Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

The Property Divide: Women’s Rights and the Fight for Equality in the Family

Daohe · Jan 5, 2025

Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent): In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting. Many parents, despite having money, […]

从家庭财产分配看女性权利的现代觉醒

Daohe · Jan 5, 2025

最近我看到一位朋友在社交网站上发布了如下内容(发布已征得本人同意): 许多独生女,虽然看似是家里唯一的继承人,但与儿子相比从来没有被当成家里的继承人培养。 很多父母明明有钱,但是一提到给女儿买房、留学的时候,钱袋子就捂紧了。家里的财产状况、财务规划也从来不跟女儿讨论。更何况,女性从小背上了精神牌坊,要视金钱如粪土,要追求情怀、为爱发电。 长此以往,金钱的能量根本没办法走到女性这里,权力是没有的,牌坊和责任倒是背了不老少。 我自认是一个更追求智识生活、理想主义的人,成为佛教徒后好像宗教也更期待我去做一个利他的、轻视物质的人。但,理想主义者更需要有钱来把梦想变真,不是吗?多么痛的领悟啊! 我后来才发现,在原始佛教的经典里,佛陀对在家弟子的教导是非常侧重物质的(毕竟他是金牛座)。 他认为在家弟子要想得到现世安乐,就必须跟钱搞好关系,这方面他是非常务实的。“所有钱谷,方便所得…..能极守护,不令王、贼、水、火劫夺漂没令失,不善守护者亡失。”可见保护好自己的财产是很重要的修行功课。 只是对于女性而言,要卸下那个负担,看到应当属于自己的财产权利到底有哪些。 对文章中提到的女性权利问题,一乘公益内部进行了思考和讨论,以下是我们对此问题的解读与解决方案。 1. 女性的财富失权是结构性问题 这文章提到的现象是一种极具代表性的社会问题,它揭示了女性在家庭和社会结构中的特殊困境。许多独生女,尽管表面上是家族财产唯一的继承人,却因为传统观念而未被当作真正的继承者培养。这种现象不仅延续了土地封建社会中的性别偏见,还在现代社会中通过文化、教育和社会习惯被不断强化。 尤其值得关注的是,女性常被教育要轻视金钱、崇尚精神追求,甚至为情怀和利他主义“无私奉献”。这一文化上的“精神牌坊”,让女性在金钱关系中始终处于弱势地位:既难以主动争取应得的财产权利,也缺乏保护自己资源的意识。这种现象不仅剥夺了女性在家庭中的资源分配权,更限制了她们在社会中实现经济独立与梦想的可能性。 这背后潜藏着一个深刻的文明问题:当社会对女性施加过多的道德责任,却不提供对等的资源支持时,女性的权利不仅得不到保护,连基本的尊重都难以实现。 2. 性别不平等是文明低下的体现 这种现象的根源在于文明素质和社会文化的发展水平。在封建社会中,家族财产的传承以男性为主,因为男性被视为家族的延续者,而女性则被赋予支持和服务的角色。这种性别分工的模式,随着工业社会的到来开始松动,但在许多家庭中仍然根深蒂固。 现代社会的公民文化强调个体的权利和平等,尤其是在资源分配上,性别不应成为限制的条件。当社会进入公民文化的成熟阶段时,性别平等将成为一种“默认的常识”。女性不再需要通过隐忍和妥协来争取自己的权利,而是被自然地视为与男性平等的财产权主体。如果这种性别偏见仍然存在,反而是一种文明的倒退。全人类都需要警惕这种倒退。 现代社会的进步不仅仅表现在经济发展和技术创新上,更体现在对公平和正义的追求。这种追求要求我们重新审视财富分配中的性别问题,摒弃传统观念,为女性争取应有的权利,促使人类文明更加进步。 3. 佛法处理现代女性问题的局限性 文章中提到作者通过佛教寻找关于财富分配的指导,这其实反映了一种对精神寄托的需求。然而,佛教传统中对财富的态度并非一味的否定。在原始佛教的教义中,佛陀明确教导在家弟子要学会管理和保护财产。 作为在家修行者,妥善处理财产不仅是对自身责任的履行,更是维持现世安乐的必要条件。佛陀的这一务实观念在今天具有重要的启示意义:财富管理并非与精神追求对立,而是生活的一部分,是实现个人成长与社会责任的基础。 然而,文章中的女性作者显然发现,佛法在处理财富管理时,存在与现代文明需求之间的局限性。这并非因为佛教的教义缺乏智慧,而是因为佛陀传法时的社会基础与现代文明社会大相径庭,因此传统教义无法适应现代女性在经济权利上的觉醒需求。这种问题在其他宗教上也多有体现。 现代女性需要的不只是如何守护财产,更需要一种明确的系统支持和文化支持,帮助她们争取属于自己的财富权利和经济独立地位。 4. “三教归源”:实现性别平等的道路 “三教归源”的思想,融合了多家的智慧,为解决现代社会的复杂问题提供了全新的框架。在财富与性别权利的问题上,“三教归源”倡导了一种更平衡、更系统的文明观与幸福观: 财富分配中的性别不平等,往往源于文化习惯和观念上的偏见。“通”强调,通过沟通和教育,促使家庭成员、社会机构重新审视传统中的性别分工。只有理解女性争取财产权利的必要性和合理性,才能为解决问题打下基础。 在“三教归源”的框架下,财富的意义不仅是物质资源,更是权利的象征。家庭和社会需要实现性别间权利的平等,让女性在财产继承、资源分配中拥有与男性同等的地位。只有权利平等,女性才能真正承担起社会角色,实现自我价值。 “汇”不仅仅是个人权利的实现,更是将这些权利融入更大的社会发展图景中。从财富分配到文明与幸福建设,女性的参与和贡献不可或缺。只有将女性权利的觉醒融入文明的整体框架,社会才能走向真正的和谐与进步。 5. 女性权利觉醒:从争取财产权到文明的共同塑造 女性争取财产权,不仅仅是个人问题,更关乎社会文明的走向。财富本质上是一种资源,而资源的分配往往决定着社会关系的权力格局。在过去,女性在财富中的缺席,使得她们被边缘化;在今天,女性的财产权觉醒,则是重塑社会公平的重要一步。 从家庭的财富管理,到社会的性别平等,女性需要突破传统观念的束缚,用行动争取资源掌控权。同时,社会也需要通过制度保障、文化倡导,为女性提供公平的环境。 “三教归源”以人类幸福为核心,通过对财富、精神与文明的整合,为女性争取平等权利提供了一条重要的路径。财富与幸福并非对立,女性只有在拥有物质基础的前提下,才能真正实现自我价值的彰显与理想的实现。 6. 结语:从家庭到社会,迈向更文明的未来 金钱与权利,是社会关系中不可回避的核心议题。女性的财产权问题,是传统观念与现代文明碰撞的结果,也是社会进步中的必然挑战。我们必须承认,财富的公平分配不仅关乎个体幸福,更是社会公平与和谐的基石。 “三教归源”提供了超越宗教与文化的整合视角,提醒我们:文明的发展,不仅需要科技的进步,更需要价值观的提升。女性作为人类的一半人口,其权利的觉醒与实现,正是人类整体幸福提升的必然要求。 未来,当每一位女性都能平等地享有家庭和社会中的财富与权利,真正的文明社会才会到来。这个未来,既是女性的觉醒之路,也是整个人类的共同幸福之路。

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
View All Content