Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

3 Awakening Of The Soul Pursuit To Happiness

Master Wonder · Dec 25, 2024

The moment the soul awakens, it is like humanity seeing the world for the first time — so vivid and clear that the thought of returning to ignorance and suffering is unbearable. Origin of the Article: This article comes from Ms. Luo, who is seeking her awakening of the soul in pursuit of true happiness […]

灵魂的双目

Master Wonder · Dec 25, 2024

当灵魂睁开双眼的那一刻,就如同人类第一次真正看清世界,从此再也无法忍受闭上眼睛所带来的无知与痛苦。 文章缘起: 这篇文章来源于一位罗女士:她正在为自己的灵魂觉醒,谋求真正的幸福与未来。 灵魂的觉醒,是生命中最深刻的震撼之一。这一刻,超越了语言、知识和情感的边界,直达生命的本源。就像第一次离开黑暗的洞穴,迎接阳光的照耀,灵魂的双眼睁开的那一瞬间,所有曾经隐藏的真相、被遮蔽的美好以及潜藏的黑暗,都无情地涌入意识中。这不仅是一次内在的觉醒,也是对世界、对自我、对家庭、对宇宙关系的彻底反思。 这样的觉醒是福是祸呢?为什么人类一旦睁开眼睛,便再也无法忍受原先无知的状态?灵魂觉醒的意义与代价应该如何衡量呢? 哲学家笛卡尔在他的沉思中说:“我思故我在。”但真正的觉醒不仅仅是思考的开始,而是“看见”的能力觉醒。当灵魂的双眼睁开时,人会意识到自己长期以来的视角是多么局限:许多过去视为“理所当然”的事物,实际上只是人为建构的假象,经不起深究;而许多未曾注意的细节,却开始有了全新的意义。 灵魂睁眼的那一刻,也是一个人与真实的世界初次交汇的时刻。这种看见,不仅仅是对外界的观察,更是对内在的探索——我们开始看见自己真正的欲望、情绪和行为背后的种种动机。这一刻,人突然发现自己过去的视角如此局限:因为我们常常被社会、文化、家庭乃至自身的懒惰所遮蔽,而失去了对是非、善恶的正确判断。正如柏拉图在《洞穴寓言》中描述的那样,离开洞穴的旅程虽然痛苦,但却是通往真理唯一的道路。 无知的痛苦:为何觉醒后无法忍受闭上双眼? 一个人如果觉醒,就再也无法忍受闭上双眼。尚未觉醒的人们可能认为无知的状态是幸福的,我们常常听人说“傻人有傻福”,这是因为无知让人免于面对复杂的真相,避免真相带来的扎心。但这种“幸福”更像是一种假象,一种用盲目掩盖痛苦的麻木。事实是,灵魂一旦觉醒,就再也无法退回那种盲目的状态,因为与其活在虚假与麻木中,觉醒的灵魂更愿意拥抱真相,哪怕代价是短期的痛苦。 许多人在无知的状态中活得疲惫却浑然不觉,他们感到空虚,却找不到源头。当灵魂睁开双眼时,我们终于明白,这种空虚并非来自外界,而是源自对自我真实的压抑。闭眼生活的人,为了逃避内心的痛苦,往往会通过物质追求、娱乐和繁忙的生活填补空白。然而,这些手段只会让人陷入更深的迷失。 闭眼生活的人,往往把握不住时间的流逝,总认为“还有明天”,以至于荒废了今天。而灵魂觉醒的人深刻理解生命的短暂与无常,他们意识到每一刻都不可浪费,因为未来可能并不存在。这种对无常的理解,使得灵魂觉醒后的人无法再容忍将生命浪费在无意义的事情上。 觉醒的灵魂不仅会看到自我的真实,也会开始看到他人的痛苦和世界的不公。当我们意识到自己与他人息息相关,意识到自己的每个行为都会对周围产生影响时,责任感便油然而生。闭上双眼或许可以暂时避免负担,但觉醒后,我们再也无法对他人的苦难视而不见。 看清世界的代价:真相为何如此刺痛? 灵魂的觉醒是一场蜕变,但这场蜕变并非毫无代价。从黑暗进入光明的眼睛需要时间适应,我们的意识也需要时间接纳真相的重量。许多人在觉醒之初会经历灵魂的暗夜,因为光明不仅揭示了真相,也让我们直面隐藏的黑暗。 觉醒后,我们开始意识到,人性并非纯粹的善或恶,而是一种复杂的混合体,善恶皆由人创造。这样的认知让人既感到无助,也感到敬畏,因为这意味着我们既有改变世界的潜力,也有可能成为破坏的力量。 看清世界后,我们发现许多事物是需要改变的,而这些改变往往从挑战自身的舒适区开始。无论是放下既有的偏见,还是承担新的责任,这都需要极大的勇气。 觉醒后的人常常感到孤独,因为他们的视角可能与身边的人格格不入。在一片麻木的世界里,一个觉醒的灵魂很容易被视为异类,也很容易感到无法与他人链接。这种孤独感虽然痛苦,但也正是灵魂成长的重要部分。 灵魂觉醒后的蜕变:从孤独到超越 尽管觉醒伴随着痛苦,但这种痛苦并非毫无意义。觉醒后的灵魂,会经历从孤独到超越的过程。他们不仅会接受自己的局限性,还会超越自我,真正拥抱世界。 觉醒的人最终会在真相中找到平静。他们不再逃避恐惧,而是接受它;他们不再试图控制一切,而是学会与无常共舞。这种平静并非来自外界,而是内心的力量。 当我们看清了自己的痛苦,也就更容易理解他人的痛苦。觉醒的灵魂会带着爱和慈悲去对待世界,因为他们知道,所有的生命都是彼此交织的。 觉醒的人会开始追求超越个体的意义。他们的生命不再局限于个人的得失,而是扩展到对社会和世界的贡献。他们相信,灵魂的成长正是为了承担更大的使命。 结语:觉醒是一条孤独而光明的路 当灵魂睁开双眼的那一刻,我们便踏上了一条无法回头的旅程。这是一条通向真理的道路,充满挑战,但也充满希望。尽管无知的生活看似简单,但它无法带来真正的满足;尽管觉醒伴随着痛苦,但它却让生命焕发出无限的光芒。 愿我们每一个人都能有勇气睁开灵魂的双眼,直面真相,超越恐惧,走向内在的自由与外在的爱。唯有如此,生命的意义才能真正绽放。

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
View All Content