Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets

Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]

 

On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has its unique logic and value orientation, which shape people’s attitude towards life and their approaches.

First Level: the Grassroot Mindset

Grassroots mindset is based on a public mentality. For people thinking in this way, life has no clear goals. All the efforts and struggles are for the better now. They may seek daily comfort, short-term happiness, or simple satisfaction, prioritizing immediate enjoyment over long-term planning. As a result, they are more likely to go with the flow in life, lacking a long-term vision and profound reflection on life.

Grassroots thinking is often prevalent at the lower levels of society, as it is closely related to urgency in pursuing immediate profits and safety. Under the pressures of life, many people would choose this mindset, because it is simple, direct, and provides a sense of content in the short term. However, the downside of grassroot thinking is also obvious. It traps individuals in complacency, dilutes their ambition and makes it difficult to break free from their current lifestyle and self-perception.

Grassroots thinking isn’t limited to those at the bottom of society; many people with social resources also fail to plan effectively and think long-term. A notable example is the Roman Emperor Nero, notorious for his extravagant lifestyle and indulgence. His reign was marked by a lack of clear political goals or a vision for the future, as he prioritized personal pleasure over state affairs. Nero had a deep passion for music and the arts, often performing on stage, while remaining indifferent to governance. During the Great Fire of Rome, there were rumors that he played the lyre and sang while the city was engulfed in flames.

Nero’s behavior represents the shortsightedness and self-centeredness of grassroots thinking. He lacked higher ideals or a sense of social responsibility, focusing solely on personal sensory pleasures, which ultimately led to public rebellion and his own downfall. His rule is also considered a significant reason for the decline of the Roman Empire due to its extravagance and brutality. This shows that when grassroots thinking manifests in those in power, the dangers are even greater; without vision and responsibility, it can lead to a dual failure for both individuals and society.

Second Level: the Elite Mindset

Elite thinking is based on seeking “the best” and “the extraordinary” in the mainstream values. Life is no longer about easy pleasures but money, power, and social status. For people with this mindset, one can gain whatever they want through ongoing efforts and relentless attempts. Therefore, these people tend to have clear goals and strive to improve personal values and achieve success.

This mindset is often found among those who grow up with financial advantages or privileged backgrounds, but also among people who work hard to improve themselves. Elite thinking drives people to push their limits and become a go-getter for higher achievements and social status. However, these people often place too much emphasis on personal success and social recognition, which may lead to a disconnection from inner needs and the deeper meanings of life. It might also cause a lack of compassion for others and emotional coldness, making it difficult for them to connect genuinely with themselves and others.

Napoleon Bonaparte is a prime example of elite thinking. He started out in a humble background but worked tirelessly and showcased incredible military skills to become the Emperor of the First French Empire. His main goal was to build a powerful empire through constant warfare and expansion, driven by his personal ambitions. Throughout his career, he faced numerous challenges and was fueled by his ambition, rising from an ordinary officer to the emperor who ruled over Europe, always chasing the heights of power.

Napoleon’s elite thinking is reflected in his desire for power and relentless pursuit of achievement. Through his personal efforts and leadership abilities, he gained widespread social status and historical influence. However, his failures also remind us that an excessive pursuit of material wealth and power can lead to the neglect of other important values.

Third Level: the Extraordinary Mindset

The core idea behind the extraordinary mindset is all about “love and compassion.” In this way of thinking, life doesn’t necessarily have a specific goal. However, because they deeply understand the struggles of others, people often feel empathy and a desire to help those in need. At their heart, those with this mindset aim to serve others and ease their suffering. This isn’t something forced upon them; it comes from a genuine understanding of human pain and a selfless concern for others.

Interestingly, people with an extraordinary mindset often come from humble backgrounds rather than privileged ones. Their life experiences give them a deep understanding of life’s struggles, which drives them to take on responsibility for others’ suffering instead of just looking out for their own interests. This mindset not only gives them strong inner strength but also helps them develop a broader perspective and a higher sense of purpose.

Mahatma Gandhi is a great example of the extraordinary mindset. Born into a regular family in India, he became a lawyer and had the chance to live a more comfortable life, but he chose to lead the fight for independence instead. He promoted the idea of “non-violent non-cooperation” and often went on hunger strikes to protest for the well-being of the people and social justice, willingly enduring physical pain. His goal wasn’t about seeking personal honor or wealth. Instead, he aimed to change society through his actions and help people break free from colonial oppression.

Gandhi’s extraordinary mindset shines through in how he put love and compassion at the center of his actions, rising above personal interests. He was committed to serving humanity and tackling social injustices and suffering. His ideas and actions have had a lasting impact, not just in India but also offering valuable inspiration for peace movements around the world.

Through the stories of these historical figures, we see various life attitudes and how different mindsets shape their paths and achievements. These mindsets influence individual lifestyles and leave distinct marks on history.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”

How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”

Kishou · Feb 5, 2026

Preface: Employment is Not Just a “Livelihood,” but a Basic License for Civic Existence In capitalist ideology, “employment” is brutally reduced to a purely instrumental equation: “Job → Income → Survival.” This logic chains human existence to capital’s hiring whims, systematically equating joblessness with social worthlessness. Unemployment becomes morally weaponized—branded as proof of personal inadequacy, market […]

