Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

我引以骄傲的孩子成为了一个让人唾弃的人

我引以骄傲的孩子成为了一个让人唾弃的人

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

近年来,越来越多的留学生在国外大学遭遇退学,这一现象令人忧心。这些曾经被寄予厚望的孩子,逐渐从“骄傲”变成了“负担”。为什么这些学生会在国外大学中频频挣扎?答案不仅仅在于个人,更深刻地体现在我们教育体系的缺失上,尤其是文化传统教育与知识教育的双重限制,以及公民教育、理想引导教育和文明素质教育的严重缺失。 首先,教育过度追求成绩,学生们被迫在追求高分的道路上舍弃了其他至关重要的发展。教育体系往往将学术成就作为衡量学生的唯一标准,忽视了他们的全面成长。这种只关注成绩的模式使学生成为了“考试机器”,但他们的创造力、批判性思维和适应能力却未得到有效培养。当这些学生进入西方的教育体系时,他们在适应独立思考和多元文化环境方面表现得极为吃力,往往失去方向感。这种教育模式不仅限制了个体的发展空间,更是在一定程度上以知识“残害”学生,让他们无法在更复杂的现实世界中立足。 其次,不少留学生的失败不仅源于他们的文化教育背景,还在于他们缺乏理想引导、公民教育和文明素质教育。公民教育的缺失让他们难以在国外找到自己的社会角色。西方国家的公民教育注重个体责任与社会贡献,而我们的学生则长期被引导追求个人成功,却很少被教导承担作为社会成员的责任。这使得他们在国外常常显得孤立无援,在缺乏责任感的同时,逐渐被社会边缘化。 文明素质教育的缺乏进一步加剧了这一问题。很多留学生享受着国外优质的教育资源,却没有意识到回馈社会的重要性。有些学生甚至表现出对当地文化的漠视或不尊重,违反社会规则,导致他们在异国他乡被视为“寄生虫”。这种只享受而不贡献的态度,使他们逐渐失去了国外社会的好感,甚至被认为是负担。 然而,真正能够改变这一切的,是社会素质教育。社会素质教育涵盖了文明教育、公民教育和文化教育,能够帮助学生在学术之外,培养应对社会的能力与责任感。这种教育不仅仅是为了提升学生的知识储备,更重要的是塑造他们成为有社会责任感的世界公民。通过社会素质教育,学生可以学会适应多样化的文化,增强跨文化理解力,并为所在社会的发展做出贡献。 文明教育可以帮助学生理解不同文明的多样性,培养他们的文化敏感性。公民教育则能够让学生意识到自己的社会责任,引导他们积极参与社会活动,贡献于社会的进步。而文化教育则帮助他们在全球化的背景下更加开放包容,避免狭隘的民族主义倾向。 总之,中国的教育体系在培养知识方面无疑取得了显著成就,但忽略了理想、责任和社会素质的全面发展。我们的孩子本应成为全球公民,然而由于教育中的诸多缺失,他们成了他国社会中的边缘人。只有通过引入社会素质教育,让学生具备更强的社会责任感和全球视野,我们才能确保他们不仅在学术上取得成就,更能在文化、社会上找到自己的位置,为社会发展做出真正的贡献。

The Significance and Value of Enhancing Civilizational Awareness for Humanity

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

Enhancing civilizational awareness is essential for all of humanity. Civilization serves as a symbol of social progress and reflects the elevation of human intellect, culture, and behavior, shaping our lifestyles, social structures, and the future of the world. Its essence includes the accumulation and advancement of morality, law, culture, and technology, all of which together […]

read more

Related Content

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content