Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

靈魂覺醒的三個階段

Daohe · Jan 19, 2025

靈魂的覺醒是每個人內心深處最深切的探索之旅,是從迷茫到清明,從束縛到自由的過程。這個過程並非一蹴而就,而是一個逐步深入、層層展開的自我覺察與超越的過程。本文將靈魂的覺醒劃分為三個階段,每個階段都是一個深刻的認知轉變,讓我們走向更加自由的旅程,深入洞察自我與世界。 第一次覺醒:超越自我,洞察本我 靈魂的第一次覺醒是一種全新的體驗。如同嬰兒初次睜開眼睛,人開始真正意義上地看清楚這個世界,也隨之看清楚自己。這種覺醒的前兆是一些特殊的經歷,啟發人去思考自己存在的意義。但認知上的突破往往不是漸進的,而是突然發生的,像一束閃耀的光芒,瞬間引發了思想的劇變。 此時,人開始意識到,自己的自我認知是如何被外部因素所塑造的——比如社會的期待、家庭的傳統和文化的規範。這些曾經看似理所當然的外部構建,開始呈現其真正的本質——暫時、隨意、甚至是無厘頭的。由此覺悟,人們才能擺脫對這些外在因素的依賴,意識到真正的自我遠遠超越了一切表象。 這一覺醒讓人意識到生而為人這件事的本質,擁抱自己最真實的人性,了解自己的靈魂真面目。同時,個體幾乎不可避免地會經歷掙扎與失落,因為自己賴以為生的身份基礎被動搖了。曾經帶來安慰的熟悉角色、關係和信仰,也開始變得不再牢固,取而代之的是一種暴露於天地之間的脆弱感。 然而,正是透過這樣重量級的覺悟,一個人才可能脫離對外在因素的依賴,意識到真正的自我是超越一切表象的存在,看清楚自己和世界的真相,釋放出內在的潛力,體驗什麼是清明地真正地活著。 第二次覺醒:洞察世界,探索使命 在第一次覺醒的基礎上,站在更廣闊的視野上審視自我後,靈魂將進入了第二次覺醒的階段。在這一階段,覺醒不再侷限於個人的內心世界,而是擴展到對整個世界的重新認知。我們不僅僅是在個人精神與靈魂的層面上探索意義,更在更宏觀的層面上思考世界的構成:社會的結構、文化的意義,以及個人與這些外部因素之間錯綜複雜的關係。 此時,人看待世界的眼光變得純粹而清新。他開始思考:我是誰?我為何而存在?我們的生命對這個浩瀚宇宙、對社會、對人類文明究竟意味著什麼?這些問題不再是空泛的哲學探討,而是滲透進日常生活的深刻思考。人會開始明白,自己的生命不僅僅是短暫的個體存在,它更是歷史洪流中的一部分,是文化傳承的重要載體。 第二次覺醒不再是單純的自我解放,它是對整個世界的深刻洞察,是對自己與世界關係的更全面理解。這種覺醒讓我們看清楚自己在龐大的社會系統和文化體系中的角色。這種覺醒標誌著個體超越了社會文化對「人」的調剂與塑造,成為了一個真正的人。人開始探索自己的使命,並意識到,這個使命並非外界強加的,而是從內心深處自然流露的。由此,人會真正愛上生活本身,愛上賴以生存的家園。 第三次覺醒:重新定位,改造世界 第三次覺醒,是靈魂覺醒的最深層次,也是最具創造性的階段。這一階段標誌著個體在徹底認清自己與世界關係之後,主動地重新定義自己的身份、關係,甚至整個生活環境。這是一種來自內心深處的召喚,驅使人依據靈魂的真正目標,去創造、去改變,去以全新的方式重新塑造自我和周圍的世界。 第三次覺醒帶來的是深刻的責任感與使命感。這一階段的覺醒,超越了個人層面的自我實現,人開始考慮如何為社會、為人類共同體貢獻力量。通過重新審視和定位自己的身份與社會關係,個體不再是單純的社會參與者,而是成為了世界的創造者與改造者。靈魂的覺醒因此進入了一個全新的維度,個體不僅僅是生活的體驗者,還是生活的創造者。 這一覺醒意味著個體開始主動承擔起推動世界變化的責任。他們不再侷限於自我滿足,而是力求以行動去塑造自己理想中的世界,無論是通過職業、藝術創作、社會服務,還是通過日常生活中的選擇與決策。個體開始意識到,自己的每一份努力都可能成為推動社會進步的力量,自己的每一個改變都可能引領他人走向更高的覺悟。 這一過程並非一蹴而就,而是一個持續不斷的創造與重塑過程。它要求個體具備更高的覺知、深刻的內省,以及堅韌的行動力。在這一過程中,個體不僅僅是在改變世界,更是在經歷一種靈魂的昇華,邁向一種更為宏大和廣闊的存在方式。這是靈魂最具創造力的覺醒,它不僅為個體帶來了深遠的轉變,也為社會和整個世界注入了新的活力與希望。 總結 靈魂的覺醒是一個從自我認知到社會參與,再到世界創造的漸進過程。每一個階段的覺醒都是深刻的轉變,帶領個體從局限走向自由,從困惑走向清晰,從束縛走向力量。最終,靈魂的覺醒不僅讓個體看清自己的內心深處,也讓他們意識到自己的使命,進而在世界中找到自己的位置,推動社會與文化的進步。

The three stages of spiritual awakening

Daohe · Jan 19, 2025

The awakening of the soul is the deepest journey of exploration within each individual, a path from confusion to clarity, from constraint to freedom. It is not a sudden leap but a gradual, layered unfolding of self-awareness and transcendence. This process can be divided into three stages, each representing a profound shift in perception, guiding […]

read more

Related Content

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content