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

Kishou · Feb 5, 2026

前言:雇用は「生計」ではなく、市民が社会に存在するための「基本的許可」である 資本経済のイデオロギーでは、「雇用」は道具的な定義に乱暴に単純化されています。 「仕事がある→収入がある→収入があって初めて生きていける」 この論理は人の生存権と資本の雇用需要を強固に結びつけ、「仕事がない」ことを「あなたは社会に価値がない」とシステム的に決めつけてしまいます。 「失業」は道徳的な汚名を着せられます。 個人の能力不足、市場競争での脱落、自分の責任による失敗の証拠として扱われ、本人の心の中で自分を責める気持ちを生み出します。 「ベーシックインカム(UBI)」は制度的にタブー視されます。 「怠け者を甘やかすもの」「効率を損なうもの」「神聖な市場の法則に逆らう異端の福祉」として排斥されています。 しかし、社会市民経済(Socio-Civic Economy)の考え方では、恐怖と効率至上主義に基づくこうした認識を根本から変える必要があります。 雇用とは: 市場がたまたま与えてくれる機会ではなく、市民が社会の生産活動やサービス、そして文明の成果を分かち合うことに参加する「基本的な権利」です。 失業とは: 個人の能力の問題ではなく、技術の進歩や産業の変化によって生まれる「構造的なリスク」です。 ベーシックインカムとは: 施しではなく、市民が「社会共同体の一員」として当然受け取るべき、社会の共有財産に対する「最低限の配当」です。 これは、「資本中心の効率的な市場社会」と「人間中心の市民文明社会」との間にある、倫理的かつ制度的な根本の分水嶺です。 一、資本経済下の雇用の本質:「人を活かす」のではなく「価値を搾り取る」 資本が主導する経済では、雇用の根本的な目的は冷酷で単純です。 人の生存や尊厳を守るためではありません。生産コストを下げ、資本の利益を最大化することが目的です。 労働者は、自分で考え行動する社会の一員としてではなく、いつでも取り替えのきく「値段のついた部品」として扱われます。 こうして、システムは冷酷で絶えず最適化される搾取の仕組みを自然に作り出します: 使える人(コスパが良い) → システムに残り、終わりのない競争と成果評価を受け入れる 今は使えない人(コスパが悪い/転職が必要) → システムから捨てられ、安く買い叩かれるのを待つリスクを背負う個人になる もう使えない人(技術の進歩で不要になった) → 文明から見捨てられ、社会保障の重荷となる いわゆる「ギグワーク」「柔軟な働き方」「フリーランス」の多くは、実際には資本による巧妙な搾取です。 安定した保障も社会保険も労働組合もない労働者を利用するための「聞こえの良い言葉」に過ぎません。 資本は、労働者が長期的に安定して暮らし、成長し、老後を過ごせるかどうかには関心がありません。関心があるのは、今この瞬間の「コストと利益が十分に見合うかどうか」だけです。 二、社会市民経済による「雇用」の再定義:ポストではなく「社会参画権」 社会市民経済では、「雇用」の定義を根本から変える必要があります。 狭い意味での「資本に労働力を提供すること」から、「市民が社会の生産活動、公共サービス、統治、ケア、知識創造に参加するための制度的な道筋」へと発展させなければなりません。 これは、価値ある労働がもはや「直接お金を生む労働」だけではないことを意味します。 以下のような労働も含まれます(ただし、これらに限定されません): 公共サービス型雇用(Public Service Jobs): 政府や非営利組織が提供する、全市民向けの基礎的なサービス。 社会ケア型雇用(Social Care): 高齢者、子供、障害を持つ人々へのケアと感情的サポート。 コミュニティ建設・文化型雇用(Community & Cultural): 地域統治、文化継承、芸術創作、非営利的な教育。 生態系修復型雇用(Ecological Restoration): 環境保護、汚染対策、持続可能な発展プロジェクト。 価値認定の原則: あなたの労働が以下の特徴を備えている限り: 社会に対して真実かつ代替不可能な価値(Real Social Value)を持っている。 公共の安全とレジリエンス(強靭性)に対して真実の貢献(Public Resilience Contribution)をしている。 共同体の存続に対して真実の支え(Communal Support)となっている。 そうした労働は正当な仕事として認められ、安定した尊厳ある収入と制度的な保障を受けるべきです。 そうでなければ、社会は必然的におかしな状況に陥ります。本当に価値のあること(介護や基礎研究など)をする人がいなくなり、お金にはなるが価値の低いこと(金融投機や広告の過当競争など)に人が殺到するという構造的な矛盾です。 三、失業の文明的定性:「敗者」ではなく「構造的リスクの引き受け手」 資本経済の道徳観では、失業は個人の失敗という恥です。 努力不足、能力不足、市場への適応力不足として制度的に扱われてきました。この屈辱的な決めつけは、社会の不安定さと個人の精神的な重荷を大幅に増やしています。 しかし社会市民経済では、失業の本当の性質を道徳的な判断から切り離し、客観的に捉え直す必要があります。 失業とは、技術の進歩、産業の移転、世界的な資本の変動、政策の変更などのシステム全体の力によって引き起こされる「構造的な犠牲」なのです。 核心となる論理: 核心となる考え方: […]

read more

Related Content

Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Freedom and Happiness or Servitude? 2 Paths in Life
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 2, 2025
On life’s long journey, each of us constantly faces choices — choices that ultimately shape our destiny. At the core, these choices often boil down to two distinct paths: one that chases wealth, fame, and material success, and another that seeks inner freedom and happiness, democracy and peace. Many people mistakenly believe that wealth and […]
How Kindness Can Revive Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]
The Two Sides of Living: Democracy or Slavery
The Two Sides of Living: Democracy or Slavery
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 28, 2025
To be human is not just about biological survival, but about the growth of our spirit and soul. However, the meaning of “living” varies greatly at different stages of history and civilization. Some live in fear, oppression, and deception, simply striving to survive in chaotic times, indifferent to right or wrong. Others live in awakening, […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
View All Content