Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

臣民国家と市民国家の根本的な違い

Daohe · Jul 16, 2025

――権力の論理、国民の運命、そして文明の尺度 はじめに:何が国家であり、誰が主人なのか? この世の全ての国家は、その本質を突き詰めれば、権力が社会を管理するための組織形態に他なりません。 しかし、なぜある国では、国民が国家の主人となり、政府は雇われた立場となるのでしょうか。そして、なぜ別の国では、国民が権力の下僕とされ、一生を国家のために奉仕し、死してなお「祖国に栄光を」と求められるのでしょうか。 この問いは、単なる制度設計の問題に留まりません。それは、文明の観念、社会心理、権力の論理、歴史的経緯、そして精神的な価値観が複雑に絡み合った産物です。 「誰が『主』で、誰が『僕』か」という問いこそが、その国の政治倫理、社会構造、そして人々の運命の全てを決定づける尺度なのです。 これこそが、市民国家と臣民国家を分かつ、最も根本的な分水嶺です。 一、臣民国家:権力至上、国民は統治機構のために存在する 臣民国家に、制度や法律がないわけではありません。むしろ、数多く存在します。 しかし、その本質は「権力本位制」です。すなわち、 このような構造の下では、国民の価値は決して個人に属さず、国家に属します。人が存在する意義は、次のようなものになります。 たとえ個人がどれほど優れていても、その意義は「国家の役に立つ」という点でのみ評価され、「自らの幸福や自由のためになる」という点では評価されません。 臣民国家における国民の精神構造 幼い頃から、次のような価値観を植え付けられます。 この価値観の核心的な目標は、 個人の人格を消し去り、個人の運命を奪い、自己のアイデンティティを完全に権力機構に帰属させることにあります。 その結果、臣民国家の社会道徳は、極めて低い水準に留まります。 人生の目標は、日々の食事にありつき、災いを避け、権力機構のために労働力を提供することに集約されてしまうのです。 二、市民国家:市民個人が至上、政府は公共サービスの提供者 これに対し、市民国家は「市民本位制」です。 その根幹は、国家利益の至上ではなく、「市民一人ひとりの生命の尊厳と、自らの運命を決定する権利」にあります。 市民国家における権力の論理 この体系において、国家が存在する価値は、ただ市民の幸福、自由、権利、そして尊厳を保障する点にのみあり、そうでなければ国家の正当性は一片もありません。 国民は幼い頃から、次のような教育を受けます。 市民国家における国民の精神構造 ここでは、政府は奉仕機関であり、公務員は給与を受け取る僕であり、権力は一時的に委託されたものであり、市民こそが国家の主人なのです。 三、文明進化の分岐点 臣民国家と市民国家は、人類の文明史における全く異なる二つの進化の道筋です。 臣民国家が誕生した論理 その根底には、人間性への不信があり、秩序と統一を強調し、個人の価値を否定します。 市民国家が誕生した論理 その根底には、人間の尊厳への確信があり、権利の均衡を重視し、個人の自由を保障します。 四、制度の背後にある倫理尺度の違い 臣民国家の倫理観 一般人は、独立した価値を持つ存在とは決して認められず、人生の価値の最高基準は「国に迷惑をかけるな」「国のために栄光を勝ち取れ」となります。 市民国家の倫理観 一般人は、自らの運命の決定権を持つ者として認められ、人生の目標は幸福、自由、尊厳の追求であり、国家はそれを保障するために存在します。 五、文明的な市民社会こそが未来の世界の必然である 人類文明が21世紀に至り、臣民国家という構造は、次第に時代遅れで野蛮な国家の統治方式へと成り下がっています。 その弊害は明らかです。 一方で、市民国家が「文明国家」と呼ばれる理由は、以下の点にあります。 未来において、市民国家であるか否かは、その国の文明度を測る唯一の基準となるでしょう。 結語:本質を見極めてこそ、自らの運命を勝ち取る資格が生まれる 多くの国民は、自分がどちらの種類の国に属しているのかを、一生知らずに過ごします。 権力の論理を理解せず、文明の倫理をわきまえず、盲目的に体制に忠誠を誓い、従順な民であることを誇らしくさえ思っています。 しかし、文明は従順な民に情けをかけることはなく、主体性のある市民のみを尊重します。 一国の文明の高さは、都市の高層ビルの数によって決まるのではなく、国民が権力を直視し、制度を吟味し、自らの人生を決めようとするか否かによって決まるのです。 臣民国家は永遠に従順な民を養うだけであり、市民国家だけが自由な人間を形作ることができるのです。

