Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · 6월 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”

How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”

Kishou · 2월 5, 2026

Preface: Employment is Not Just a “Livelihood,” but a Basic License for Civic Existence In capitalist ideology, “employment” is brutally reduced to a purely instrumental equation: “Job → Income → Survival.” This logic chains human existence to capital’s hiring whims, systematically equating joblessness with social worthlessness. Unemployment becomes morally weaponized—branded as proof of personal inadequacy, market […]

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

Kishou · 2월 5, 2026

前言:雇用は「生計」ではなく、市民が社会に存在するための「基本的許可」である 資本経済のイデオロギーでは、「雇用」は道具的な定義に乱暴に単純化されています。 「仕事がある→収入がある→収入があって初めて生きていける」 この論理は人の生存権と資本の雇用需要を強固に結びつけ、「仕事がない」ことを「あなたは社会に価値がない」とシステム的に決めつけてしまいます。 「失業」は道徳的な汚名を着せられます。 個人の能力不足、市場競争での脱落、自分の責任による失敗の証拠として扱われ、本人の心の中で自分を責める気持ちを生み出します。 「ベーシックインカム(UBI)」は制度的にタブー視されます。 「怠け者を甘やかすもの」「効率を損なうもの」「神聖な市場の法則に逆らう異端の福祉」として排斥されています。 しかし、社会市民経済(Socio-Civic Economy)の考え方では、恐怖と効率至上主義に基づくこうした認識を根本から変える必要があります。 雇用とは: 市場がたまたま与えてくれる機会ではなく、市民が社会の生産活動やサービス、そして文明の成果を分かち合うことに参加する「基本的な権利」です。 失業とは: 個人の能力の問題ではなく、技術の進歩や産業の変化によって生まれる「構造的なリスク」です。 ベーシックインカムとは: 施しではなく、市民が「社会共同体の一員」として当然受け取るべき、社会の共有財産に対する「最低限の配当」です。 これは、「資本中心の効率的な市場社会」と「人間中心の市民文明社会」との間にある、倫理的かつ制度的な根本の分水嶺です。 一、資本経済下の雇用の本質:「人を活かす」のではなく「価値を搾り取る」 資本が主導する経済では、雇用の根本的な目的は冷酷で単純です。 人の生存や尊厳を守るためではありません。生産コストを下げ、資本の利益を最大化することが目的です。 労働者は、自分で考え行動する社会の一員としてではなく、いつでも取り替えのきく「値段のついた部品」として扱われます。 こうして、システムは冷酷で絶えず最適化される搾取の仕組みを自然に作り出します: 使える人(コスパが良い) → システムに残り、終わりのない競争と成果評価を受け入れる 今は使えない人(コスパが悪い/転職が必要) → システムから捨てられ、安く買い叩かれるのを待つリスクを背負う個人になる もう使えない人(技術の進歩で不要になった) → 文明から見捨てられ、社会保障の重荷となる いわゆる「ギグワーク」「柔軟な働き方」「フリーランス」の多くは、実際には資本による巧妙な搾取です。 安定した保障も社会保険も労働組合もない労働者を利用するための「聞こえの良い言葉」に過ぎません。 資本は、労働者が長期的に安定して暮らし、成長し、老後を過ごせるかどうかには関心がありません。関心があるのは、今この瞬間の「コストと利益が十分に見合うかどうか」だけです。 二、社会市民経済による「雇用」の再定義:ポストではなく「社会参画権」 社会市民経済では、「雇用」の定義を根本から変える必要があります。 狭い意味での「資本に労働力を提供すること」から、「市民が社会の生産活動、公共サービス、統治、ケア、知識創造に参加するための制度的な道筋」へと発展させなければなりません。 これは、価値ある労働がもはや「直接お金を生む労働」だけではないことを意味します。 以下のような労働も含まれます(ただし、これらに限定されません): 公共サービス型雇用(Public Service Jobs): 政府や非営利組織が提供する、全市民向けの基礎的なサービス。 社会ケア型雇用(Social Care): 高齢者、子供、障害を持つ人々へのケアと感情的サポート。 コミュニティ建設・文化型雇用(Community & Cultural): 地域統治、文化継承、芸術創作、非営利的な教育。 生態系修復型雇用(Ecological Restoration): 環境保護、汚染対策、持続可能な発展プロジェクト。 価値認定の原則: あなたの労働が以下の特徴を備えている限り: 社会に対して真実かつ代替不可能な価値(Real Social Value)を持っている。 公共の安全とレジリエンス(強靭性)に対して真実の貢献(Public Resilience Contribution)をしている。 共同体の存続に対して真実の支え(Communal Support)となっている。 そうした労働は正当な仕事として認められ、安定した尊厳ある収入と制度的な保障を受けるべきです。 そうでなければ、社会は必然的におかしな状況に陥ります。本当に価値のあること(介護や基礎研究など)をする人がいなくなり、お金にはなるが価値の低いこと(金融投機や広告の過当競争など)に人が殺到するという構造的な矛盾です。 三、失業の文明的定性:「敗者」ではなく「構造的リスクの引き受け手」 資本経済の道徳観では、失業は個人の失敗という恥です。 努力不足、能力不足、市場への適応力不足として制度的に扱われてきました。この屈辱的な決めつけは、社会の不安定さと個人の精神的な重荷を大幅に増やしています。 しかし社会市民経済では、失業の本当の性質を道徳的な判断から切り離し、客観的に捉え直す必要があります。 失業とは、技術の進歩、産業の移転、世界的な資本の変動、政策の変更などのシステム全体の力によって引き起こされる「構造的な犠牲」なのです。 核心となる論理: 核心となる考え方: […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · 4월 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · 5월 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · 12월 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · 2월 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
View All Content