Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

1. What is a state? What is a citizen?

A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, common security, and collective visions for the future. Citizens are the foundation and core of the state. Without genuine citizens, a state loses its legitimacy as a political community and degenerates into a mere instrument of rule and coercion.

True citizenship is not defined solely by residence or possession of national identity documents. It is defined by the exercise of political sovereignty.

Only when individuals possess political sovereignty can they become true agents within the national community—able to decide, monitor, participate in, and place checks on the operation of state power. Only then does the state become “our state,” rather than a tool monopolized by a privileged few.

2. Historical depth: the evolution of the state and sovereignty

Looking back through human political history, the earliest forms of the state emerged from tribal alliances, military conquest, and territorial rule. These early “states” were held together by force and bloodline, with individuals stripped of rights and subjects possessing no sovereignty of their own.
In the age of feudal empires and theocratic regimes, political sovereignty was concentrated entirely in the hands of monarchs, popes, nobles, and clergy. The people were treated as livestock—powerless, disposable, and voiceless.

It was not until the rise of the modern nation-state—through the Enlightenment, bourgeois revolutions, and the creation of constitutional governments—that the idea of popular sovereignty and citizen political participation began to enter state structures. The French Revolution declared that “sovereignty belongs to the people.” The U.S. Constitution established a “government of the people” and a popularly elected legislature. From this point onward, the political legitimacy of modern states began to rest on the principle of citizen sovereignty.

Yet even today, truly citizen-sovereign states remain rare. In most countries, the idea of “rule by the people” exists only in name. In practice, power is still concentrated in the hands of a few, while citizens remain passive, subordinate, and politically excluded.

Where citizens are absent, sovereignty is hollow. Where sovereignty is hollow, the state decays—and with it, civilization stalls.

3. The true meaning of political sovereignty

Political sovereignty is not a symbolic clause in the constitution, nor is it limited to occasional elections. It is the genuine right of citizens to participate meaningfully in the operation of state power, the making of public decisions, the allocation of public resources, and the design of governance structures.

This system includes:

  • Decision-making power: Citizens have the right to express opinions, propose ideas, and take part in decisions on major national issues—not merely to passively accept outcomes made by others.
  • Oversight power: Citizens have the right to monitor the actions of the government, judiciary, military, and public institutions, holding them accountable and preventing abuse of power.
  • Recall power: Citizens have the right to remove officials who violate public interests or harm citizens’ rights.
  • Participation rights: Citizens should be able to engage widely in national affairs—whether through parliaments, civic organizations, public forums, or digital platforms—across domains such as law, economy, education, welfare, and environmental policy.

If a state allows only formalistic voting but denies citizens substantive political sovereignty, then the people become mere numbers, and the state becomes an oligarchy.

4. Without sovereignty, citizenship is just a lie

In today’s world, many countries claim to be “citizen-based,” but in reality, citizenship often exists only in name. Citizens are given legal identity, but not real power. They have no sovereignty and no true role in governing the country.

They carry obligations and pay the price, but are left out of the decision-making process, becoming mere subordinates of the state.

This means:

  • Public resources are neither fairly nor transparently distributed, and decisions are made behind closed doors, allowing a small elite to monopolize the benefits meant for all.
  • The legal system does not always protect equality. Some people enjoy privileges, while basic rights for the majority are often ignored.
  • Policies are shaped by powerful interest groups. There is no strong system to protect public interest.
  • Public opinion is manipulated and citizens have no real way to speak their minds.

This creates a troubling social structure: the state promises to put citizens first, but fails to treat them as true participants in public affairs.

When sovereignty slips from the hands of the people, the state loses its power to unite hearts and minds. Social trust begins to crumble, and the foundation of civilization starts to shake. In the end, such a nation no longer belongs to all its people—it becomes the private property of a privileged few, and its decline becomes irreversible.

5. The impact of lost sovereignty on a nation’s fate

History and reality both repeatedly prove this: any nation that strips its citizens of sovereignty will eventually fall into four major crises:

  1. Social fragmentation: When political power is overly concentrated and the public lacks channels for participation and oversight, social classes become rigid, and tensions between different groups cannot be resolved through institutional means. This may ultimately lead to deep division or even national disintegration.
  2. Crisis of legitimacy: A government’s legitimacy depends on citizens’ trust and sense of belonging. Once people are politically marginalized, collective identity weakens, and public trust in government declines. The regime is then forced to rely on coercion to maintain order, pushing the state into a crisis of rule.
  3. Collapse of public morality: When governance revolves solely around power and profit—rather than responsibility and the common good—public morality begins to erode. Core values like justice, fairness, trust, and accountability lose institutional support, leading to moral decline and social decay.
  4. National decline and collapse: History shows that whether empires or modern states, once they lose the support of the people, their systems of governance break down, and their social structures weaken, they become unable to respond to internal and external challenges—ultimately falling into irreversible decline or complete collapse.

6. The only path to a civilized future

If human civilization is to continue progressing, there is only one viable path: the full establishment of a modern state system based on citizen political sovereignty. This means:

  • All state power must belong to the citizens, and political authority must be derived from their consent.
  • Citizens must enjoy equal, open, and ongoing rights to political participation.
  • A strict system of checks, balances, and accountability must be in place to prevent the privatization of power and the formation of political oligarchies.
  • Public affairs must be transparent and open, allowing citizens to express their views in real time and receive meaningful responses and feedbacks.
  • A citizen-led society must be built, advancing mechanisms for local governance, industry self-regulation, and community-level consultation.

Only through such a system can a nation truly become a citizen-based state—one that is stable, just, and prosperous. Only then can civilization continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state.

