Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]

In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response mechanism that exerts the power of democratic union at school and social level and fundamentally prevents and deals with the problem. In this article, the purpose and details of this mechanism will be elaborated and well explained.

Understanding the Cause of Bullying

When it comes to the reasons of bully, practically everything is on the list. From collective characteristics including race, gender, religions to individual traits such as appearance, body size, clothes, accents and life style, all these features can be the “problem” with the victims. Fundamentally, the behaviors of bullying stems from a lack of tolerance. And when individual bullying escalates into group bullying, it becomes more about political siding.

The central figures in a bullying group usually enjoy the social power in the group, which may come from their appearance, status, popularity, and other desirable traits. While other students in the group typically feel the need to please the central figures by proving themselves through bullying. As for the onlookers, they refrain from helping the victim to avoid becoming targets themselves. In a word, bullying is essentially a loss of balance in political power. From this perspective, a highly effective way of saving the victims from the vicious circle of bullying is to introduce an external democratic power so as to balance the power struggle between victims and bullies.

Combating Bullying through a democratic approach

The key is to introduce and exert the power of democracy in a rational and reasonable way. For the past decades, we have witnessed the strength of democratic union in various campaigns against injustice and inequality. It is fair to say that broad political alliances and collective democratic efforts are crucial in reducing unfair phenomena and countering violence. And the same applies to school bullying. With an extensive attention to the problem, people will be more aware of the issue and more likely to take actions to help the victims.

Democratic struggle focuses on raising awareness and cutting down on discrimination and violence, while personal revenge can lead to extreme behaviors and causing further psychological problems for the victims. We want to avoid these undesirable outcomes and ensure students grow up in a supportive environment. Therefore, schools should provide a safe, inclusive, positive and constructive way for students to strike back against bullying.

Building an Intervention System at school-community-society level

Schools and communities need to work together to establish an extensive democratic intervention mechanism, in order to tackle bullying effectively and turn bullying into a force to promote the progress of social democracy. While many current solutions of school bullying focus on prevention and mediation, they overlook the power of democratic union among students themselves, which is the key to address the problem in a sustainable way.

First of all, schools should introduce a democratic pledge of anti-bullying for student organizations or school clubs, which should include clear definition of bullying and encourage student groups to stand against it. Student groups that sign the pledge promise to oppose any form of violence, discrimination and bullying, both within and outside their groups. If bullying occurs and the victim seeks help from the group, group members have the responsibility to reach out and support the victims. As a reward, the student groups that sign the pledge will gain opportunities or recommendation for both individual growth and group development. By involving the efforts of student organizations, schools will be able to create an extensive support network for the victims of bullying.

Once signing the pledge, group members must discuss and devise internal anti-bullying rules with the help of the school office — as a part of commitment. Different student groups have their own internal policies against school bullying. To avoid misuse of power and ensure justice, schools should form a committee of teachers, parents, student representatives and community members to review anti-bullying policies and supervise the operation of the system. There should be an anonymous reporting channels for students to report issues without fears.

When there are conflicts among group members, the leaders should take positive actions to settle the conflicts and offer help for members who are bullied. Victims outside these groups can also seek help from members, who have a responsibility to provide assistance. If the leaders or members are found to favor or protect the bully, or turn a blind eye to the bullying behaviors, they will have their rewards cancelled and be reported by the school.

Such an intervention system fully encourages mutual support among students and provides structured help for the victims of school bullying. On the other hand, the system integrates democratic processes into the anti-bullying framework. It also empowers students to engage in civic activities and understand the importance of democracy and collective action. This engagement can help students develop critical life skills, such as conflict resolution, empathy, and leadership, which are valuable beyond the school environment.

Providing Guidance and Care for Bullies

One potential concern is that the anti-bullying policies may pose a threat to the reputation of the bullies and lead to social exclusion for them. It is thus essential for policy makers to bear in mind that the anti-bullying mechanism targets at resolving bullying behaviors instead of punishing individuals. When educating the students on the impact of bullying, schools should encourage them to treat the bullies in a rational way, which is crucial for the bullies to reflect on and adjust their behaviors. When the issue is settled, both the bully and the victim should have the opportunity to access psychological support and guidance. The bullies should get counseling which helps them develop positive social skills and reintegrate into the school and community.

