Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

現代における情報植民地主義:市民社会の言論の自由と情報主権を論ず

Daohe · Jun 8, 2025

デジタル時代を迎え、情報は単なる伝達手段という役割から、統治のための資源、認識を操作する武器、そして社会を制御する手段へとその姿を変えた。 言論の自由と情報主権は、現代社会の市民が個人の尊厳、集団のアイデンティティ、そして公権力への監視を維持するための根源的な保障である。しかし今日、これらはデジタル覇権、巨大プラットフォーム資本、そして国家の安全保障装置という複数の力が絡み合う中で、全面的な侵食と剥奪の危機に瀕している。 表面的には、誰もが表現の権利を持ち、情報は至る所に溢れ、世論は活発化しているように見える。だがその裏側では、極めて巧妙かつシステマティックな「現代的情報植民地戦争」が進行しているのだ。 この戦争の目的は、単にデータ資源や経済的利益を奪うことだけではない。それは、人々の認識、思考、信条、感情、そして行動そのものを再構築し、市民社会の独立性と自己省察能力を根底から瓦解させることにある。 一、言論の自由の本質と社会的機能 言論の自由とは、決して個人の表現欲を満たすためだけのものではない。それは、現代民主主義社会における重要な自己防衛メカニズムであり、以下の機能を保障するものである。 ひとたび言論の自由が組織的に抑圧されれば、社会は自己修正能力を失い、政治権力は暴走し、特権階級が生まれ、人々の認識は画一化し、社会から異論が消え、最終的には情報全体主義へと至る。 現代のデジタルプラットフォーム上で謳われる「自由」とは、緻密な計算の上で管理された、制御可能な言論の自由に過ぎない。プラットフォームと当局が共同でルール、言説の境界線、そして世論の「越えてはならない一線」を設定し、「自由で繁栄している」という幻影を作り出す。それは実のところ、「温水でカエルを茹でる」かの如き飼い慣らしに他ならない。 二、情報主権の戦略的価値とグローバル競争 情報主権とは、一国あるいは一社会が、自らのデジタル情報の流通、データ資源、言説の体系、そして認識の枠組みを、自律的に管理・制御する能力を指す。 デジタル時代において、情報主権はもはや付随的な議題ではなく、国家の存亡に関わる問題となっている。 データ資源を制する者が、社会の動向と民衆の感情を予測し、操作し、誘導することができる。国際社会において、情報はエネルギー、金融、軍事に次ぐ新たな戦略資源と化しており、世界規模での情報主権獲得競争は激化の一途をたどっている。 1. 「デジタル覇権国家」 は、データの越境流通の自由化や人権保護を名目に、発展途上国にデータ市場の開放を要求する。その実態は、データ資源を収奪し、世論環境を操作し、政治に介入し、自国の代理人勢力を育成することにある。 2. 「デジタル植民地主義」 は、SNS、検索エンジン、ショート動画プラットフォーム、世論ランキングなどを通じて静かに浸透し、他国民の認識体系を再構築し、その国の政府の信頼性を毀損し、社会の分断と認識の混乱を生み出している。 三、プラットフォーム資本と国家権力の二重の軛 (くびき) 国内に目を向ければ、巨大プラットフォームは情報の伝達者から、世論の支配者、そして認識の操作者へと変質した。彼らはトラフィック収益の最大化という原則に基づき、感情的、対立的、迎合的なコンテンツを意図的に増幅させ、理性的、建設的、批判的な声を抑制し、トラフィック至上主義という全体主義的エコシステムを形成している。 時を同じくして、国家機関は社会の安定維持やイデオロギー防衛を名目に、センシティブワードのリスト化、キーワード監視、AIによる世論パトロール、アカウント凍結、トピックの強制的な非表示化、世論対策チームの設置といった手法を通じて、24時間体制で言論空間を隅々までコントロールしている。 資本と権力のこの共謀関係は、市民を二重の剥奪状態へと陥れる。 このような構造の下、社会の世論は、表面的には賑やかでありながら、実質的には単調で、感情論に満ち、理性を欠き、異論が消え、真実が見えない空虚な風景と化していく。 四、現代デジタル植民地主義の作動メカニズム デジタル植民地主義は、かつての武力による領土拡大や植民地支配とは異なり、以下の四重のメカニズムを通じて完成される。 五、市民の情報権の形骸化 現代社会の市民は、「デジタル時代の従順な民」へと成り下がりつつある。その特徴は以下の通りである。 彼らは、不自由であることを知りながら自由の幻想を抱き、無限の情報奔流の中で真実を見失い、判断力をなくし、次第にプラットフォームという生態系における「デジタル労働者」そして「情報消費財」と化していく。 六、情報主権を回復するための道筋 この現代のデジタル植民地主義を打ち破り、市民が本来持つべき情報主権を取り戻すためには、以下の六つの道筋が極めて重要となる。 結語 情報主権と言論の自由は、抽象的な理念ではない。それは、現代社会の市民が生き残り、デジタル全体主義に抵抗するための武器である。 言論の自由が全面的な検閲に晒され、情報主権が資本と権力のおもちゃに成り下がった時、市民社会は自己を修復し、自己を認識し、自己を解放する能力を完全に喪失するだろう。 今日、私たちが目覚めなければ、未来に自由な社会はなく、そこにあるのはデジタル監獄とトラフィックの奴隷制だけである。 行動を通じてのみ、連帯を通じてのみ、そして闘いを通じてのみ、我々は偽りの自由という幻想を打ち破り、市民自身の手に情報主権を取り戻し、真に自由で公正、かつ多様で理性的なデジタル世界を再建できるのである。

read more

Related Content

Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
View All Content