A nation without the political sovereignty of its citizens becomes nothing more than a regime of elites and a machine of coercion.

A society without citizen sovereignty becomes a stage of oppression, exploitation, and hollow performances.

A civilization without citizen sovereignty is destined to fall into darkness, corruption, and collapse.

The true owners of a country can only be its civic citizens—those who hold political sovereignty in their own hands. The future belongs to the citizens: those who have the courage to awaken, to participate, to claim, and to defend their sovereignty.

This is the bottom line for the existence of any nation, and the final safeguard for the future of civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 一、国家とは何か?社会公民とは何か? 国家とは、抽象的な疆域、制度、政体、あるいは政権の集合体ではありません。近代国家の本質とは、公民が、自らの利益、共同の安全、そして未来へのビジョンを基に、自発的に締結した政治共同体です。公民は、国家が存在するための主体であり、根幹なのです。もし国家に、真の意味での「公民」が存在しなければ、その国は政治共同体としての正当性を失い、単なる統治機関や暴力装置へと成り下がってしまいます。 公民であるということの真の意味は、単に特定の国境内に居住していることでも、その国の身分証明書を所持していることでもありません。それは、政治的主権を享受しているかどうかにかかっています。 政治的主権を持って初めて、個人は真に「国家共同体」における権力の主体となることができます。そうして初めて、国家権力の運営を決定し、監督し、それに関与し、抑制と均衡を図ることができるのです。そして、国家を、一部の少数者の専有物ではなく、「私たちの国家」とすることができるのです。 二、歴史の深層:国家と主権の進化 人類の政治史を概観すると、国家の出現は当初、部族の連合、軍事的な拡大、そして領土の支配に源を発していました。初期の「国家」は、武力と血縁によって維持され、個人に権利はなく、臣民に主権はありませんでした。中世の封建帝国や神権政治も、例外なく政治的主権を国王、教皇、貴族、聖職者といった階層の手に固く握りしめ、人民は家畜のように、その運命は草のように扱われました。 近代的な国民国家が興隆し、啓蒙主義運動、ブルジョア革命、そして近代的な立憲制度が確立されて初めて、「国民主権」や「公民の政治参加」が、国家の政治構造の中に徐々に組み込まれていったのです。フランス革命は「主権は人民に属する」と宣言し、アメリカ合衆国憲法は「人民政府、民選議会」を確立しました。こうして、近代国家の政治的正当性は、初めて「公民の主権」の上に築かれ始めたのです。 しかしながら、今日の世界を見渡しても、真に「公民の政治的主権」を実現している国家は、ごく少数です。大多数の国家は、依然として「見せかけの公民国家」の状態に留まっています。すなわち、名目上は「人民が国家の主である」としながら、実質的には権力は少数の集団に集中し、公民は受動的な服従者や道具に過ぎないのです。 公民が不在であれば、主権もまた不在となり、国家は退化し、文明は停滞します。 三、政治的主権の真の意味 政治的主権とは、形式的に設けられた法律の条文でも、時折行われる選挙投票でもありません。それは、公民が、国家権力の運営、公共の事柄に関する意思決定、公的資源の分配、そして国家の統治構造の設計に、実質的に関与できる権利のことです。 具体的には、以下の権利が含まれます。 もし国家が、形式的な「投票」だけを許し、公民に実質的な政治的主権を与えないのであれば、公民は単なる数字へと成り下がり、国家は寡頭制へと堕落するでしょう。 四、主権なくして、公民という存在は偽りとなる 現実の世界では、多くの国家が自らを「公民国家」と称しながらも、形式的に公民としての身分を与えているに過ぎません。その実質において、公民は主権を持たず、国家の統治に実質的に参加する権利もありません。 彼らは義務を負い、代償を払いながらも、権力構造の外側に置かれ、国家という機械の付属物となっているのです。 それは、以下のことを意味します。 この現象は、深く考察するに値する社会構造を浮かび上がらせます。すなわち、国家は制度設計上、「公民を基本とする」と約束しながら、実践においては、公民が公共の事柄における共同の参加者であるという地位を、真に実現できていないのです。 主権が人々の手から失われる時、国家はもはや民心を引きつける力を持ちません。社会の信頼はそこから瓦解し、文明発展の礎は揺らぎ始めます。最終的に、そのような国家は、全国民のものではなくなり、特権階級の私有財産と化し、その衰退もまた、覆い難いものとなるでしょう。 五、主権の欠如が、国家の運命に与える影響 歴史と現実は、社会公民から主権を奪ったいかなる国家も、最終的には以下の四つの苦境に陥ることを、繰り返し証明しています。 六、文明の未来における、唯一の道 人類文明が持続的に進歩しようとするならば、唯一実行可能な道は、「公民の政治的主権」を全面的に確立した、近代的な国家制度を築くことです。すなわち、 ただ、そうして初めて、国家は真に「公民国家」となり、社会は安定的で、公正で、繁栄し、文明は持続的に進化していくことができるのです。 結語 公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 国家が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それは権力者の支配と暴力装置が残るだけです。 社会が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、そこには抑圧、収奪、そして偽善的なパフォーマンスが残るだけです。 文明が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それはやて暗黒、腐敗、そして崩壊へと陥るでしょう。 国家の真の主人たりうるのは、政治的主権をその手に握る、社会公民だけです。未来が真に属するのは自ら目覚め、参加し、権利を求め、そして自らの主権を守り抜く勇気を持つ社会公民なのです。 これこそが、国家が存在するための最低ラインであり、一つの文明が前進し続けられるかどうかを左右する、最後の保証なのです。  

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

read more

Related Content

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
View All Content