Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?

Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?

Yicheng · Jan 23, 2025

Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but […]

宗教为何失灵?现代人不再需要信仰吗?

宗教为何失灵?现代人不再需要信仰吗?

Yicheng · Jan 23, 2025

宗教在人类历史长河中曾是社会的重要基石,它为人类的精神信仰、道德规范以及社会秩序提供了根本支持。然而,随着现代文明的快速发展,宗教显得愈发落后、僵化,无法适应新的时代需求。这种滞后性不仅让人们感到无法适从,还导致宗教的逐步边缘化,甚至被抛弃。 本文将从教义、组织结构、社会功能以及精神需求四个层面深入探讨宗教的落后及其影响,并反思宗教未来发展的可能性。 一、教义的僵化:无法回应现代人的问题 宗教教义是其核心所在,但许多宗教教义因其诞生于数千年前的社会背景,难以应对现代社会的复杂问题。并非现代人不需要信仰,而是宗教实践的落后,导致了现代人们对宗教的排斥和无感。 1. 过时的教义 传统宗教的许多教义源于古代社会,当时的生产力、科学水平及社会结构决定了宗教对世界的解释具有局限性。例如,许多宗教经典中对宇宙起源、自然现象及生命意义的解读,在科学的验证下显得缺乏说服力。随着现代人对宇宙和生命的认知不断深化,这些教义因无法与科学共融而变得苍白无力,甚至引起反感。 2. 缺乏动态诠释的能力 宗教教义的僵化不仅表现在其内容的过时,也表现在其对教义的解释方式缺乏灵活性。许多宗教领袖与组织固守传统解释,拒绝结合当代文化、科技和哲学对教义进行重新诠释,致使宗教无法为现代人提供切实的精神指引。 3. 忽视人类的复杂性 现代社会的人类需求已不再局限于物质与简单的灵魂慰藉,而是需要对个人价值、自由选择、多元文化的深刻理解。然而,一些宗教教义仍然以二元对立的视角(如善恶、救赎与堕落)审视人类行为,无法涵盖人性的复杂面向。这种简单化的教义体系越来越难以吸引人们,尤其是那些受过良好教育、注重独立思考的年轻人。 二、组织结构的封闭与保守:宗教权威的失灵 除了教义本身的僵化,宗教组织的封闭与保守也是其落后性的核心表现之一。 1. 权力集中与腐败 宗教组织内部的权力过度集中,常常导致不透明的管理结构,甚至滋生腐败现象。例如,某些宗教领袖利用信徒的信任谋取私利,或者掩盖内部丑闻以维持权威。这种行为让人们对宗教的神圣性与正当性产生质疑,最终选择远离宗教。 2. 等级制度与排他性 许多宗教组织维持着严格的等级制度,强调服从与权威。这种结构使得宗教缺乏对信徒个体需求的关注,甚至压制了信徒的独立思考。同时,某些宗教组织对外表现出强烈的排他性,拒绝与其他信仰、文化或思想体系合作与对话。这种狭隘的态度在全球化、多元化的时代显得格格不入。 3. 形式主义的泛滥 宗教组织内部往往更注重仪式与教规的形式化,而忽视了信徒的真实精神需求。例如,繁琐的宗教仪式可能成为信徒的负担,而非灵魂的滋养。形式主义的泛滥让宗教逐渐失去其内在的吸引力,变得空洞无物。 三、社会功能的弱化:未能回应当代议题 宗教在历史上曾是人们寻找意义的支撑,但在现代社会中,其社会功能显得日益弱化,甚至在关键领域缺位。 1. 对全球性问题的漠视 面对诸如气候变化、贫富差距、移民危机、性别不平等等全球性问题,宗教本应发挥道德引领的作用。然而,许多宗教组织表现出保守、狭隘的态度,缺乏推动全球合作与社会责任的积极性。这种漠视削弱了宗教的社会影响力,甚至让宗教成为分化的源头。 2. 忽视心理健康与精神需求 许多传统宗教在应对现代社会的问题时显得力不从心。这些宗教体系大多是建立在几百年前的社会背景下,而现代社会的心理问题,如焦虑、压力、孤独等,远远超出了宗教历史上所应对的范畴。 虽然宗教教义中有许多关于爱与宽容的理念,但它们往往缺乏具体的实践指导,特别是如何在现代社会中面对日常生活的挑战。很多时候,信徒听到的只是在道德层面的劝诫,而缺少针对具体情境的心理疏导和成长支持。宗教组织往往停留在空洞的布道与劝诫中,无法满足人们的深层次精神需求。 3. 与进步价值的冲突 宗教的落后还体现在其对现代价值观的抗拒上。例如,某些宗教持续反对性别平等、 LGBTQ+ 权益等社会进步议题,甚至站在科学与人权的对立面。这种对现代价值的敌视进一步削弱了宗教的吸引力,特别是对于年轻一代而言,宗教成为落后的代名词。 四、精神探索的分化:宗教的疏离与替代 当宗教无法适应时代,人们对意义与幸福的追寻并未停止,而是转向了其他领域: 1. 科学与哲学的兴起 科学和哲学在提供宇宙、生命以及人类行为的解释上,展现出了极大的魅力。许多人逐渐相信,通过科学探索与哲学思辨,可以超越传统宗教对世界的解释,找到更加可靠的答案。 2. 心理学与灵修的普及 心理学、灵修等现代实践为人们提供了更为个性化、实际有效的精神成长途径。无论是冥想、正念还是积极心理学,这些方法更贴近现代人的需求,逐渐成为宗教的替代品。 3. 人本主义与多元价值观的崛起 人本主义提倡以人为中心,而非以神为中心,强调每个人都可以通过自己的努力实现幸福与价值。这种观念与多元文化的包容性,使得人们能够接受多样的精神实践,而不再拘泥于单一的宗教体系。 五、反思宗教的未来:进步的可能性 宗教的落后并非不可逆转。若宗教能够反思自身的问题,并与现代社会接轨,仍然有可能重新焕发光彩: 1. 动态解读教义 宗教需要在尊重传统的同时,对教义进行符合时代需求的重新解释,让这些经典思想保持其生命力,同时与现代人更加紧密地对接。现代化的宗教解释能够引导信徒深入探索自我,学会处理情感冲突、孤独、压力等内心问题,帮助他们实现个人的精神成长。 宗教不仅是个人信仰的表现,更是社会凝聚力、文化认同和精神支持的重要来源。通过社会学的视角,宗教可以为信徒提供更多的社会服务和情感支持,而不仅仅是道德上的教化。 […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
View All Content