Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Juin 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early « states » were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that « sovereignty belongs to the people. » The U.S. Constitution established a « government of the people » and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of « rule by the people » exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
The Catastrophic Consequences of Test-Oriented Education in the AI Era

The Catastrophic Consequences of Test-Oriented Education in the AI Era

Daohe · Jan 30, 2026

Preface: As AI Illuminates the Future, Humanity Retreats The artificial intelligence revolution should herald a « singularity » moment for human civilization—a time when knowledge becomes nearly free, tools amplify human capability exponentially, and individual creativity emerges as our most valuable asset. Yet a profound irony unfolds before us: while machines evolve at breathtaking speed, our educational […]

AI時代における受験教育の壊滅的な結末

AI時代における受験教育の壊滅的な結末

Daohe · Jan 30, 2026

前書き:AIが未来を照らす時、人類は後退している 人工知能(AI)の波は、本来なら人類文明の「特異点」を告げるはずでした。 知識を得るコストはゼロに近づき、ツールの効率は無限に拡大され、個人の創造性が最高の価値を持つ生産力として尊ばれる——そんな時代の到来のはずでした。 ところが、深刻な皮肉が進行しています。 機械がかつてないスピードで「進化」する一方で、私たち(特に多くの国々)の教育システムは、加速度的に「退化」しているように見えるのです。 私たちは今もなお、工業時代の古びた枠組みを使い続けています。 「標準化された試験の成績」だけを尺度とする選別システム——これで次世代を形成しようとしているのです。 このシステムの目的は啓発ではありません。規律です。 潜在能力の解放ではなく、「規格化された製品」の製造なのです。 AIの強い光が社会構造のあらゆる層を貫こうとしている今、私たちは頑なに受験教育という影で、未来を担うべき子供たちを覆い隠そうとしています。 これは単なる遅れではありません。 一種の裏切りなのです。 文明の存続に関わる災厄の根幹が、今この瞬間、静かに築かれているのです。 一、AI時代における受験教育の「乖離」:本来存在すべきではない制度的遅滞 受験教育は、最初から間違っていたわけではありません。 それは特定の時代の産物でした。 その誕生は、二つの明確な目的に奉仕するためでした: 工業時代のラインが求める「標準化された労働者」の需要 官僚機構が求める「標準化された管理者」の大規模な選抜 あの時代、効率がすべてを支配していました。 受験教育の根本的なロジックは、まさにその効率を実現するためのものでした。個性を排除し、差異を抑圧し、生身の個人を代替可能で予測可能、かつ管理可能な「部品」へと磨き上げる——。 それが追求したのは「卓越」ではなく「平均的な良さ」であり、「独創」ではなく「服従」でした。 しかし、AI時代の根本的なロジックは、これとは真逆です。 AIの本質とは、「標準化」の究極的な実現と超越にあります。肉体的であれ知的であれ、反復的でプロセス化され、予測可能なすべての労働はAIが引き継ぐことになります。 したがって、この時代が求めているのは、機械には代替不可能なすべてです。すなわち、「非標準的」な創造者であり、複雑なシステムを見抜く統合者であり、究極の問いを立てる思考者です。 ここに、巨大で致命的な構造的乖離が生まれています。 時代が求めているのは独自の魂を持つ個人であるのに、私たちの教育は、認知が統一された「操り人形」を大量生産し続けているのです。 この「乖離」は、もはや単なる「制度の遅れ」ではありません。文明の発展方向に対する根本的な対立なのです。 それは現代における最大の無駄であり、未来への最も重い足枷となっています。 二、受験教育によって形作られた「新時代の木偶の坊」 AIという鏡に照らされたとき、受験教育に長く浸かり形作られてきた「高得点・低能力」な人々の本質的な問題が浮き彫りになります。 彼らの能力が「足りるか」どうかではありません。その能力構造が「適切か」どうかが問われているのです。 彼らには憂慮すべき共通の特徴が見られます。 準備不足なのではありません。時代によって直接淘汰されようとしている——魂を抜かれた木偶のように、未来の奔流の中で身動きが取れなくなっているのです。 1. 思考の喪失:AIが答えられる問題を、人間がいまだに暗記している 受験教育の核心は、思考の炎を灯すことではありません。記憶の倉庫を満たすことです。 「標準回答」で「批判的思考」を置き換え、「解法パターン」で「第一原理」をすり替えました。 しかし、悲しい現実があります。 記憶の広さ、検索の速さ、分析の精度、計算の強度——これらすべてにおいて、どんなに優秀な人間の学生も、AIの前では完全に敗北しているのです。 「博覧強記」と「高速計算」を核とする子供が心血を注いで磨いたスキルは、すべてAIが1分以内に上回ってしまう領域なのです。 教育システムが「より機械に近い」振る舞いに報酬を与えるとき、それは「より人間らしい」資質を組織的に罰していることになります。好奇心、懐疑精神、複雑性の探究といった人類の宝物を。 人類の最も貴重な深い思考能力は、こうして「問題演習」というノイズの中で少しずつ削り取られていくのです。 2. 表現の喪失:問いを立てられず、対話ができず、言葉を持たない 受験教育が生み出すのは「回答する人」です。「問いを立てる人」ではありません。 あらかじめ設定された枠組みの中で「正しい」答えを出すよう要求し、枠組みを超えて前提そのものを疑うことは奨励しません。 しかし、AI時代において答えは安価です。過剰ですらあります。 本当に希少なのは「良い問い」を立てる能力です。 未来の社会で最も重要な能力は「いかに解決するか」ではなく「何を解決すべきかを定義すること」なのです。 機械的な暗記ではなく、異なる個人や文化、さらにはAI自身との深い対話。基準に合わせることではなく、独自の知見を明確に表現すること——これらが求められています。 木偶の坊に口は要りません。入力されたプログラムを実行するだけで十分だからです。 受験教育は、本来生き生きとしているはずの世代を、沈黙し受動的で指令を待つだけの生物学的プログラムへと訓練してしまっています。 3. 方向性の喪失:残るのは服従と恐怖だけで、自己も渇望もない 受験教育の「隠れたカリキュラム」は、目に見えるカリキュラムよりもはるかに強い影響力を持っています。 […]

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · Mai 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Juin 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mai 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a « perfect abyss » has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
View All Content