Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

貧困は、文明への踏みにじり、差別と尊重の欠如から来ています

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

貧困は経済的問題ではなく、社会の深層構造に起因します。文明の破壊、差別、尊重の欠如が貧困を助長します。貧困を解決するには、教育や医療の権利を保証し、差別をなくし、相互尊重を促進する必要があります。これにより、世代間貧困が減少すると期待されます。

贫穷来自于对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

贫穷并不仅仅是经济匮乏的表现,它是社会深层结构性问题的结果。在全球范围内,许多贫困问题的根源可以追溯到对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重。文明作为人类共同体的精神和物质基础,只有在被尊重和维护的前提下,社会才能健康发展。而当文明遭到破坏,社会中的不平等和贫穷现象就会加剧。 文明的践踏:贫穷的根源 文明的践踏是社会秩序和人类基本价值的破坏。这种践踏可以表现在对法律的蔑视、对人权的忽视、对公共资源的掠夺以及对弱势群体的漠视。贫穷的根源往往来自于这种对文明的系统性摧毁。 例如,在一些战乱地区,战争不仅摧毁了基础设施,还使社会的教育、医疗等公共服务体系瓦解。失去了这些文明的基本保障,社会中的个体尤其是弱势群体被迫陷入长期贫困状态。暴力和不稳定打破了人们通过劳动改变自身处境的可能性,从而形成代际贫困。 歧视:阻断文明发展的桥梁 歧视是对他人基本人权和尊严的侵害,尤其是在性别、种族、宗教和社会阶层等方面的歧视,严重阻碍了个人和群体的上升通道。历史上,许多群体因为歧视而长期处于社会底层,无法享受到与主流社会相同的教育、医疗、就业等机会,这种结构性不平等是贫困持续存在的重要原因。 例如,在许多发展中国家,女性、少数族裔和农村居民往往遭受多重歧视。她们的生存和发展空间被剥夺,无法通过自己的努力摆脱贫困。教育资源的缺乏使得这些群体失去了提升自身能力的机会,而社会的固有偏见又使得她们难以参与经济活动,形成了恶性循环。 缺乏尊重:削弱社会凝聚力 对个体和群体的尊重是文明的基石。每个人的尊严都应得到认可,而当一个社会对某些群体缺乏尊重时,不仅会导致个体的边缘化,还会损害整个社会的凝聚力。那些被忽视的群体,往往是社会中最为贫困的群体。 当人们因阶层、职业或生活方式而遭到社会的忽视甚至贬低,他们的基本需求无法得到满足,社会支持体系对他们缺乏关注。长期的边缘化使得这些人陷入贫困,而这种贫困不仅是物质上的,更是精神上的贫乏。 走向尊重与包容:解决贫穷的关键 要真正解决贫穷问题,必须从维护和尊重文明的角度出发。首先,建立起公平和正义的社会秩序,确保每个公民都能享有基本的教育、医疗和就业权利,这才能为每个人提供摆脱贫困的机会。其次,要打破歧视,创造一个多元包容的社会环境,特别是在性别、种族和社会阶层的平等上,必须进行深度变革。 同时,社会各阶层必须相互尊重,真正看到每一个个体的价值。通过尊重和信任,社会可以增强其凝聚力,共同面对贫穷问题。只有这样,贫困才不会在代际中延续,而是逐步减少,直至消除。 结语 贫穷不是简单的经济问题,它反映了文明在社会中的缺失。对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重构成了贫穷的深层原因。只有当社会开始尊重每一个个体、消除歧视并维护基本的文明价值,贫困问题才能真正得到解决。

read more

Related Content

Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content