By establishing a robust intervention system, the phenomenon of school bullying will be greatly relieved. The system is designed as a sustainable method to strike against bullying. Its emphasis on democratic values and civic engagement will also cultivate a more inclusive, supportive and responsible school culture. If the mechanism is implemented in regions, states and even the whole nation, an extensive anti-bullying line will be built up, extending to communities and the whole society.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

なぜ権力は民衆の福祉を改善する提案に耳を貸さないのか:世界的権力の無関心、その制度的解剖

なぜ権力は民衆の福祉を改善する提案に耳を貸さないのか:世界的権力の無関心、その制度的解剖

Kishou · Jul 25, 2025

一、序論:権力の「善意による覚醒」に期待するのは、もうやめよう 公共の危機が勃発し、社会問題が急増するたび、人々は決まってこう叫びます。「政府は民衆の声を聞くべきだ」と。 しかし、歴史と現実は繰り返し証明しています—— 彼らは聞くことはない。聞きたくもなく、聞くことが許さず、そもそも本気で聞くつもりなどないのだ、と。 私たちが暴くべきは、その背後にある制度的ロジックです。 政府がもし少数者のためだけに奉仕するのなら、必然的に民衆の幸福を厄介な重荷、甚だしきは脅威と見なすようになります。 このような構造の中では、民衆の生活を改善しようとするいかなる善意や提案も、「必要とされない妨害」でしかありません。 これはどこか特定の国の問題でも、特定の指導者の品性の問題でもありません。 これは、世界中のあらゆる場所で見られる、制度的な慣性なのです。 二、なぜ提案は採用されないのか? それは「特権の安定構造」を揺るがすからだ 1. 聞き入れることは、構造的欠陥を認めることを意味する 政府がもし庶民からの提案を一つでも採用したなら、それは以下のことを認めるに等しいのです。 そしてこれこそが、特権システムが最も容認できないことなのです。 2. 聞き入れることは、資源の流れを変える可能性がある 民衆に有益な提案のほとんどは、次のことを要求します: そしてこれらの提案こそ、まさに権力者や富裕層が決して譲歩したくない一線なのです。 三、グローバルな実例:生活改善の提案は、いかにして組織的に無視されるか 以下の実例は、異なる文化、制度、国家から来ていますが、共通の現象を明らかにしています。権力が少数者のためだけに奉仕する時、民衆は政策決定の輪から排除されるのです。 √ケース1:アメリカ——40年間否決され続ける銃規制法案 アメリカでは毎年4万人以上の市民が銃によって命を落としていますが、厳格な銃規制を主張するすべての法案は、議会によって否決されてきました。 理由はきわめてシンプルです。 民衆の安全を求める声は、常に特権集団の既得権益の前に敗れ去るのです。 √ケース2:インド——農業三法案への農民の抗議、政府は長年無視 2020年以降、インドの数十万人の農民が農業自由化法案に反対しました。彼らが明確に指摘したのは以下の点です。 政府は一年以上にわたる抗議を無視しただけでなく、暴力による強制排除や、水道・インターネットの遮断といった手段さえ用いました。 民衆が首都を数ヶ月にわたり封鎖するに至って、ようやく一部法案を渋々撤回しましたが、補償や関係修復については一切語られませんでした。 これは典型的な「聞かず、見ず、変えず、強大な圧力によってのみ譲歩する」姿勢です。 √ ケース3:フランス——民意に逆らう年金改革の強行採決 2023年、フランス政府は「財政の持続可能性を確保するため」という理由で、議会を迂回し、定年退職年齢の引き上げを柱とする年金改革を強行しました。 しかし、 「民主主義の模範」と称されるフランスでさえ、権力は民衆の意思よりも、資本の安定を優先したのです。 √ ケース4:ブラジル——アマゾンの先住民の叫びは、決して聞き届けられない 数十年もの間、ブラジルの先住民は、アマゾン熱帯雨林の伐採を制限するよう政府に繰り返し訴えてきました。 政府は公には何度も環境保護を約束しましたが、裏では「合法を装った」採掘許可を出し、罰則を形骸化させ、時には企業を守るために軍隊まで動かしました。 民衆の生態系保護を求める声は、外資と一次産品輸出による短期的な利益の誘惑に勝てなかったのです。 √ケース5:フィリピン——貧困層からの改善提案は「反政府的言論」と見なされる フィリピン・マニラのスラム街の地域組織は、長年にわたり次のことを訴えてきました。 これらの提案は決して急進的なものではありません。しかし、政府からはしばしば「国家の安定を揺るがす」と指摘され、一部のNGOは「潜在的な転覆勢力」としてリストアップされることさえあります。 民主政体の下でさえ、貧しい人々が提出した合理的な改善提案は、社会の安定を維持するという名目の下で、弾圧の対象となるのです。 四、制度の深層構造:なぜ彼らは、そもそも「民衆の声を聞く必要がない」のか 1. 政治権力は、とうの昔に資本の利益ネットワークに「捕獲」されている 多くの国の政治システムは、表向きは民主体制でも、実質的には財閥、多国籍企業、金融資本と固く結びついています。 2. 行政システムは、「権力者への応答を優先する」という慣性を形成している かくして政策は何度となく変わりますが、民衆の生活が「考慮の範囲」に入ることはないのです。 五、良い提案をすることは、自らを「危険人物」だと暴露するに等しい 多くの国で、草の根のNGO、学者、コミュニティ活動家が「提案が的確すぎ、正論すぎる」という理由で、社会の周縁に追いやられ、誤解され、時には弾圧されてきました。 提案者の専門性と理性こそが、皮肉にも彼らの無関心さを証明してしまうのです。 六、改善策を知らないのではなく、「公平な社会」を創造する気がないのだ […]

