Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Time, history, and how we understand them

Time, history, and how we understand them

Daohe · Jun 5, 2025

Since the dawn of human civilization, history has carried people’s collective memory and experience. People have long tried to draw lessons from it, hoping to avoid repeating past mistakes and to push society forward. Yet when we look back across thousands of years, the rise and fall of dynasties, the cycles of war and peace, […]

重新认识时间与历史的关系

重新认识时间与历史的关系

Daohe · Jun 5, 2025

自人类文明诞生以来,历史便承载着我们的集体记忆与经验。人们常试图从历史中汲取教训,以避免重蹈覆辙、推动社会进步。然而回顾数千年的文明演进,王朝更替、战争与和平、专制与反抗似乎反复出现,呈现出某种周期性的循环。 原因不在于历史本身,而在于我们看待历史的方式。 当我们以“时间线”的视角审视历史,历史就成为一个可以被分析、归纳与理解的对象,帮助我们辨识文明演化的脉络与制度演进的逻辑。 而当我们以既有的经验去类比现实,便容易落入命运论的思维模式,将历史简化为宿命的重复,使得经验的教训难以真正转化为制度变革或认知跃迁。 本文将从这两种不同的历史观出发,探讨它们对人类文明认知、集体心理及制度构建的深层影响,并尝试回答一个关键问题:为何我们常常意识到历史的教训,却依然难以摆脱文明困境的轮回? 一、时间线历史观:还原事实,厘清路径 将历史置于时间轴上,是一种理性且系统的观察方式。它以事实为基础,将事件依时间顺序展开,使过去不再只是模糊的传说或情绪化的记忆,而成为可以分析、理解的历史现实,具备因果关系与结构逻辑。 这种方式的核心价值在于: 时间线历史观的价值,在于它拒绝将历史视为命运的重演,而是强调变量的作用。 它承认历史的开放性与文明路径的多样性,强调人类行为的能动性与制度选择的重要性。 文明是否走向进步,并非由所谓的“历史规律”决定,而取决于我们如何面对现实、反思过去、选择未来。 二、历史中的历史观:经验循环与宿命陷阱 与以时间线为基础的理性观察不同,另一种更常见的历史理解方式,是在历史中看历史——即人们倾向于以过去的历史模式解读现实,并尝试从中提炼出“规律”,以此指导当下。 这种思维背后的动因,是人类对不确定性的天然恐惧。面对复杂多变的现实,我们倾向于从既有经验中寻找解释与预判路径,以此缓解对未来的焦虑。但正是这种趋向确定性的本能,容易滑向宿命论的深渊。 具体体现在以下几个方面: 以历史看历史,最大的危害是让历史教训合法化为历史规律,使当代人失去纠错与变革意志。 三、历史为何教而不改 为何人类社会屡次面对相似的灾难,却始终难以真正吸取教训?问题并不在于历史本身不清晰,而在于文明内部存在三种深层机制,使得历史教训在传承与转化过程中被系统性削弱,甚至失效。 1. 权力的自我维系机制 执政者与既得利益集团往往出于延续统治的需求,有意回避甚至篡改历史真相。前朝之覆可能被描述为“天命已尽”或“人心叵测”,而非制度崩溃或社会失衡。 这种对历史教训的选择性叙述,实质是为了削弱变革的正当性,从而维持现有秩序。 2. 集体认知的惰性机制 公共意识倾向于接受熟悉、线性、符合传统经验的解释,而对复杂性与不确定性保持天然警惕。这种认知惰性让社会更愿意接受“盛极必衰”这样的宿命叙事,而非深入剖析具体的制度性失败。 久而久之,历史经验被简化为模式,变成一种“心理安慰”,而非行动指南。 3. 叙事权的封闭控制机制 谁掌握叙事,谁就掌握历史的意义。在大多数社会中,历史往往由官方书写,反思性的民间声音则被边缘化甚至封锁。结果是,即使真实的教训存在,也难以进入主流教育与公共讨论,从而失去触达集体意识的渠道。 这三种机制相互交织,使文明难以形成有效的自我修正能力。历史不仅被遗忘,更被格式化、被利用,成为延续旧模式的工具,而非开启新路径的资源。 因此,哪怕灾难重演,社会依然可能选择熟悉但失败的方案,陷入一次次看似“不可避免”的轮回。 四、文明突围的现实路径 要真正吸取历史的教训,文明必须挣脱经验主义与宿命论的束缚,回归基于事实、逻辑和变量的历史理解。这种突围不是抽象的理念转变,而是现实中集体认知和制度实践的深刻重构。 这意味着: 结语 当我们将历史的发展置于时间线中去看待,历史便回归其真实面貌,成为文明认知自身演进路径的参照。 而当我们用既有的历史模式去解释现实与未来,便容易落入经验的循环与宿命的陷阱,使教训失效,让文明困于自我复制的轮回。 文明的进步并非时间推移的自然结果,也不是历史规律的自动演化。它的发展依赖于少数清醒之人——那些敢于质疑旧范式、突破经验窠臼、重构制度与秩序的人。他们推动时代断裂与文明重生,赋予历史真正的价值。

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content