Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

淺談信仰與性格的契合:不同的信仰與性格之間有什麼聯繫?

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

信仰不僅僅是一種宗教習慣與文化身份的選擇,更是一種深刻影響人類心理和生活方式的精神力量。不同的信仰體系各具特色,吸引著性格迥異的人群。事實上,心理學和宗教學領域的研究表明,性格與信仰的契合度影響著一個人如何與信仰互動、如何從中獲得意義和指導。本文將基於性格心理學理論,結合具體實例,探討哪些性格特點更適合與佛法、基督教、上帝信仰、道教以及伊斯蘭教的真神信仰相契合。 1. 佛法與沉靜內省的性格 佛教提倡“放下”和“無我”的理念,追求內心的平靜和解脫。因此,性格內向、傾向於自我反省和冥想的人往往更容易與佛法產生共鳴。喜歡獨處並深入思考人生意義的人,往往能更好地接受佛法中對苦、無常和空性的教義。他們通常善於自我反省和冥想,更傾向於在靜思中尋求心靈的安寧。此外,具有高度同情心和關懷他人的性格也與佛教的慈悲理念相契合,因為佛教強調減少他人痛苦,並對所有眾生平等看待。例如,現代社會中許多壓力過大的人通過禪修找到內心的平靜,這反映出佛法在幫助沉靜內省者應對生活挑戰上的獨特作用。此外,心理學家卡爾·榮格(Carl Jung)的性格類型學也提到,內傾型性格的人往往有較強的精神需求,而佛教的自我觀照和冥想正契合這種內在需求。 著名的禪宗大師鈴木大拙(D.T. Suzuki)就是一個內向且對人生意義有深刻思考的人。他通過將佛教禪修引入西方,幫助了許多內傾型的人找到自我安頓之道。 2. 基督教與開放熱情的性格 基督教以「愛」與「寬恕」為核心,鼓勵信徒積極與他人建立深厚的關係,傳播福音。這使得外向、熱情且社交性強的個體容易被其吸引。因此,那些性格外向、熱情、樂於助人並且喜歡與人互動的人,往往更容易在基督教信仰中找到歸屬感。這些人通常善於表達自己的情感,並能夠積極參與教會活動和社會服務。此外,喜歡追求明確目標並遵循規矩的人也能從基督教的教義中獲得精神支持,因為基督教常提供一套清晰的生活指導原則。根據艾森克(Hans Eysenck)的性格理論,外向型性格更喜歡與人互動,容易從社交活動中獲得能量,這類人常能在教會活動和志願服務中找到歸屬感。例如,許多傳教士都是充滿激情的外向型人格,他們不僅擅長傳播基督教的愛與寬恕之道,也能從中獲得情感上的滿足。 特蕾莎修女(Mother Teresa)的例子尤為經典,她不僅以其深刻的信仰感人至深,還透過持續的慈善工作展現了基督教信仰對世界的影響力。她的性格特點正是典型的熱情外向,並且具有極強的同理心和奉獻精神。 3. 上帝信仰與追求真理的性格 上帝信仰,尤其是在猶太教、伊斯蘭教和部分基督教傳統中,強調對絕對真理和超越現實的追求。這種信仰體系吸引著具有強烈求知慾、理性思維發達的人群。那些具有強烈好奇心、喜歡探求哲學問題並尋求終極答案的人,往往對上帝信仰表現出濃厚的興趣。這些人通常富有邏輯思維,能夠接受信仰的理性維度。此外,崇尚道德與正義感強烈的性格也與此類信仰相匹配,因為上帝信仰中對倫理道德有著明確的要求。心理學家喬丹·彼得森(Jordan Peterson)指出,那些具有哲學興趣和邏輯思維能力強的人,往往對上帝信仰表現出濃厚的興趣,因為他們渴望在混沌世界中找到確定性的答案。 例如,著名的科學家艾薩克·牛頓(Isaac Newton)不僅是一位傑出的物理學家,也是虔誠的基督徒,他的上帝信仰為他的科學研究提供了精神動力。牛頓認為,探索自然規律是理解上帝智慧的方式,這一觀點揭示了追求真理的性格與上帝信仰之間的緊密聯繫。 4. 道教與自然瀟灑的性格 性格隨和、喜歡自由的個體通常更容易認同道教的理念。這些人往往不喜歡過於複雜的規則,更傾向於順應自然、享受生活的本真狀態。道教主張順應自然、自我超脫、倡導「無為而治」講究「天人合一」。因此,那些性格隨和、不拘小節且追求內心自由的人,往往與道教有著天然的契合,順應自然、享受生活的本真狀態。道教的思想適合性格中帶有「瀟灑」和「隨性」的人,因為它提倡順其自然、淡泊名利,不強求外界的成就。道教中注重調養生息、追求長生的教義也適合那些重視身心健康與和諧生活的人。心理學中的「開放性」維度也顯示,那些思維開放且崇尚自由的個體對道教的教義更感興趣,因為道教鼓勵人們擺脫社會的束縛,追求自我解放。 例如:老子提出的“道法自然”理念影響深遠,其思想不僅被中國古代哲人所推崇,也引起了許多現代西方學者的興趣,例如英國作家阿爾杜斯·赫胥黎(Aldous Huxley),他在自己的作品中多次探討道教的思想。 5. 真神信仰與紀律嚴明的性格 伊斯蘭教的信仰生活中充滿了嚴格的宗教儀式和生活準則,如每日禮拜、齋戒和慈善捐贈。這些要求對性格自律、紀律嚴明的人格類型來說相對容易接受。他們通常有較高的責任感,願意嚴格遵循信仰規定。 在伊斯蘭教中,對真神的信仰貫穿於生活的各個方面,包括禮拜、禁食和慈善。那些性格自律、重視紀律並善於遵守儀式的人,往往能很好地適應伊斯蘭教的信仰要求。這些人具有較強的責任感和社會義務感,能夠嚴格遵循教義的指引。同時,崇尚集體主義、樂於融入群體的性格也符合伊斯蘭教的價值觀,因為該信仰強調社群的團結和共同的宗教生活。人格心理學中的“盡責性”維度就強調這種性格特點,與伊斯蘭教的行為準則契合度較高。 現代社會中,許多穆斯林通過嚴格的宗教生活找到個人的穩定感和生活意義。如,在一些嚴格遵守宗教義務的穆斯林國家,社會的團結性和宗教儀式的統一性被視為集體信仰力量的體現。 性格特點與信仰的選擇密切相關,適合的信仰能夠為人們的精神生活提供支持和引導。理解不同性格適合的信仰特點,不僅可以幫助個人找到最能讓自己安心的精神家園,還可以促進不同信仰之間多元化的相互理解和包容。在追求信仰的過程中,重要的是對自己的性格特點有清晰的認識,並選擇適合自己心靈成長的信仰之路。希望這篇文章對大家有所幫助。

Exploring The Relationship Between Faith and Personality Traits

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

Faith is not only a choice of religious practices and cultural identity, it is also a profound spiritual force that significantly influences human psychology and lifestyle. Each belief system has its own unique characteristics, attracting individuals with varying personality traits. Research in psychology and religious studies has shown that the alignment between a person’s personality […]

read more

Related Content

Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
View All Content