非公民国家与公民国家的根本区别

非公民国家与公民国家的根本区别

Daohe · Jul 16, 2025

——权力的逻辑、国民的命运与文明的尺度 前言:谁是国家,谁是主人? 世上所有国家,其本质无非是权力管理社会的组织形式。 可为什么有些国家,国民是国家的主人,政府是受雇的仆人;而另一些国家,国民成了权力的草民,为国家服务一生,甚至死后都要“为祖国添光”? 这个问题,不止是制度设计问题,更是文明观念、社会心理、权力逻辑、历史遗留、精神价值观共同作用的产物。 “谁是主,谁是仆”,决定了一个国家的政治伦理、社会结构和人民命运的全部尺度。 这,也是公民国家与非公民国家最根本的分界线。 一、非公民国家:权力至上,国民为统治机器而生 非公民国家,不是没有制度,也不是没有法律,它有的很多。 但它的本质是权力本位制,即: 在这种结构下,国民的价值从来不属于自己,而属于国家。你存在的意义是: 哪怕你再优秀,意义也只能体现在“对国家有用”,而不能体现在“对自己幸福和自由有益”。 非公民国家国民的精神模式 从小被灌输: 这套价值观的核心目标: 消灭个体人格、剥夺个人命运、自我认同完全附着于权力机器。 因此,非公民国家社会道德底线极低: 人生目标就是吃穿温饱、避免祸端、为权力机器贡献劳役。 二、公民国家:公民个人至上,政府是社会公共服务员 与此相对,公民国家是公民本位制。 它的根基不是国家利益至上,而是“公民个体生命尊严与命运自主”。 公民国家权力逻辑: 在这种体系内,国家的存在价值,只在于保障公民幸福、自由、权利和尊严,否则它毫无正当性。 国民从小接受教育: 公民国家国民的精神模式: 在这里,政府是服务的机构,公务员是有薪仆人,权力是暂时托管,公民才是国家的主人。 三、文明演化的分歧: 非公民国家与公民国家,是人类文明史上两条完全不同的演化路径。 非公民国家的诞生逻辑: 其根基是对人性的不信任,强调秩序统一,否定个体价值。 公民国家的诞生逻辑: 其根基是对人性尊严的确认,强调权利平衡,保障个体自由。 四、制度背后的伦理尺度差异 非公民国家伦理观: 普通人从未被承认拥有独立价值,人生价值的最高标准就是“别给国家添麻烦”“为国家争光”。 公民国家伦理观: 普通人被承认为命运自主者,人生目标是追求幸福、自由、尊严,国家存在是为之保障服务。 五、文明型公民社会是未来世界的必然 人类文明发展到21世纪,非公民国家这种结构,已经逐渐沦为落后野蛮国家的统治方式。 它的弊病显而易见: 而公民国家之所以被称为“文明型国家”,是因为: 未来,公民国家将成为衡量文明程度的唯一标准。 结语:认清本质,才有资格争取命运 很多国民终其一生都不知道自己属于哪种国家。 认不清权力逻辑,搞不懂文明伦理,盲目效忠体制,充当顺民而自觉光荣。 但文明从不怜悯顺民,只尊重自觉公民。 一个国家的文明高度,不取决于城市高楼,而取决于国民是否敢于盯着权力、审视制度、为自己命运添光。 非公民国家永远只养顺民,公民国家才能塑造自由人。

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
View All Content