Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

過去を手放してこそ、再生は始まる

過去を手放してこそ、再生は始まる

Kishou · Feb 20, 2025

「昨日はすでに歴史となり、明日は依然として未知である。ただ今日という日だけが、天からの授かりものである」 人生という旅路において、過去を振り返ることはよくある行為です。多くの人々は、記憶の奥深くに留まり、過去の輝きや後悔の中に浸ることに慣れてしまっています。しかしながら、過去を振り返ることは、自分自身をそこに縛り付けることを意味するのではありません。私たちが過去を振り返るのは、そこから得た教訓や啓示をよりはっきりと見るためであり、過去の影が現在と未来を覆い続けるのを許すためではない、という点にあります。 過去を振り返るのは、物事を明らかにするため。過去を置き去りにするのは、明晰になるためです。過去に対する内省を通じてのみ、私たちはかつての過ちから教訓を汲み取り、かつての成功から経験を抽出し、自らの未来のためにより明確な道を敷くことができるのです。 しかし、内省とは、過去に長時間留まることではありません。知恵と洞察力をもって、すでに過ぎ去ったものへの囚われを手放すことを学び、そうして初めて、未来の挑戦と機会を迎え入れることが可能になるのです。 一、過去の経験は、私たちが成長するための豊かな土壌である 過去は、私たちが変えることのできない歴史ですが、私たちの人生に深遠な影響を与えています。一つひとつの過ち、一つひとつの失敗、一つひとつの選択が、目に見えない形で今日の私たちを形作っているのです。それらは、私たちの思考に豊かな養分を供給し、私たちの行動に必要な内省の機会を提供してくれます。 しかし、内省とは、ひたすら自分を責めたり、誰かを恨んだりすることではありません。経験から教訓を学び、同じ過ちを繰り返すのを避けることです。かつて失敗した決断は、今後の選択において、私たちをより慎重にさせてくれるかもしれません。かつて受けた傷は、私たちをより強靭にしてくれるかもしれません。 このプロセスにおいて、過去は重荷ではなく、一種の財産です。それは、私たちが一つひとつの決断と行動において、より賢明な選択をするのを助けてくれるのです。 二、過去に留まることは、未来を束縛することである 過去の経験が重要な意味を持つとはいえ、もし私たちが常に過去に留まっていれば、自らの思い出によって縛られてしまうでしょう。この状況は、ずっと鏡の中の自分を見つめているうちに、目の前の美しい風景を見逃してしまうのに似ています。私たちがすでに消え去った時間を振り返り続けている時、私たちの目は前方の道を見ることができません。その時、私たちの心もまた、過去の憂いや喜びに悩まされ、今この瞬間の生活に全身全霊で打ち込むことができなくなります。 哲学者のハイデガーが述べたように、「人間は未来に向かって存在する」のです。私たちは未来に目を向け、その視線を過去から、まだ訪れていない日々へと移すべきです。過去の足枷を手放して初めて、私たちは真の自由を手にし、自らの理想の未来を創造することができるのです。 もし私たちがずっと過去に留まっていれば、現在の素晴らしさを体験することも、未来の到来に備えることもできません。 三、いかにして過去を置き去りにし、明晰な未来へと歩むか 「過去を置き去りにする」とは、忘れることを意味するのではありません。それは、心のレベルで、もはや過去の出来事に自らの感情や選択を支配させない、ということです。過去を手放すことは、内面的な解放であり、苦しみの影の中に、光を見出すことです。 まず、私たちは自分自身と他人を許すことを学ばなければなりません。人生において、過ちを犯したり、他人から傷つけられたりすることは、避けられません。過去の過ちや傷に過度にとらわれ続けることは、私たちをさらに重くするだけだと、正しく理解する必要があります。許し、手放す中で、私たちは真の自由と、思考の次元を高める機会を得るのです。 次に、私たちは今この瞬間に、積極的に自らの未来を築く必要があります。未来の可能性は無限です。私たちにできるのは、現在の自分を磨くことに集中し、自分を変えることができる機会を有効に掴むことです。一つひとつの学び、一つひとつの進歩、一つひとつの繰り返しが、未来へと向かう一歩となるのです。 最後に、人生には壮大な目標が必要です。そうして初めて、生命は価値あるものとして輝きます。私たちは、ただ頭数を揃えるために、この世に来たのではありません。壮大な目標は、私たちが前進するための原動力であり、過去の暗雲から抜け出すための光です。 どれほど困難であっても、夢と目標に自らの歩みを導かせなければなりません。目標を追いかける過程で、私たちは、過去の様々な悩みが次第に色褪せ、未来への希望がますます鮮明になり、一日一日をより着実に、そして豊かに生きている自分に気づくでしょう。 結語 過去を振り返るのは、物事を明らかにするため。過去を手放すのは、明晰になるためです。過去がどのようなものであったとしても、私たちはそこから教訓を学び、それを前へ進む力へと転換させるべきであり、歩みを引き止める足枷にしてはなりません。 一人ひとりの人生は、絶えず前進し続ける旅です。過去は足元の礎であり、未来は前方の山頂です。過去の荷物を絶えず手放していくことによってのみ、未来への道のりを、より遠くまで歩んでいくことができるのです。

التخلي عن الماضي يُعد شرارة الانطلاق

التخلي عن الماضي يُعد شرارة الانطلاق

Kishou · Feb 20, 2025

الأمس تاريخ، والغد لغز، واليوم هدية مع تقدمنا في الحياة، يصبح من الطبيعي أن نُمعن النظر إلى الوراء. كثير من الناس يظلون متمسكين بذكرياتهم، سواء بالاحتفاظ بنجاحات الماضي أو بالغرق في الندم. لكن التأمل في الماضي لا يعني الوقوف عنده؛ فالهدف الحقيقي هو التعلم من تجاربنا واكتساب الحكمة، لا السماح للماضي بتثبيتنا عن العيش في […]

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content