Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

丧失或放弃公民权力:对个体、家庭、社会及人类文明的影响

Yicheng · Jan 26, 2025

公民权力不仅是个体在国家中的合法身份象征,更是一种确保个体尊严和社会资源公平分配的重要机制。它包括参与社会治理、享受公共服务、受法律保护等权利,同时伴随着履行社会义务的责任。然而,现实中,有些人因自愿放弃公民权力,或因特殊原因失去公民权力,这种选择或境遇对他们自身、家庭、社会乃至人类文明的发展都有深远的影响与危害。 一、对个体的影响与危害:被剥离的身份与脆弱的生存状态 1. 身份认同的危机 放弃或失去公民权力,个体将失去与国家、社会的正式连接。这种身份上的缺失会引发深层次的心理和社会问题。 联合国难民署报告显示,全球有超过450万人处于无国籍状态。这些人由于缺乏正式身份,无法申请护照、参加选举或获得社会服务,生活在极端不稳定的状态中。失去身份的孤独感和无助感让他们与社会渐行渐远,甚至陷入精神崩溃的边缘。 2. 基本权利的剥夺 公民权力是获得教育、医疗、就业等基本权利的基础。失去这些权力,个体的生存环境将极度恶化。 根据皮尤研究中心的数据,美国约有1100万非法移民,他们因缺乏公民身份,无法合法工作或享受医保福利,许多人只能从事低薪、高危的工作,且在受到歧视或剥削时缺乏法律保护。 这样的例子在全球都很常见。缺乏公民身份常常导致连基本的生活保障都丧失,同时被主流社会边缘化。 3. 心理健康的隐患 长期的身份缺失与社会孤立会导致个体产生自卑、抑郁等心理问题。 一个典型的例子是,日本有超过100万人选择完全脱离社会,不再履行任何公民义务,过着与世隔绝的生活。他们往往因对社会失望而自我放逐,陷入深度孤独,许多人甚至最终选择自杀。 二、对家庭的影响与危害:经济负担与代际遗传的困境 1. 经济负担的加重 当家庭成员失去公民权力或选择放弃履行社会义务时,他们的基本需求如医疗、住房等往往需要由其他家庭成员承担,导致整个家庭的经济压力增加。 例如,在土耳其、黎巴嫩等地,大量叙利亚难民家庭因无国籍而无法享受医疗与教育服务。由于这些国家缺少充足的资源支持,许多难民家庭只能寄居在简陋的营地,孩子们失去了上学的机会。同时,父母为了维持生计,也不得不让子女辍学打工,形成恶性循环。 2. 家庭关系的破裂 公民权力的缺失还可能引发家庭内部的价值观冲突,甚至导致家庭成员之间的疏远。 比如在欧洲,有些穆斯林家庭的年轻人,尤其是二代移民,受到极端宗教思想的影响,拒绝参与民主选举,反对世俗法律,甚至加入了ISIS等极端组织。这不仅破坏了家庭内部的和谐,也使得整个家庭在当地社会中被孤立。 3. 代际困境的延续 父母身份的缺失往往会直接影响子女的未来发展。例如,非法移民子女可能因为没有合法身份而无法接受良好的教育,从而难以摆脱贫困。 许多非法移民的子女被称为“追梦者”(Dreamers),他们因父母身份问题无法获得合法的居留权,尽管在美国出生或长大,却面临被驱逐的威胁。 三、对社会的影响与危害:资源分配失衡与社会信任危机 1. 社会资源分配的不公 当一部分人失去或放弃公民权力,他们的需求与负担往往仍由社会承担。这种情况会引发资源分配的不平衡,激化社会矛盾。 2015年欧洲移民潮中,德国、意大利等国家面对大量涌入的无身份移民,社会福利系统不堪重负。德国政府不得不紧急调集资金和资源,加快建设临时收容中心,但仍难以及时提供住房、医疗、语言培训等基本服务。 本地居民感到社会秩序受到冲击,对移民的福利占用感到不满,民粹主义与排外情绪随之抬头。许多人担心大量难民涌入会加重社会福利负担,挤占本地人的就业和教育资源。 2. 社会凝聚力的削弱 公民权力的缺失会导致部分人群无法参与社会治理,社会整体凝聚力因此下降。 在日本,近年来年轻人的投票率持续偏低,甚至低于50%。比如在2022年的众议院选举中,18-29岁年龄段的投票率仅为46%,而65岁及以上老年人的投票率则高达71%。 这种严重的代际投票差距,导致政策制定明显偏离年轻人的需求。例如,日本政府近年来大幅增加了养老金支出和医疗福利,而对青年就业、教育、住房等领域的投入相对不足。一些年轻人甚至抱怨,他们缴纳的税金主要用于养老,而自己的利益得不到重视。 3. 犯罪率与社会不稳定的上升 缺乏公民权力的人群因经济困境和边缘化,可能更容易走向犯罪或极端主义。举个例子,法国郊区的移民群体因长期被边缘化,无法融入主流社会,部分年轻人因此参与了暴力抗议或犯罪活动,社会治安问题日益突出。 四、对人类文明发展的影响:民主与公平的倒退 1. 民主制度的削弱 当部分人自愿或被迫退出公共事务,民主的代表性和合法性将被削弱。 在美国,由于各种社会经济因素,低收入和少数族裔群体的投票率通常低于高收入和白人群体。这导致他们在政治决策中的代表性相对较弱,不同群体的利益可能无法得到平等的反映。 而在印度,由于文化传统和偏见,妇女常常被排斥在公共参与之外,进入公共事务决策系统的女性非常少,导致了女性的需求不被听见,政策和法律的制定也更偏向于男性,这对印度女性的处境极其不利。 2. 公平与包容的倒退 公民权力的丧失使得弱势群体更加边缘化,从而阻碍社会的公平与包容性发展。 据联合国数据显示,全球无国籍儿童中有一半以上无法接受基础教育,严重制约了他们未来的可能性。这不仅是个体的不幸,也是人类潜力和人力资源的巨大浪费。 3. 文明进程的停滞与风险 公民权力是推动文明发展的重要力量,当越来越多的人选择退出或被排除在外,社会的创新力和进步动力将被削弱。 […]

5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity

5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity

Daohe · Jan 24, 2025

The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]

read more

Related Content

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content