Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

素质教育中,每个孩子都是A

Daohe · Oct 27, 2024

素质教育的兴起是教育界的重大变革,也是公民社会进步的重要标志之一。在素质教育的理念中,每个孩子都是A,这不仅仅是对他们成绩的认可,更是对他们成长过程的全面肯定。传统教育中,学生的表现通常按照“优良差”或“A、B、C”这些等级来划分,这种分层评估方式实质上是阶级社会的产物,注重对固定标准的遵循。然而,素质教育突破了这一传统,将孩子们的学习和成长视为一个多维度、无限发展的过程,倡导通过尊重个体差异,赋予每个孩子平等的地位和机会,让他们不断地拓展自己的能力与素质。 每个孩子都是A 素质教育的核心理念是每个孩子都是A,这意味着每个孩子发展潜力平等,机会平等。教育不再根据分数来为孩子贴上“优劣”的标签,而是将重点放在激发孩子的多元潜能和个性发展上。每个孩子在学习的过程中有自己独特的节奏和步伐,进步不应通过单一的成绩来衡量,而是通过他们对学习的积极态度、探索精神、综合成绩以及在多种领域中的表现来肯定。这种方式让教育更加多元化和包容性,让每一个孩子都能在不同的领域中找到属于自己的闪光点。 A后面的+号 在素质教育的框架下,A后面的“+”号不仅象征着学生在学术上的进步,还代表他们在学习过程中表现出的额外努力、积极态度和个人成长,每一个“+”都是他们在不同领域所取得进步的标志。例如,有的孩子可能在学术上表现不如其他人出色,但在艺术、体育或社会活动中却展现了独特的才能。无论孩子的“+”多或少,教育的任务就是为他们创造一个多样化的成长环境,让每个孩子都能通过自己的方式,积累属于自己的A+。 无限A+ 素质教育主张“无限A+”的理念,这意味着孩子们的学习和成长没有固定的终点,他们可以不断挑战自我,追求更高的成就。这种评价体系打破了传统的分数限制,强调学习的持续性和个体的无限潜能。无限A+不仅是对孩子们成绩的认可,更是对他们成长过程的信心和期许。它鼓励学生不断追求卓越,不论是在学术上、技能上,还是在个人素养和社会责任感上,都能获得持续的提升。这种教育方式促使孩子们在面对未来的挑战时,充满信心和动力,具备多元化的适应能力。 人人都是A 在素质教育的价值观中,人人都是A,这不仅是对孩子们学习成果的认可,更是一种社会平等的体现。素质教育认为,教育的根本目的不是将孩子们分出优劣,而是通过给予平等的教育资源和发展机会,激发出每个孩子的潜能和价值。无论孩子的天赋和兴趣领域是什么,教育都应该提供一个支持包容的环境,让他们能够在自己擅长的领域取得成就,同时激励他们尝试新事物,探索不同的可能性。“人人都是A”的理念将会消除教育中的标签化现象,强调尊重个体差异和接纳多样性。 传统教育与素质教育的对比 传统的教育评价体系倾向于根据固定的标准对学生进行排名和区分,这种做法可能导致一些孩子因为成绩不理想而产生自卑感,影响学习兴趣。而素质教育则倡导以多维度的评估体系来看待孩子们的成长,不仅仅关注学习成绩,还重视孩子在学习过程中的探索精神、问题解决能力、团队协作和创造力等方面的表现。这种差异化的评价方式鼓励孩子们关注自己的成长过程,而不是与他人比较成绩的高低。 通过多维度的评估方式,素质教育为孩子们提供了个性化的支持,帮助他们在擅长的领域取得更大的成就,同时也激发他们探索新的学习领域,培养面对复杂问题的适应能力。这种方式不仅帮助孩子们树立自信心,还能培养他们的独立思考能力和终身学习的习惯。 素质教育:通向公民社会的桥梁 素质教育中“每个孩子都是A”的理念,不仅是教育领域的革新,更是推动社会平等的重要一步。它符合普遍人权的原则,让每个孩子在教育中都享有平等的机会和发展权利。这种教育方式消除了成绩的单一化追求,打破了对“失败”的标签化认定,有助于减少社会阶层的分化,让所有孩子在教育中获得公正的待遇和成长机会。 素质教育培养的不仅是有知识和技能的个体,还着力于塑造具有责任感、社会关怀和全球视野的未来公民。通过这种教育方式,孩子们从小就树立起正确的公民意识,认识到自己和他人的平等价值,学会尊重差异、包容多样性。这些素质不仅能使他们在未来社会中胜任各种角色,也为建设一个更公平、更民主的公民社会奠定了基础。 结语 素质教育倡导“每个孩子都是A”的理念,是对教育方式的革新和对公民平等的尊重。A后面的“+”号象征着孩子们无限的成长潜力和不断的进步;“无限A+”则激励他们在成长过程中追求卓越、勇于探索。通过多维度的评估和差异化的培养方式,素质教育为每个孩子提供了平等的发展机会,使他们能够在多样化的学习环境中展示自己的价值和潜能。这种教育方式不仅能塑造出更具适应力和创造力的个体,还能推动社会向更公平、更民主的方向发展,为实现公民社会的理想打下坚实的基础。

Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love

Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love

Kishou · Oct 26, 2024

Do not laugh at other people’s dreams, even if you are a hero. Today, I happened to watch an interview with Elon Musk, which inspired me to write this article. Dreams are the deepest and most genuine desires of the human spirit, reflecting our hopes for the future and our search for purpose. However, many […]

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content