为什么绝不会听从改善人民福祉的办法:全球权力冷漠的制度剖析

为什么绝不会听从改善人民福祉的办法:全球权力冷漠的制度剖析

Kishou · Jul 25, 2025

一、引言:别再期待权力“善意觉醒” 每当公共危机爆发、社会问题激增,总有人呼吁:“政府该听听人民的声音了。” 但历史和现实反复证明—— 他们不会听、不想听、不允许听,也从未真正打算听。 而最该被揭露的,是这背后的制度逻辑: 政府如果只是为少数人服务,就必然将人民的福祉当作累赘,甚至威胁。 在这样的结构中,任何改善人民生活的好意与建议,都是“不被需要的干扰”。 这不是某个国家的问题,也不是某个领导人的心术问题。 这是一种制度性惯性,全球皆然。 二、为何不采纳?因为采纳就动摇了“特权稳定态” 1. 听进去,意味着承认结构错误 政府若采纳一个来自底层民众的方案,就等于承认: 而这是特权系统最不能容忍的。 2. 听进去,就可能改变资源流向 大多数有益于人民的建议,都会要求: 而这些建议,恰恰是权贵们不愿让步的底线。 三、全球案例:改善人民生活的建议是如何被系统性无视的? 以下这些真实案例,来自不同文化、制度与国家,却揭示了同一现象:当权力只为少数人服务,人民就被排除在政策之外。 案例一:美国——枪支管控立法40年被拒 美国每年死于枪支的平民超4万人,但所有主张严格枪支管控的提案都被“国会山”拒绝。 为什么? 人民的安全呼吁,始终输给了特权集团的既得利益。 案例二:印度——农民抗议三法案,政府长年拒听 2020年起,印度数十万农民反对农业自由化法案,他们明确指出: 政府不但无视长达一年以上的抗议,甚至使用暴力清场、断水断网。 直到民众封堵首都数月,才勉强废除部分法案——但补偿、修复无从谈起。 这是典型的:不听、不看、不改,直到被强压才让步。 案例三:法国——养老金改革逆民意强推 2023年,法国政府绕过议会,强行推行延迟退休年龄的养老金改革,理由是“确保财政可持续”。 但: 在以“民主模范”著称的法国,权力依然优先保障资本稳定,而非人民意愿。 √案例四:巴西——亚马逊森林的原住民求救从未被听见 几十年来,巴西原住民多次呼吁政府限制对亚马逊雨林的采伐: 政府多次公开承诺环保,但私下通过“合法伪装”的开采许可、淡化处罚、甚至动用军队保护公司。 人民的生态呼声,敌不过外资和大宗商品出口创汇的短期诱惑。 案例五:菲律宾——贫民改善建议被视为“反政府言论” 菲律宾马尼拉贫民区的社区组织长期呼吁: 这些建议并非激进,但常常被政府指为“动摇国家稳定”,甚至有NGO被列为“潜在颠覆势力”。 在一个民主政体下,穷人提出的合理改善建议,成了维稳打击对象。 四、制度深层结构:为什么他们根本“用不着听人民”? 1. 政治权力早已被资本利益网络“俘获” 很多国家的政治系统,表面上是民主体制,实质上早被财团、跨国公司、金融资本捆绑。 2. 行政体系已形成“回应权贵优先”的惯性 于是政策一变再变,但人民的生活从不在“考虑范围”内。 五、提出好建议,其实是在“自我暴露” 很多国家的基层NGO、学者、社群行动者,就是因为“建议太好、道理太清晰”,而被边缘、被误导、甚至被打压。 因为提案者的专业与理性,反而证明了他们的冷漠。 六、不是不懂改善办法,而是不打算创造“公平社会” 他们不是没有能力改革,而是: 一个服务少数人的制度,是不可能产生大多数人受益的政策的。 哪怕提出千条妙策,只会被政权当作“应付危机的素材”,用完即弃。 […]

read more

Related Content

Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
In today’s world, where information is overwhelming, it’s easy to feel lost and confused. We’re all trying to find our way, looking to understand ourselves, others, and the world around us. But this process isn’t something that happens overnight. Instead, it takes a lot of time and reflection. In this column, we will share conversations […]
Shaping Children’s Mindset: The Power of Love and Experiences
Shaping Children’s Mindset: The Power of Love and Experiences
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
A child’s growth is not merely about physical development. It’s more about the extension and growth of their thinking and perception. When it comes to education, we often focus on accumulating knowledge and help children develop concrete and abstract thinking skills to better study knowledge. However, gaining knowledge is not the whole picture of cognitive […]
Learning and Career Success
Learning and Career Success
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 2, 2024
Education has traditionally been seen as a gateway to job opportunities, but it falls short in today's fast-changing world. In the modern workforce, employment is a platform for continuous learning and professional development, offering hands-on experience, problem-solving, collaboration, and opportunities for growth and innovation.
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 3, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
View All Content