 5. 人性之毒:温和奴化 在个体认知上,这套话术培养出一代代习惯于麻痹自己、合理化恶行的人。 他们学会理解施暴者,怜悯剥削者,原谅权力者,而对真正捍卫者反而视为“极端危险”。 人类社会在这种“软性人性麻醉”下,逐渐丧失愤怒、抵抗、揭露恶行的能力。 6. 官吏之毒:腐败共谋 尤其在官僚体系内,这种“超越理念”的话术,成了压制异己、敷衍问责、掩盖腐败的最佳借口。 任何质疑都被说成“过于情绪化”,任何追责都被包装成“破坏稳定”。 腐败者与维稳者形成一套互保体制,借助这套温情麻醉话术,共同收割权力与资源。 结语:文明必须有脊梁 理念可以进化,信仰可以升级,但绝不能被放弃、超越、篡改。 真正的文明,正是靠价值边界来保护弱者、审判恶行、维护正义。 任何试图“超越理念、超越信仰”的人,无论外表多么可爱、语言多么善良,本质都是在替恶行争夺合法性,在为魔鬼吹笛。 而为这套理论说辞喝彩和鼓掌的人,你们要对自己的这种魔鬼行为而忏悔,而不是不住的点头同意笑声满堂。  我们可以善良,但绝不愚蠢。我们有同理心,但不为伪善鼓掌。 文明脊梁,从不在于虚伪的“联结”,而在于清晰的价值边界和毫不妥协的正义执守。

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content