Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

经济繁荣可以依靠政府吗?

Kishou · Jan 22, 2025

当谈到经济调控和减少贫富差距时,很多人会将责任归结到政府身上。政府作为宏观调控的核心主体,确实通过一系列政策和措施在推动经济平衡方面发挥着重要作用。然而,这种依赖是否足够?是否能够真正实现长久的经济繁荣?这一问题值得我们深入探讨。 政府调控的现状与挑战 各国政府长期以来通过税收、财政政策和法律法规来实现经济调控。例如,日本实施的 法人税(Corporate Tax)就是一种直接针对企业盈利能力的税收手段,旨在从富裕的企业中提取资源,再分配给社会中需要支持的领域。类似地,美国也通过 累进所得税 制度,让高收入群体承担更多税负,为社会底层提供更多公共服务。 尽管这些政策在理论上看似完善,但在实际执行中面临诸多挑战: 效率低下与浪费:政府能力的边界 不仅仅是税收分配效率的问题,政府在经济调控中的低效表现也愈发受到关注。 此外,美国在2008年金融危机后推出的大规模量化宽松政策,虽然在短期内稳定了经济,却也被批评为推高了资产价格,加剧了贫富差距。 政府能力的局限性:日本与欧美的案例 历史上,政府经济调控中的局限性屡见不鲜。以日本为例,广场协定的签订导致日元迅速升值,从而触发了经济泡沫的形成与破裂。之后的“失落的三十年”,证明了过度依赖政府调控的局限性。 在欧美国家,类似的问题也并不少见。例如,欧元区在2008年金融危机后的主权债务危机中,一些国家被迫接受严厉的财政紧缩政策。这种政府调控带来的短期稳定,却引发了长期的经济增长乏力,尤其是希腊、西班牙等国的高失业率问题。 经济繁荣需要新的思路 面对政府调控的种种挑战,我们需要重新思考一个问题:经济繁荣是否只能依靠政府?我们一乘公益的答案是 不,政府调控固然重要,但远远不够。 未来的经济繁荣需要政府、企业、个人和社会组织的共同参与。这种多元化的参与机制,意味着以下几点: 以社会为主导的经济调控可能性 如果社会组织和企业逐渐参与到经济调控中,我们可以预见以下可能: 如何实现这样的转变? 当然,这一转变需要长时间的探索与实践。对于没有庞大资本的个人来说,如何避免被巨头资本压制?这一问题的答案,可能在新的金融形式中找到。 社会公民金融 是我们一乘公益提出的未来经济模式之一。在这种模式下,人人都可以通过去中心化的方式参与到经济调控中,并真正享受经济繁荣带来的红利。 如果您对此感兴趣,可以阅读我们关于“社会公民金融”的专题文章,我们将持续展开这一话题,为您展现新时代经济繁荣的可能性。

How capitalism’s financial system intensifies class immobility

Kishou · Jan 20, 2025

Modern finance is rife with inequality. Ordinary individuals are left at an informational and resource disadvantage, increasing their financial risks in investment. In contrast, capitalists exploit insider knowledge and market control to generate massive gains, widening the gap in wealth and solidifying class divides. Urgent reforms are necessary to curb these injustices.

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
View All Content