Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

What is real success?

Daohe · Oct 31, 2024

People are often obsessed with external standards of success, caught up in comparisons and competition, and view success as an end goal. However, for every human being, we are born successful. From the moment life first blooms, our life carries unique meaning and value. Regardless of wealth or status, our existence in this world is […]

什么是真正的成功?

Daohe · Oct 31, 2024

人们经常迷失在外在的成功标准中,陷入比较和竞争,把成功当成一个目标。然而,对每一个生命而言,我们本身都是成功。从生命初绽的那一刻,我们就带着独特的意义和价值而来。无论贫富贵贱,生命本身是一种存在的成就。在世间奔波追逐时,也许我们会因外界的标准感到失落,但生命的奇迹和存在的意义从未因他人而黯淡。我们站在这片大地上,每个人的存在即是价值。 对一个追求幸福的生命而言,成功是一条充满丰富风景的旅程。 这条路上,体验的过程往往比到达终点更为深刻。人们渴望幸福,追求自我实现,然而,幸福并非一朝一夕的收获,而是逐步积累的体验。在体验亲情的温暖、爱情的甜蜜、友谊的陪伴、困苦的磨练之中,我们不断成熟、不断丰盈。我们最终发现,真正的幸福并不是得到什么,而是拥有一颗能够感受的心。这种内心的富足,才是追求幸福的人生路上最大的成功。 对一个反抗压迫的生命而言,成功即是争取自由与民主。 在这条道路上,成功并不轻松,而是伴随着抗争与坚守的阵痛。对受压迫者来说,成功不是名誉与财富,而是摆脱不公、挣脱束缚,赢得尊严与平等的权利。历史上无数个体和集体的抗争,使得人类社会的自由之路不断延展。 面对压迫和不平,我们选择发声、抗争、为自己和他人争取自由。正是在这些反抗者的成功中,我们才看见了世界一点一滴地向着平等、尊重、自由的方向迈进。正如曼德拉所说,“我学会了勇敢并非无所畏惧,而是敢于超越恐惧。“在这条抗争的路上,成功即是找到那份突破恐惧的勇气。 对一个拥有公民权利的生命而言,成功是一种对社会的承诺。 当我们拥有了权利,拥有了话语权,真正的成功便不止于此。真正的成功,是将我们的力量用于改善社会的现状,用一己之力去改变身边的点滴,让社区、城市、国家,甚至世界变得更加美好。 这种成功不再是自我成就,而是对他人、对社会的一份承诺。它不再只是个体的成就感,而是为他人带来福祉的无私行动。正如甘地所说,“成为你想要看到的改变。”在为社会进步而奋斗的过程中,成功就是不断推动这个世界向更文明、更幸福的方向发展。 因此,成功是对谁而言的?是因人而异的。它不是静止不变的,而是一个动态的过程。它像一幅不断延展的历史画卷,随着每一个时代的步伐而变化。对某些人来说,成功或许是一份安稳的生活;而对另一些人而言,可能是一场深刻的自我实现、或是为他人争取幸福的行动。它不仅是个人的荣耀,更是一种时代的象征。我们要理解的是,成功没有唯一的定义,它是一个因人而异、不断发展的旅程。 你的成功态度和目标,将决定你的人生方向。 成功不是一成不变的终点,而是随着我们的理解和追求而转变的过程。有些人选择追求物质富足;而有些人选择追求精神自由、社会进步。我们对成功的定义和态度,决定了我们拥有怎样的未来。 那么,今天我们对“成功”的理解究竟是什么呢?在这个全球化和信息化的时代,成功已不再只是个人的成就,而是更多人共同的责任。今天的成功,应是实现“全体人类完整公民”的理想。完整的公民是什么?它不仅仅是国家意义上的身份,而是具有全球意识的社会公民,甚至是全球公民。他们不分地域、不分种族,将全人类的福祉和幸福视为共同的目标。 我们的“一乘公益”,正是基于这一愿景设立的。我们的成功不是个人的光辉,而是每一个个体的幸福与尊严的汇聚。我们致力于推动人类文明和社会幸福的发展,这既是我们的责任,也是我们的使命。 真正的成功,是让每一个生命在这世间,都能够享有幸福与尊严。

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content